My parents immigrated to the US in the 1960s and have been fortunate to truly live the American dream. They raised me to be a proud American and to uphold the values of liberty and justice for all. As a family we have had the opportunity to give back to our community and support access to healthcare, education, the arts, and more. We are patriotic American Muslims.
When Donald Trump became President, I felt insecure as an American Muslim for the first time in my life. Trump had campaigned on a hateful platform – scapegoating immigrants, Mexicans, Muslims, and many others. He said that all Muslims are possible terrorists, and since we cannot tell the good Muslims from the bad, let’s ban all of them. Islamophobia, like anti-semitism, increased in Westchester and across the country after Trump was elected.
I was angry and refused to let my country be taken over by extremists. I joined the resistance to the Trump agenda and got involved with grassroots activists in Westchester. We focused on local elections, raising awareness, protesting, getting out the vote, and advocating for justice and equality for all. We galvanized Westchester Muslims to campaign for George Latimer in our effort to oust the sitting pro-Trump County Executive. Latimer’s campaign was a huge success, thanks in large part to the progressive activists throughout Westchester.
I was proud to serve on Latimer’s transition team, and then as Board Member of the Westchester County Human Rights Commission. I have also been an active member of Human Rights Watch’s NY Committee for the last 14 years, and served as Board Member for both Refugees International and the Stimson Center. But today, I see he is not who we thought he was.
This election year, we face many challenges, especially from the radical right wing in our country, which seeks to restrict the rights of all women and of most minorities. This is the time for progressives to be united. Latimer’s run for Congress is unnecessary and a distraction from this goal. We have a progressive, proactive, successful incumbent congressman: Jamaal Bowman.
In two terms, Jamaal Bowman has grown from a promising progressive champion, to one of Congress’ most proven progressive leaders. It’s not just that he beat the NRA to ban “ghost guns” nationwide and secured over $1 billion in funding for our district. It’s that he is unafraid to speak out against Islamophobia, anti-semitism, racism, sexism, homophobia and any form of bigotry. It is a rare leader who has the moral courage to stand for peace even knowing it will invite a $20 million dollar primary against him..
All this makes the fact that AIPAC specifically recruited and funded Latimer to challenge Bowman all the more upsetting to me. AIPAC is funded by right wing Republican extremists who would like nothing better than to stack the US Congress with ‘bought-and-paid-for’ members who can help them turn our country backwards.
Latimer’s campaign is using right wing tactics; promoting Islamophobia and tarnishing Bowman’s image by labeling him a terrorist sympathizer who gets money from “Hamas supporters” because Bowman calls for a ceasefire and return of hostages on both sides, for a free Palestine alongside a free Israel.
In fact, I have seen that in Westchester County, people – of any race or religion – who express sympathy for the loss of civilian (mostly Muslim) lives in Gaza are promptly labeled ‘Hamas supporters’ or ‘terrorist sympathizers’. I have personally heard from local Muslim children who have been called ‘terrorists’ in school simply because they acknowledged the suffering of Palestinians on social media. This is Islamophobia, anti Arab and anti-Muslim prejudice, and it is extremely offensive and totally unacceptable. Conflating all Muslims with terrorism is a horrifying and demeaning trope that makes Muslims, and those who “look Muslim,” susceptible to dangerous and often violent attacks. Islamophobia, like anti-semitism, has no place in Westchester County, NY State or the United States of America.
The way I see it, you can either consider yourself a progressive Democrat who is fighting for equality for all, to keep special interest money out of Washington and to make our Congress more just, or, you can vote for Latimer. You just can’t do both.
Farah Kathwari is a Westchester County Human Rights Commission board member, and former member of the George Latimer Transition Team.
White Plains, NY – Westchester County Executive George Latimer is facing intense scrutiny and criticism for a series of bigoted and Islamophobic remarks and actions targeting Black and Muslim communities, as well as openly disrespectful comments towards Congressman Jamaal Bowman, the first Black congressman representing the district.
A coalition of Muslim, Jewish, and progressive organizations, including Westchester Progressives, American Muslims Indivisible, Working Families Party, American Muslim Civic Engagement, The Jewish Voice, Protect Our Power, and Jews for Jamaal, held a press conference on Friday, June 14th, at 2:30 PM in front of the Westchester County Office Building to address these concerns (see video below).
Latimer, who right-wing MAGA billionaire groups recently recruited to challenge incumbent Congressman Jamaal Bowman, has been accused of mimicking the bigoted dog-whistles of his MAGA funders—the organizers of the press conference claim that Latimer’s actions and words have increasingly targeted minority groups.
One of the incidents cited by the coalition involves Latimer’s appearance on a right-wing radio station, where he blamed mail-in voting and the George Floyd tragedy for Bowman’s election, stating that Black voters “skewed the results.” Latimer reportedly chuckled with the hosts when they suggested, “Are you even allowed to say ‘black’?”
Furthermore, Latimer has been criticized for bailing on an NAACP debate at the last minute and declining organizers’ offer to join by Zoom, displaying what the coalition calls a “disdain for Westchester County’s Black community.”
During a recent NY1 debate, Latimer openly disrespected Congressman Bowman, claiming that the Congressman only looks out for Black and Brown communities. Critics argue that Latimer’s comments dismiss the Congressman’s efforts to address the needs of marginalized communities and fail to acknowledge Latimer’s role in perpetuating inequality during his 30-year career as a county legislator and state Senator. Latimer’s policies have been accused of contributing to the lack of wealth distribution and the segregation of Westchester’s cities, towns, and villages.
Congressman Bowman’s supporters point out that addressing the needs of marginalized communities is crucial, especially considering the long-standing disparities in Westchester County. They argue that Latimer’s dismissal of these concerns is disrespectful to the Congressman and the communities he represents.
The press conference organizers aim to send a clear message that most rational people of Westchester County are united against hatred, bigotry, and Republican dog-whistles against minority groups. They are calling on the media to shine a brighter light on Latimer’s alleged attempts to demean and isolate Black and Muslim communities through his actions and rhetoric.
As the controversy surrounding Latimer’s comments and actions continues to grow, many are calling for a closer examination of his record in dealing with county workers who are of Muslim descent. The coalition’s message is clear: the conscious voters of Congressional District 16 must reject George Latimer’s leadership and vote against bigotry, racism, and Islamophobia on June 25th. Win or lose, George Latimer has put a period in his long political career as running the most racist and bigoted race that Westchester Black and Brown communities have ever seen.
As we celebrate Father’s Day in 2024, it is crucial to reflect on the essential role that fathers play in the lives of their children and families, particularly within the Black community. The Bible provides timeless wisdom and guidance for men striving to be good fathers, and these principles remain as relevant today as ever. In my dedication to Black fathers, I would like to take the time to explore the biblical foundations of fatherhood and how Black men can apply these teachings to strengthen their families and communities.
The Black community has faced numerous challenges throughout history, including the legacy of slavery, systemic racism, and economic disadvantages. These factors have often led to the fracturing of Black families, with many children growing up without the presence and guidance of a father figure. Research has shown that children who grow up without a father are more likely to experience poverty, behavioral issues, and lower educational attainment.
However, when Black fathers are actively involved in their children’s lives, the outcomes are significantly more positive. Children with engaged fathers are more likely to have better academic performance, higher self-esteem, and stronger emotional and social skills. Furthermore, the presence of a loving and supportive father can help break the cycle of intergenerational trauma and provide a foundation for future success.
Biblical Principles for Fatherhood
Love and Nurture One of the most fundamental principles of fatherhood in the Bible is the importance of love and nurture. In Ephesians 6:4, fathers are instructed to “bring [their children] up in the training and instruction of the Lord.” This verse highlights the responsibility of fathers to provide not only physical care but also spiritual guidance and emotional support.
Black fathers can demonstrate love and nurture by being present in their children’s lives, actively listening to their concerns, and offering encouragement and affirmation. By creating a safe and loving home environment, fathers can help their children develop a strong sense of self-worth and resilience in the face of life’s challenges.
Discipline and Guidance The Bible also emphasizes the role of fathers in providing discipline and guidance to their children. Proverbs 22:6 states, “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old, he will not depart from it.” This verse underscores the lasting impact that a father’s guidance can have on a child’s life trajectory.
Black fathers can provide discipline and guidance by setting clear expectations and boundaries, consistently enforcing consequences for misbehavior, and modeling positive behaviors and values. By teaching their children to make wise choices and take responsibility for their actions, fathers can help them navigate the complexities of growing up in today’s world.
Spiritual Leadership In addition to providing physical and emotional care, the Bible calls on fathers to be spiritual leaders in their homes. Joshua 24:15 famously declares, “As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” This verse reminds fathers of their responsibility to set a godly example for their families and prioritize faith in their daily lives.
Black fathers can be spiritual leaders by regularly attending church, leading family devotions, and engaging in prayer and Bible study with their children. By fostering a strong spiritual foundation, fathers can help their children develop a sense of purpose, moral strength, and hope in the face of adversity.
Provision and Protection The Bible also highlights the role of fathers as providers and protectors for their families. 1 Timothy 5:8 states, “But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” This verse emphasizes the importance of fathers taking responsibility for the material well-being of their families.
Black fathers can fulfill this role by working diligently to provide for their families’ needs, whether through employment, entrepreneurship, or other means. Additionally, fathers should strive to create a safe and stable home environment, shielding their children from harmful influences and standing up for their rights and well-being in the face of injustice.
Forgiveness and Grace Finally, the Bible teaches the importance of forgiveness and grace in family relationships. Colossians 3:13 instructs, “Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.” This verse reminds fathers that they, too, are imperfect and in need of forgiveness, both from their children and from God.
Black fathers can model forgiveness and grace by acknowledging their own shortcomings, apologizing when they make mistakes, and extending understanding and compassion to their children. By creating a home environment characterized by forgiveness and grace, fathers can foster a sense of emotional safety and teach their children the importance of healthy conflict resolution.
Overcoming Challenges and Breaking Stereotypes While the biblical principles of fatherhood provide a solid foundation, Black fathers often face unique challenges and stereotypes in today’s society. Media portrayals and societal biases often paint Black fathers as absent, uninvolved, or irresponsible, perpetuating harmful narratives that can undermine their efforts to be present and engaged in their children’s lives.
To counter these stereotypes, Black fathers must be intentional about breaking the mold and setting positive examples in their families and communities. This can involve actively challenging negative assumptions, seeking out mentorship and support from other successful Black fathers, and advocating for policies and initiatives that support and strengthen Black families.
Additionally, Black fathers must recognize and address the systemic barriers that can make it difficult to fulfill their roles, such as limited access to education, employment opportunities, and healthcare. By working together with community leaders, faith organizations, and policymakers, Black fathers can help create a more equitable and supportive environment for themselves and their families.
As we celebrate Father’s Day this year, let us remember the powerful impact that Black fathers can have on their children, families, and communities. By embracing the biblical principles of love, discipline, spiritual leadership, provision, and forgiveness, Black men can rise to the challenge of being the fathers their children need and deserve.
While the journey of fatherhood is not always easy, the rewards are immeasurable. By investing in the lives of their children and being a positive presence in their families, Black fathers can help break cycles of disadvantage, heal intergenerational wounds, and lay the foundation for a brighter future.
As we move forward, let us celebrate and support the Black fathers who are making a difference, and let us encourage and uplift those who are striving to be better. Together, we can build stronger families, communities, and a more just and equitable society for all.
And Then There Was Two Left In Westchester DA primary race, Adeel Mirza withdraws and puts his support behind Wagstaff!
Adeel Mirza, a former prosecutor in the Westchester County District Attorney’s Office has dropped out of the race to succeed DA Miriam Elizabeth “Mimi” Rocah, the day before early voting begins and day after Rocah makes her endorsement. Mirza will be throwing his support behind Wagstaff someone he says is reform-minded and has always held Democratic values.
In an announcement sent to Black Westchester on Friday, Adeel Mirza said he was “deeply grateful for the support and encouragement from every corner of this county.”
“I ran for District Attorney because, after almost two decades in the Westchester DA’s office, I had the experience to run the office, reform it, and keep families safe. Throughout this campaign, I had the incredible opportunity to visit every corner of our county, meeting people, leaders, and activists who care deeply about our communities’ futures. I am deeply grateful for the support and encouragement from every corner of this county.
The District Attorney’s office is a vital piece of that future, and whoever holds the office must be someone who holds our Democratic values – and always has. That is why, after much reflection and conversations, I have decided to stop campaigning and back William Wagstaff for District Attorney. I have gotten to know William throughout this race, and he is kind, generous, thoughtful, and reform-minded. He will run the office with integrity and keep families safe while pursuing justice for all, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, gender identity, or economic status.
What we can not have is a District Attorney who has run on the Republican and Conservative Party lines – because those values are not our values. We need a Democrat who has always been a Democrat.
William Wagstaff will be a District Attorney we can be proud of, and I am asking all my supporters to vote for him.”
This leaves the former Westchester County Court Judge Susan Cacace, and Civil Rights Attorney William O. Wagstaff, left for to head to head face off in the June 25th Democratic primary.
Due to Mirza’s the last-minute announcement, his name will remain on the primary election ballot.
Wagstaff released a brief statement on Mirza departure from the race and the endorsement;
A lawsuit filed by students and the Virginia NAACP against the Shenandoah County School Board charges that Shenandoah has violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Educational Opportunity Act by reinstating the names of soldiers who fought to keep Black people as slaves in the U.S.
The NAACP in Virginia and five students filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday, June 12th against the Shenandoah County school board in response to their vote last month to restore the names of two schools that previously honored Confederate leaders – nearly four years after a decision was made to change them.
School board members in Virginia’s Shenandoah County voted early Friday, May 10th to restore the names of two schools that previously honored Confederate leaders – nearly four years after a decision was made to change them. The 5-1 vote the school board decided to reinstate the names Stonewall Jackson High School and Ashby Lee Elementary School. The names honor Confederate Gens. Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Turner Ashby.
The lawsuit asks the court to require the school board to remove the confederate names and mascots and to declare that the board violated the Constitution by reinstating the school names. The federal lawsuit alleges the Shenandoah County School Board is creating an unlawful and discriminatory educational environment for Black students. A copy of the complaint can be found here.
NAACP Virginia State Conference President the Rev. Cozy Bailey [Ralph Winfrey]
”By celebrating the memory of these traitors every time a child walked through the school doors, by embracing the cold wind of intolerance and division and insensitivity, the Shenandoah County School Board has resurrected the ghosts of the Jim Crow era,” NAACP Virginia State Conference President the Rev. Cozy Bailey said at a news conference.
“My belief is the Shenandoah County School Board reaffirmed their commitment to White supremacy and the celebration of a race-based rebellion against the United States of America with their vote to name public schools after military leaders of the Confederate States of America,” said Rev. Cozy Bailey continued, “When students walk through the halls of renamed Stonewall Jackson High School and Ashby Lee Elementary School, they will do so with inescapable reminders of Confederate legacies that enslaved and discriminated against African-descended people. This community deserves better.”
The lawsuit asks the court to require the school board to remove the confederate names and mascots and to declare that the board violated the Constitution by reinstating the school names. The schools have been called Mountain View High School and Honey Run Elementary School since July 2021, according to board documents.
Making Black students attend schools honoring Confederate leaders violates their constitutional rights, according to the lawsuit.
“Plaintiffs bring this case to redress the creation and maintenance of a discriminatory environment that erodes their right to receive an education and to be free from compelled speech they consider vile,” the suit says. “Requiring Plaintiffs to attend schools named in honor of prominent members of the Confederacy and compelling Plaintiffs to identify as members of the Stonewall Jackson “Generals” violates Plaintiffs’ rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Equal Educational Opportunities Act.”
Massanutten Regional Governor’s School Senior Briana Brown, a plaintiff in the law suit[photo credit Ralph Winfrey]
Plaintiff Briana Brown, a rising 12th-grader at the Massanutten Regional Governor’s School, based at Mountain View High School, said she was directly impacted by the board’s decision.
“When I found out about the school board’s decision, I felt unwelcome in a place that I go every day to, which should never be the case,” Brown said at the news conference. “… This decision has made me realize that I need to speak out about what I believe in and empower people to use their voices for positive change. I refuse to be afraid any longer.”
The lawsuit was filed in US District Court for the Western District of Virginia.
“A Black high schooler who wants to play on the soccer team must wear the Stonewall Jackson ‘Generals’ uniform. The student must honor a Confederate leader who fought to keep Black people in chains as slaves,” said an NCAA attorney, Marja Plater, senior counsel with Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. “Exposing children to this persistent racism and hate harms their self-worth and long-term health.”
The Shenandoah County School Board held its first meeting since the Virginia NAACP filed a federal lawsuit against the board. At the end of the open meeting that board member Gloria Carlineo spoke out about the lawsuit, WHSV.com reported.
“I’m not going to be talking about any of the litigation, obviously,” said Carlineo, “Except to comment, saying that we are fully committed to fighting this lawsuit to the extent of the law and we are confident that, in the end, the whole truth will come out.”
Though she declined to answer more questions about the lawsuit, board member Brandi Rutz said the board is looking into a forensic investigation into the funds used for the initial name change in 2020. Rutz alleged the 2020 school board used money from the special education department to fund the change.
Critics of the schools’ name changes argued the renaming was hasty and undemocratic. Attempts to restore the schools’ Confederate names have persisted since.
In April, the conservative local group Coalition for Better Schools brought the issue to the community once again. In a letter, the organization argued that the legacies of the two generals are complex but important to the community.
Nearly a century after the Confederate defeat, in 1954, the Supreme Court’s unanimous Brown v. Board of Education decision declared that in the field of public education, separate but equal has no place. Segregationist Virginians resisted by using every legal trick imaginable to defy the desegregation mandate, including closing public schools in Warren County, Norfolk, Charlottesville and Prince Edward County because they did not want White children to learn alongside Black children. In 1959, the first year of Prince Edward’s five year public school shut down, Shenandoah County School Board named their local high school Stonewall Jackson High. Turner-Lee became the name of the elementary school in the 1970s as that was the name of a magisterial district that has since been renamed.
Seven decades have passed since the first Brown decision and all but one member of the Shenandoah County School Board reaffirmed their commitment to White supremacy with their vote to name public schools after military leaders of the Confederate States of America. When students walk through the halls of renamed Stonewall Jackson High School and Turner-Lee Elementary School, they will do so with inescapable reminders of Confederate legacies that enslaved and discriminated against African descended people. This community deserves better.
The NAACP has protested Lost Cause memorials since the turn of the twentieth century. W. E. B. DuBois, co-founder of the NAACP and editor of The Crisis in 1931 wrote “The most terrible thing about War, I am convinced, is its monuments…In the South, particularly, human ingenuity has been put to it to explain on its war monument, the Confederacy. Of course, the plain truth of the matter would be an inscription something like this: ‘Sacred to the memory of those who fought to Perpetuate Human Slavery.’” Last night, the Shenandoah County School Board voted to re-create Confederate monuments of public schools. This community deserves better.
Shenandoah Rally [Ralph Winfrey]
The Virginia NAACP called on the Shenandoah County School Board to reverse their recent decision to name public schools after men who waged war against the USA. They vowed to use every resource at their disposal to make real the promise of the District’s mission that claims “All members of the learning community are valued and respected.” Students, parents and community members who do not share the majority of the Shenandoah County School Board’s pro-Confederate ideals are not valued and respected when forced to learn in, and pay taxes to support, Confederate memorials. This community deserves better.
“By voting for Confederate names, the school board is subjecting children to discrimination, said Marja Plater, Senior Counsel, Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. “A Black high schooler who wants to play on the soccer team must wear the Stonewall Jackson ‘Generals’ uniform. The student must honor a Confederate leader who fought to keep Black people in chains as slaves. Exposing children to this persistent racism and hate harms their self-worth and long-term health.”
The Virginia NAACP is bringing this lawsuit on behalf of its members and families, including students in the Shenandoah County school system. The families whose children attend Shenandoah County Public Schools seek the removal of Confederate names and mascots and to prevent any future naming involving Confederate leaders.
“Public education should benefit everyone, irrespective of race or class. Every student is entitled to an education free from discrimination,” said Ashley Joyner Chavous, Of Counsel, Covington & Burling. “The school board’s decision to reinstate the Confederate school names and imagery creates a school environment that denies students of color an equal opportunity to education. These actions are a slap in the face of the many Shenandoah County families and community members who have been working for decades to build a stronger and more cohesive community.”
“The Virginia NAACP will not allow localities to advance white supremacy. The Virginia NAACP will continue to fight against policies and legislation that serve to send the Commonwealth of Virginia backward,” The Virginia NAACP state in closing of their statement.
ABOUT THE VIRGINIA NAACP: Chartered in 1935, the NAACP Virginia State Conference (Virginia NAACP) is the oldest and largest nonpartisan civil rights organization in the Commonwealth. The Virginia NAACP advocates, agitates, and litigates for civil rights due to Black Virginians. Representing over 100 NAACP adult branches, youth councils, and college chapters, together, we fight to build the social and political power required to abolish racial discrimination in localities throughout Virginia. To learn more about the work of the Virginia NAACP and the issues we advocate for, visit naacpva.org.
ABOUT THE WASHINGTON LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE: The Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs works to create legal, economic, and social equity through litigation, client and public education and public policy advocacy. While we fight discrimination against all people, we recognize the central role that current and historic race discrimination plays in sustaining inequity and recognize the critical importance of identifying, exposing, combatting, and dismantling the systems that sustain racial oppression.
ABOUT COVINGTON & BURLING LLP: Covington has demonstrated a strong commitment to public service. The firm is frequently recognized for pro bono service, including 12 times being ranked the number one pro bono practice in the U.S. by The American Lawyer. Much of the firm’s pro bono work is anchored in meeting local needs, serving economicallydisadvantaged individuals and families in our surrounding communities, in addition to its long history of serving vulnerable clients and important causes throughout the U.S. and the world.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to law, that the City Council of the City of Yonkers, New York will hold a Public Hearing on Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 6:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 40 South Broadway, Yonkers, New York on the following General Ordinance, to wit:
PROPOSED GENERAL ORDINANCE
A PROPOSED GENERAL ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 43 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF YONKERS ENTITLED “ZONING” IN REGARDS TO SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
The ordinance, a summary of which is published herewith, has been adopted on May 30, 2024, and approved by the Mayor on June 11, 2024, and the validity of the obligations authorized by such ordinance may be hereafter contested only if such obligations were authorized for an object or purpose for which the CITY OF YONKERS, in the County of Westchester, New York, is not authorized to expend money or if the provisions of law which should have been complied with as of the date of publication of this Notice were not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the publication of this Notice, or such obligations were authorized in violation of the provisions of the constitution.
Vincent E. Spano City Clerk City of Yonkers, New York
SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO.29 – 2024
BOND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YONKERS, NEW YORK, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF VARIOUS TAX CERTIORARI JUDGMENTS, COMPROMISED CLAIMS AND SETTLED CLAIMS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DURING FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025, STATING THE ESTIMATED MAXIMUM COST THEREOF IS $15,000,000, APPROPRIATING SAID AMOUNT THEREFOR, AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF SAID CITY IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $15,000,000 TO FINANCE SAID APPROPRIATION.
The bonds are authorized to finance various tax certiorari judgments, compromised claims and settled claims against the City.
The period of probable usefulness is a minimum five (5) years and maximum twenty (20) years, dependent on the total amount of tax certiorari claims paid in a single fiscal year.
The amount of obligations to be issued is $15,000,000.
A complete copy of the Bond Ordinance summarized above shall be available for public inspection during normal business hours at the office of the Clerk of the City at City Hall, in Yonkers, New York.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to law, that the City Council of the City of Yonkers, New York will hold a Public Hearing on Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 6:15 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 40 South Broadway, Yonkers, New York on the following General Ordinance, to wit:
PROPOSED GENERAL ORDINANCE
A PROPOSED GENERAL ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 43 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF YONKERS ENTITLED “ZONING” IN REGARDS TO THE CLEAR CUTTING AND EXCAVATION OF LAND PRIOR TO REQUIRED SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
The ordinance, a summary of which is published herewith, has been adopted on June 4, 2024, and approved by the Mayor on June 11, 2024, and the validity of the obligations authorized by such ordinance may be hereafter contested only if such obligations were authorized for an object or purpose for which the CITY OF YONKERS, in the County of Westchester, New York, is not authorized to expend money or if the provisions of law which should have been complied with as of the date of publication of this Notice were not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the publication of this Notice, or such obligations were authorized in violation of the provisions of the constitution.
Vincent E. Spano City Clerk City of Yonkers, New York SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO. 35-2024
BOND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YONKERS, NEW YORK AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF BOOKS AND EQUIPMENT FOR USE BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION; STATING THE ESTIMATED MAXIMUM COST THEREOF IS $5,400,000; APPROPRIATING SAID AMOUNT THEREFOR; AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF SAID CITY IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $5,400,000 TO FINANCE SAID APPROPRIATION
The bonds are authorized to finance the acquisition of books and equipment for use by the Board of Education. The amount of obligations to be issued is not to exceed $5,400,000.
The period of probable usefulness of the acquisition of books, software and equipment for use by the Board of Education, is five (5) years.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 17 of the Special Local Finance and Budget Act of the City of Yonkers, constituting Chapters 488 and 489 of the Laws of 1976 of the State of New York (herein called the “Act”), the City is authorized and directed to include the pledge and agreement of the State of New York (herein called the “State”) contained in said Section 17 of the Act, in the ordinance, and the Act provides that upon payment for the bonds or notes by the original and all subsequent holders thereof the inclusion of such pledge and agreement shall be deemed conclusive evidence of valuable consideration received by the State and City for such pledge and agreement and of reliance upon such pledge and agreement by any holder and that any action by the State contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of such pledge and agreement shall be void.
A complete copy of the Bond Ordinance summarized above shall be available for public inspection during normal business hours at the office of the City Clerk, 40 South Broadway, Yonkers, New York 10701.
The ordinance, a summary of which is published herewith, has been adopted on June 4, 2024, and approved by the Mayor on June 11, 2024, and the validity of the obligations authorized by such ordinance may be hereafter contested only if such obligations were authorized for an object or purpose for which the CITY OF YONKERS, in the County of Westchester, New York, is not authorized to expend money or if the provisions of law which should have been complied with as of the date of publication of this Notice were not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the publication of this Notice, or such obligations were authorized in violation of the provisions of the constitution.
Vincent E. Spano, City Clerk
City of Yonkers, New York
SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO.37-2024
BOND ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YONKERS, NEW YORK AUTHORIZING FUNDING FOR VARIOUS CAPITAL PROJECTS INCLUDED IN THE CITY’S 2024-2025 CAPITAL BUDGET, AS AMENDED; STATING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED MAXIMUM COST THEREOF IS $48,533,086; APPROPRIATING SAID AMOUNT THEREFOR; AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OF SAID CITY IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $48,533,086 TO FINANCE SAID APPROPRIATION
The bonds are authorized to finance various capital projects included in the City’s 2024-2025 Capital Budget, as amended.
The amount of obligations to be issued is $48,533,086.
The periods of usefulness are various periods from 3 to 40 years.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 17 of the Special Local Finance and Budget Act of the City of Yonkers, constituting Chapters 488 and 489 of the Laws of 1976 of the State of New York (herein called the “Act”), the City is authorized and directed to include the pledge and agreement of the State of New York (herein called the “State”) contained in said Section 17 of the Act, in the ordinance, and the Act provides that upon payment for the bonds or notes by the original and all subsequent holders thereof the inclusion of such pledge and agreement shall be deemed conclusive evidence of valuable consideration received by the State and City for such pledge and agreement and of reliance upon such pledge and agreement by any holder and that any action by the State contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of such pledge and agreement shall be void.
A complete copy of the Bond Ordinance summarized above shall be available for public inspection during normal business hours at the office of the City Clerk, 40 South Broadway, Yonkers, New York 10701.
