Home Blog Page 134

Voices Amplified: Social Media’s Role in the LGBTQ+ Community by Dennis Richmond, Jr.

0

In today’s digital age, platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) are revolutionizing how LGBTQ+ voices are heard and amplified. These spaces are not just for selfies and memes; they are vital tools for education, community building, and activism, transforming the landscape for marginalized groups in unprecedented ways.

TikTok has become a beacon for LGBTQ+ youth, allowing creators to share their journeys with a global audience through engaging short-form videos. Whether it’s coming-out stories, discussions about gender identity, or humorous takes on queer life, users are discovering community and representation like never before. Hashtags like #LGBTQ, #TransJoy, and #NonBinaryVisibility connect millions, fostering a sense of belonging among young people navigating their identities.

Cienna Rosalina, a Yonkers native approaching nearly a quarter million followers on TikTok, highlights this shift: “Social media has significantly broadened the audience that LGBTQ+ activists can reach compared to the past. Activism used to be confined to protests and local events, but now it has a global stage.” Cienna points out that for those in isolated or non-affirming environments, these platforms provide essential connections, offering support and validation that can be life-changing.

Instagram plays a crucial role in visual storytelling for advocacy. Activists and organizations use its capabilities to spotlight pressing issues facing the LGBTQ+ community, from anti-trans legislation to mental health awareness. The platform’s Stories and Reels features allow for quick dissemination of information and organization of events, while profile pronouns promote inclusivity.

Twitter, known for its immediacy, serves as a rallying point for LGBTQ+ activism. Users can quickly spotlight breaking news and engage in real-time discussions about crucial issues. Campaigns like #BlackTransLivesMatter gained traction here, highlighting the intersections of race and gender identity. Twitter fosters solidarity, enabling users to support one another and mobilize around urgent causes.

Despite its power, the digital landscape is not without challenges. Many LGBTQ+ creators face harassment and algorithmic bias, and censorship remains a threat. Yet, the potential for social media to amplify marginalized voices is undeniable. As these platforms evolve, so too will the ways in which queer individuals advocate for acceptance, equality, and joy.

Nekia Zulu, another prominent voice in the community, emphasizes the transformative impact of social media. “It’s pivotal in bringing the LGBTQIA+ community out of the shadows of taboo,” she says. “Now, you can find stylists, artists, and advocates who have always been part of this world but were hidden away.” Social media allows these individuals to be recognized for their talents, from fashion to music, and shine a light on injustices faced by the community.

As we navigate the complexities of the digital age, social media remains a lifeline for the LGBTQ+ community, facilitating connection, education, and activism. While the journey has its hurdles, the collective strength and resilience displayed online is a powerful testament to the community’s ongoing fight for equality. For many, social media isn’t just a platform; it’s a home.

PBP Radio Episode 411 – Black Men Push back: The Democratic Party’s Relationship With Black Men

Black Westchester presents The People Before Politics Radio Show Episode 411 with ya hosts Damon K. Jones and AJ Woodson giving you that Real Talk For The Community since 2014. In the latest episode of Black Westchester’s “People Before Politics” Radio Show, hosts Damon K. Jones and AJ Woodson delved into the complex relationship between Black men and the Democratic Party. The discussion was sparked by former President Barack Obama’s recent comments criticizing Black men for not supporting Vice President Kamala Harris based on her gender.

Key Points of Discussion: Obama’s Lecture: Obama suggested that Black men were not supporting Harris primarily because she was a woman. They argued that this oversimplification ignores legitimate policy concerns.

Policy Over Identity: Jones and Woodson emphasized the importance of substantive policy discussions over identity politics. They noted that many Black men are looking for concrete plans from Democrats to address issues affecting their communities.

Specific Concerns: The show highlighted several areas where Black men feel the Democratic Party has fallen short, including Economic opportunities, Criminal justice reform, Education, Healthcare access

Call for Honest Dialogue: Both hosts stressed the need for the Democratic Party to engage in genuine, policy-focused conversations with Black male voters, rather than relying on assumptions or guilt tactics.

Voter Agency: The discussion underscored the growing political independence of Black male voters, who are increasingly willing to withhold support from candidates who don’t address their specific concerns.

Black Westchester presents the People Before Politics Radio Show every Sunday night, 6-8 PM, simulcasting live on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube and archived on BlackWestchester.com. Giving you that Real Talk For The Community since 2014.

To support the Black Westchester and the People Before Politics Radio Show, which provides the News With The Black Point Of view and gives you the real talk for the community for free, make a donation via PayPal at www.PayPal.me/BlackWestchesterMag. In the words of Ray Charles, “One of these days, and it [might not be] long, You’re gonna look for [us], and [we’ll] be gone.” Support independent, Black-free media!

As always, you can follow us on Facebook, InstagramLinkedIn, and YouTube

Contributions and Donations can be made via PayPal.

A New Hope For Justice: Police Accountability

0

On July 23, 2024, I visited the Mount Vernon Police Department to make a domestic incident report. As an active participant in the Address Confidentiality Program (ACP), I requested that my protected address should be redacted from the report before it is shared with another agency for review. This was necessary for the report to be reviewed by their District Attorney’s Office in connection with an ongoing case involving the offending party.

In addition, I notified reporting officer Velasquez that the offending party had prior knowledge of my protected address here in Mount Vernon. Unfortunately, the report was generated with my full address included which is a direct violation of the ACP pursuant to N.Y Executive Law section 108, which legally allows me to substitute my protected address for the one that is granted to me by this program.

The Address Confidentiality Program (ACP), was established to protect victims of domestic violence by authorizing the use of a designated address granted by the program. This right to legally substitute your address by the ACP can only be waived by the Secretary of State after the agency does its due diligence to verify that the agency in question requesting the protected address has a bona fide need to incorporate the protected address and that the agency cannot change its internal procedures to meet that need.

Such agency is then required to receive a waiver that specifically grants them authority to request the confidential participant’s address and if this confidential information is being shared to another agency, then that agency must also request the authority to exchange the protected information.

The Mount Vernon Police Department failed to abide by the ACP’s protocols and violated Penal Law § 60.3 by failing to redact identifying information of domestic violence victims from reports, including names, addresses, and contact information.

This free program serves thousands of New Yorkers such as myself to alleviate us by granting protection from our perpetrators and help save lives.

But this breach of confidentiality has unfortunately caused me a significant amount of emotional distress including increased feelings of anxiety and depression requiring medication and a reasonable fear for my safety as I am uncertain whether my protected address was shared or leaked to the offending party.

In pursuit of a resolution, I visited the Mount Vernon police department and There was a meeting with Captain Gregory Addison, Captain Michael Goldman, and Deputy Chief Steven Sexton about my concerns on August 29, 2024.

Captain Gregory Addison and Deputy Chief Steven Sexton acknowledged that the issues I raised stemmed from a lack of knowledge and understanding of the law, and apologized for ‘The inconvenience caused by their department’s actions.’

Specifically, they recognized that their failure to investigate promptly and protect my confidentiality was a result of ignorance and a lack of training on relevant laws and procedures in New York State.

Deputy Chief Sexton assured me that the Department will be implementing additional training to ensure that officers and staff understand and comply with the laws and procedures in question.

Although the Police department acknowledged the costly mistake by one of its officers, this meeting did not offer any resolution.

On September 17, 2024, in hopes of rectifying the confidentiality breach by the Mount Vernon Police Department, I formally requested directed patrol near my protected address via email to Commissioner David Gibson and Deputy Commissioner Jennifer Lackard. The Chief of Police, Marcel Olifier responded to my email request and asked ‘Other than being in fear, why exactly are you requesting the directed patrol?’ He continued to state that he could not guarantee the directed patrol due to ‘call volume or other police service requests.’

The fact that it has been three months and I am left with no rectification to my dispute and concerns, only to face further delays and uncertainty, is a clear indication of the systemic failures and lack of support for victims of domestic violence.

It’s egregious how Mount Vernon treats survivors and victims of Domestic Violence and I can only imagine how so many others may have felt who do not know how to navigate through the legal system to get their needs met and their voices heard as I do.

The Mount Vernon Police Department took an oath to protect and serve its City’s residents but has been consecutively downplaying and neglecting my safety concerns and violating my rights as a United States citizen due to the lack of knowledge of relevant and current laws in place for New York State Domestic Violence victims.

As a long-time resident, I have always strived to make a positive impact in our City. However, the department’s failure to protect my confidentiality and mishandling of my case has caused me significant harm and distress.

Since this incident, I have become a certified Human Rights Consultant through the U.S Institute of Diplomacy and Human Rights and have been meeting with other marginalized members of the community who have faced the same challenges as the Mount Vernon Police Department to advise them of their rights as residents in Mount Vernon, New York.

If you or anyone you know, has been mistreated by the Mount Vernon Police Department and would be interested in a free consultation with me, please see below for my contact information.

The Misguided Myth of Black Male Defection—and Why Democrats Must Start Listening to Black Men

In recent years, a narrative has emerged suggesting that Black male voters are abandoning the Democratic Party in favor of the GOP. This storyline, fueled by selective polling data and a few high-profile endorsements, paints a picture of a mass exodus that doesn’t exist. While there has been a slight uptick in Republican support, this perspective ignores a broader truth: most Black male voters continue to align with the Democratic Party, motivated by enduring issues of civil rights, social justice, and economic fairness.

Black men have historically supported Democratic candidates, as demonstrated in recent elections. In 2012, more than 90% of Black men voted for Barack Obama, and in 2016, over 80% supported Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump gained around 13% of the Black male vote in 2016, but this was far from a seismic shift. In 2020, most Black men cast their ballots for Joe Biden, even as Trump’s share modestly increased to 18%. These numbers indicate not a defection but a deep loyalty to Democratic principles—despite areas where Black men feel their needs are being overlooked.

The recent comments by former President Obama, suggesting that Black men might be less enthusiastic about voting for Kamala Harris simply because she’s a woman, underscore a lack of understanding about what truly drives Black male voters. This assertion is not only unfounded but also disrespectful to a demographic that has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to the Democratic Party, even under challenging circumstances. Black men rallied around Hillary Clinton in 2016 despite her controversial comments about young Black men as “predators,” prioritizing the broader stakes over any personal offense. And in Georgia’s 2018 gubernatorial race, Black men turned out in record numbers to support Stacey Abrams, showing strong enthusiasm for a Black female candidate in a race that highlighted critical issues for their communities.

The 2020 Westchester Democratic Congressional Primary between George Latimer and Jamaal Bowman is a telling example of why Black men feel increasingly disrespected within the Democratic Party. Bowman, a progressive Black educator, faced blatant disrespect from within his party, as he was accused live in a debate of only representing Black and Brown interests. The accusation struck a deep nerve—after all, if a Black man can be demeaned and diminished for advocating for Black and Brown communities, what place do Black men truly have in the Democratic Party? This primary wasn’t just a local skirmish; it reflected broader tensions and a wake-up call to the national Democratic leadership. As the saying goes, the chickens have come home to roost, and the national party must reckon with this disconnect.

So, what issues resonate most with Black male voters? These voters consistently prioritize policies around racial justice, healthcare, and economic opportunity—critical to their communities. However, for Black men, the Democratic Party’s focus on civil rights and social justice needs to expand to address some long-standing and largely neglected concerns. Economic inequality, educational disparities, and the need for comprehensive healthcare and mental health services are essential priorities for Black men.

Additionally, reparations for slavery and systemic discrimination are pressing issues for many Black men, who view them as necessary steps toward rectifying historical injustices. The Democratic Party, however, has been unclear and inconsistent on where it stands regarding reparations, often offering vague support without actionable steps or a concrete plan. For Black men, reparations are not just a symbolic issue; they represent real economic redress for centuries of injustice. A failure to address this seriously risks sending the message that the Democratic Party is not committed to pursuing equity for Black Americans.

Foreign policy is an area of growing concern, especially given that Black men make up 21% of active-duty Army personnel. Conflicts like the current Israel-Gaza war raise serious questions about the government’s spending priorities. Black men see billions of dollars poured into overseas conflicts while critical programs in their communities remain chronically underfunded. This lack of investment leads to limited job opportunities and low wages, factors that often drive Black men to enlist in the military as one of the few paths to economic stability.

This troubling disconnect between federal spending priorities and the urgent needs of Black communities leaves Black neighborhoods without sufficient investment in initiatives like job training, school funding, and healthcare access. Many Black men who have served or have family members currently serving rightfully question why there are always funds for foreign wars but seemingly none for the systemic challenges faced by Black communities at home.

Upon returning home, Black veterans frequently struggle with homelessness and mental health issues, highlighting a glaring lack of support services. Like many others who serve, these veterans have sacrificed for their country, only to find that the country they fought for is unprepared to support them. As they navigate a system that fails to address their basic needs, they are left asking why resources are consistently directed abroad while domestic crises go unaddressed.

The Democratic Party should recognize that Black men experience higher levels of unemployment and underemployment compared to their peers of other ethnicities. They are less likely to find jobs that offer the wages necessary to support a family, and vocational training programs, which could provide pathways to stable, well-paying jobs, are often lacking. Many Black men find themselves navigating an education system that has historically underfunded schools in Black neighborhoods. These inequities not only limit opportunities for personal advancement but also challenge Black men’s ability to fulfill roles as respected heads of households. On average, Black men continue to earn the lowest wages of any demographic group, and their struggles are compounded by healthcare disparities and the severe underfunding of mental health services in their communities.

Despite overwhelming support for the Democratic Party, Black men continue to face unchecked police brutality and extrajudicial killings in cities across the country—many of which are governed by Democratic leadership. In these cities, where promises of reform are common, real accountability for police violence against Black men remains elusive. The tragic reality is that police killings of Black men have become more American than apple pie.

Time and again, Black men see their communities protest, petition, and demand change, only to witness minimal or ineffective reforms. Democratic leaders who speak passionately about social justice often fail to enact meaningful policies to address police violence, leaving Black men vulnerable to a system that does not protect them. Despite high-profile cases that temporarily bring attention to the issue, real systemic change remains painfully out of reach.

And yet, Black men continue to show up at the polls, casting their votes overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates. They persist in believing that the Democratic Party offers a pathway toward justice, even as their pleas for police accountability often go unheard. Black men’s steadfast support reflects a deep faith in the possibility of change—a faith that has not wavered despite their countless injustices. But this loyalty should not be mistaken for complacency. Black men deserve more than symbolic gestures; they need real policy action that addresses police violence and brings accountability to law enforcement. The Democratic Party must not take Black men’s votes for granted. It must earn them by committing to substantial reforms that protect Black lives and honor the unwavering support Black men have given, year after year.

For years, these concerns have not received the attention they deserve, but Black men have remained steadfast in their support of the Democratic Party. Despite the health and mental healthcare crises they face, Black men continue to vote for Democratic candidates, driven by a commitment to principles that, on the whole, align with the Party’s platform. However, their loyalty should not be taken for granted. The Democratic Party must not only recognize but address these economic, healthcare, and educational disparities if it hopes to retain Black men’s support. Black men need tangible solutions that help lift their communities, provide good jobs, and offer comprehensive healthcare, including mental health resources.

Furthermore, comments like Obama’s, especially from a respected figure, risk alienating a critical voter base by trivializing their concerns. Black men have repeatedly demonstrated that they support candidates based on policy and principles, not stereotypes. These voters are savvy, engaged, and aware of the broader stakes. The notion that Black men are abandoning the Democratic Party is largely an exaggeration, one that ignores the issues that drive Black men’s voting decisions. Rather than allowing this narrative to persist, it is time for the Democratic Party to listen to Black men’s concerns and work to implement policies that create meaningful change. Doing so is not only a matter of political strategy but a necessary step toward honoring the loyalty and contributions of Black men to the Democratic coalition.

The next time someone claims that Black men are turning their backs on the Democratic Party, remember to look beyond the headlines. Black men are telling a story of commitment—not to a party but to a set of principles. Yet, they also send a clear message: their votes are earned by action, not expectation. The Democratic Party would do well to take heed, as Black men remain ready to support candidates who truly see and address their needs.

Obama’s Challenge Misses the Mark: Black Men Want Substance, Not Guilt or Shame

As a Black man, I’m deeply troubled by former President Obama’s recent comments suggesting that Black men lack enthusiasm for Vice President Kamala Harris because we may not want to see a woman in leadership.

He stated, “My understanding, based on reports I’m getting from campaigns and communities, is that we have not yet seen the same kinds of energy and turnout in all quarters of our neighborhoods and communities as we saw when I was running.” President Obama then went on to lecture Black men about their lack of support for Harris. “Part of it makes me think—and I’m speaking to men directly—part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives, and other reasons for that.”

This implication isn’t just reductive—it’s offensive. It reduces our political choices to stereotypes and undermines the validity of our concerns.

As a 56-year-old Black man, a retired Correction Officer, and a Business Owner with a Black mother, a Black wife, a Black daughter, and two Black granddaughters, I find it insulting to suggest that I, or other Black men, harbor some hidden animosity toward Black women simply because we may not feel enthusiastic about Harris’s candidacy. My life is filled with strong Black women I deeply love and respect. My political preferences are shaped by the issues that matter most to me and my community, not by some imagined reluctance to support a woman in leadership.

For many of us, the lack of excitement about Harris goes beyond her gender—it’s about her record, her policies, and how we believe she will impact our communities. This isn’t about rejecting her as a Black woman; it’s about holding the Democratic Party accountable and expecting more than just the usual rhetoric aimed at making history. We’ve been down this road before, I still have my Obama t-shirt, and symbolism alone isn’t enough—we need an assurance of real, substantive change. Black communities need tangible commitments, not just the promise of hope.

It’s disappointing that Obama, someone I’ve always respected for his integrity, would use this approach—painting Black men as obstacles to progress simply because we’re asking for more from the Democratic Party that claims to represent us. We should be able to challenge our leaders and demand better without being shamed or mischaracterized. Unfortunately, it seems like this has become part of the Democratic culture: shaming people into voting for someone, and if we disagree on key issues, labeling us as Trump supporters instead of engaging in real, honest conversations about policies. We need to discuss how these policies affect Black manhood, Black boys, Black families, and Black communities. Instead of guilt tactics, let’s have open dialogues that respect diverse perspectives within our community.

Furthermore, Black men are tired. We are tired of being the last priority. We are tired of being emasculated, tired of broken and failing school systems, tired of watching our families fracture, and tired of being racially profiled and killed by police. We are exhausted by a system that has stepped on us for decades and continues to tell us to be hopeful about a better tomorrow while we’re catching hell today. No, Mr. Obama, this isn’t about Black men lacking enthusiasm for Kamala Harris simply because she’s a woman. It’s about Black men not seeing their place or future in what the Democratic Party is offering. Let us make no mistake: Black men have been in this fight with Black women since we were brought here on slave ships. Like my mother always said, we also know that not all skinfolk are kinfolk! We deserve leaders who will speak to our needs and respect our experiences, not dismiss our concerns as a lack of support for progress.

Black men aren’t demanding the impossible; we’re asking for respect, representation, and real solutions to our challenges. We want more than vague promises and symbolic gestures—we want substantive, meaningful change. And we have every right to demand that without being criticized or misrepresented. We can support the party while expecting it to deliver on its promises.

Let’s be clear: just because we may not be sold on Harris doesn’t mean we’re voting for Donald Trump. The Democratic Party has long portrayed Trump as the face of racism. Still, systemic racism existed long before he arrived on the scene, and it exists within the Democratic Party as well. Have we forgotten the subtle, and sometimes not-so-subtle, racism that Obama himself and his family endured from members of his party? Black men aren’t blind to these realities, and we have every right to question candidates and policies, even within our political camp.

For generations, Black people have shown extraordinary loyalty to the Democratic Party. Over 90% of Black voters—93% to be exact—cast their ballots for Democratic candidates in recent elections. This steadfast support has been a bedrock of the Democratic coalition, yet one has to ask: where is the return on this loyalty? After decades of unwavering support, as a Black man, the benefits to the Black community often seem minimal, if not invisible. The frustration with the Democratic Party’s lack of accountability is palpable, and the need for change is urgent.

When the Democratic Party overlooks Black-owned firms in favor of established, predominantly white firms, it sends a message: Black voices are critical enough to count on for votes but not for influencing campaign strategy or receiving a fair share of the 1.4 billion economic pie in political consulting. By excluding Black-owned consulting firms, the party misses out on cultural insights, diverse perspectives, and authentic messaging that could better resonate with the Black community and beyond. Black consultants bring more than expertise; they get a lived understanding of the challenges and aspirations within their communities. To ignore this is not only shortsighted but a disservice to both the party and the people who support it.

The Democratic Party has taken the Black vote for granted for decades, expecting our loyalty without consistently delivering on its promises. Our skepticism is not rejecting women or embracing the alternative—it’s a call for accountability and representation. We deserve the freedom to form independent political views and to challenge leaders who fail to meet our needs. This call for accountability is not a rejection of a Black woman but a demand for the Democratic Party to live up to its promises and truly represent us. The need for the Democratic Party to live up to its promises is not just a desire; it’s a fundamental expectation.

To shame us into support is counterproductive and disrespectful. We need leaders who will engage with us honestly and listen to our concerns rather than resorting to guilt tactics. Our perspectives deserve acknowledgment and respect, not dismissal and criticism. The Democratic Party needs to understand that Black people, and Black men in particular, are not a monolith; we should be valued as complex individuals who care deeply about our communities, families, and futures. If the party wants our support, it needs to work on earning it—not assuming it. The demand for respectful dialogue is not just a request; it’s a necessity for a more inclusive political discourse.

A Success Primer For Young Black Men Part 1 by Mike Ramey

A few years back, I had been blessed to teach about Bible Prophecy for Teens in a local church, during Vacation Bible School. I had one young brother in my class for the week. He was about 14 years old. Of course, I was disappointed with the fact that I only had one student. Many of the other classes aimed at teens had more ‘bells and whistles’, more exciting subjects and were better attended. However, as The Lord brought to my remembrance God is not concerned about ‘quantity’, but about ‘quality’.

Just ask Gideon! Just ask the 12 disciples—who turned this world upside down for Jesus!

Everything has a reason and a season. THIS young brother—sent to VBS by his grandmother—was smart as a whip and was eager to learn. He had questions about the subject matter; about Jesus Christ, about Catholicism, Islam, and how they compared with the KJV Bible. His questions put me through my teaching ‘paces’. I trust that I encouraged him to further examine his faith as much as he encouraged me with his questions!

The week was soon over. It was time for class presentations, which took place on a Friday evening. One teen class had made a ‘Christian Rap’ video. Another teen class had put together a visual display about modern topics and Christianity. My one student came to the front of the congregation, and clearly laid out what he had learned for the week—and put the other teen classes to shame! His presentation was so powerful that during the altar call given by the Pastor, his grandmother JOINED the church!

Now, you would think that Pastor and the other teen instructors were happy about that event. They weren’t. In fact, they were downright chilly towards me, and my young student. Why? Because a young Black man got to the meat of Christianity, while the other teens—along with their teachers—were content with ‘having fun and making friends’ rather than learning—and being taught—life lessons about the Scriptures. In short, the other teachers (and the Pastor) were upset because the young brother chose NOT to exist on the ‘frosting and candy’ of the VBS education structure and went STRAIGHT for the meat of the Word of God.

Unfortunately, this is being played out in many other education and program venues aimed at young Black men today—much to the miseducation and destruction of young brothers. Too many young Black men are being offered ‘frosting and candy’ while more substance and encouragement is being offered to others—including young Black women. In short, young Black men are being ‘hobbled’ in the areas of reading, writing, arithmetic, the KJV Bible and Black History while MORE efforts are being poured into other races—even Illegal Aliens—about how to be successful in life.

One cannot neglect the spiritual IF one is interested in truly reaching our young men.

While preparing this weekly series, an interesting item surfaced in the New York Post entitled: “Gen Z grads are tanking job interviews, struggling to find full time positions: study”. In short, when it comes to the current generation being prepared and ready for job interviewing, proper social graces, and the ability to know how to speak and dress well to apply for a job, many Gen Z (and soon Gen A) grads know how to use ‘the latest’ in technology, but they are WOEFULLY untrained in how to compete for a full-time job. Yes, I understand that there are ‘exceptions to the rule’ when it comes to job hunting…BUT, learning how to present oneself for employment begins with skills that SHOULD have been taught in the HOME and reinforced in schools!

One cannot expect our young men to be successful IF they are not given the right tools.

My time is short, so, let’s wrap up the first portion of my success primer for my young brothers with a few pointers. First, realize that you do NOT have to ask for anyone’s permission to be successful in life: You must ‘stoke your OWN fires’ and hang out with people and programs that will guide you to a ‘successful path’ in life. Feeding your spirit with social media four or five hours a day IS harmful. Picking up and reading a KJV Bible or other books of substance will do wonders for your ‘brain pan’ and sharpen your mind to become an achiever, rather than a lump on the couch.

Let me drop in this comment at this point: A program with most of its emphasis on field trips rather than academic and spiritual substance is a program to be avoided at all costs. A program that seems content to let the participants ‘coast’ rather than learn how to compete is a mismanagement and waste of your time, my young brother.

Do you realize why board games are making a comeback? Those games encourage reading, math, study, and strategy. Those games encourage you to THINK rather than let something programmed by AI do your thinking for you. Learn how to think, and achievement is easy!

Here’s some powerful advice from author, columnist and former college Dean, Tony Brown: “Learn how to speak and write the King’s English; this is needed for food, shelter, and clothing in our society. Feel free to speak whatever you want AWAY from the job.” Brown has LONG been one of my heroes. He has several books in print and online. Check him out!

Let Black women teach young Black women. Successful Black men must invest in building successful young Black men—NOT weak young Black males. Some like to say it’s a ‘skin’ problem. From a biblical point of view, it is a SIN problem—which is why time spent in a KJV Bible is an investment that has far reaching—and lasting benefits. If the Lord will, I’ll be spending this year laying out a success trail, clearly marked for my young brothers in this monthly series. Bookmark it and pass it on!

Ramey’s Recommended reading this week: “In The Trenches” by Reggie White.

“A whining, crying race may be pitied…but seldom respected.” Booker T. Washington.

Pete Rock And Common Release Mini-Documentary, ‘The Auditorium Vol.1’

Common and Pete Rock have released a short film chronicling the making of their critically acclaimed project, The Auditorium Vol. 1, Jayquan reported on RocktheBells.com, on Wednesday, October 9th. “This is what I was born for, this is what I live for, this is what brings me some of the greatest joy in my life,” Common says in the film’s intro. “That being said, I knew that I was inspired to do an album that would have the spirit of what we know to be pure soulful, Boom Bap Hip Hop.”

The 15-minute Vevo-produced project includes performances and behind-the-scenes footage. Pete says, “I prepared my ears for this kind of thing.” No matter how a music sounds, I’ll be able to notice the elements because I can detect what’s absent. When we are sampling and chopping, it’s similar to assembling a jigsaw. The parts can be matched. Watch the documentary below.

Common and Pete Rock collaborated on their studio album, The Auditorium Vol. 1. It was Common’s fourth album published under Loma Vista Recordings when it was released on July 12, 2024. With co-production from Tuamie and guest appearances from Jennifer Hudson, PJ, Posdnuos, Bilal, and others, Pete Rock served as the album’s sole producer.

Pete Rock’s production has propelled million-selling, chart-topping, award-winning hits from Nas, Public Enemy, The Notorious B.I.G., and Kanye West to Mick Jagger, Mary J. Blige, Madonna, and Lady Gaga; and his signature style—collage compositions imbued with complex harmony and melody—makes him one of the most influential and innovative figures in the history of popular music. Multi-hyphenate rapper-actor-producer-author-activist Common has created an unparalleled body of work: 15 landmark albums, standout performances in films from “American Gangster” and “Just Wright” to “Selma” and “The Hate U Give,” and most recently on Broadway performing in “Between Riverside and Crazy” and coproducing the revival of “The Wiz.” His Primetime Emmy, three Grammys, and Oscar for Best Original Song mean that Common has now transcended his EGO and is already shopping for a T that fits.

Yet this producer and MC, though they traveled in the same creative circles and soul group for three decades, collaborated only two times—on a notable song they made together in 1994 and another in 1998. Given their independent, interstellar trajectories, there was no reason their paths should cross, until Common’s course was altered by the gravity of a big event: the Hip-Hop 50th Anniversary concert at Yankee Stadium in August 2023. Common was a featured performer, but his epiphany came as a fan: “I stood out in that crowd and watched for five-and-a-half hours. I’ve never done that in my life. Just to see EPMD, to see Lil Kim, to see Mobb Deep, Snoop, Ice Cube, Run DMC, Nas, Lauryn Hill, and Fat Joe. It just made me realize how much I love the art form. It made me want to rap.”

The next month, Common found himself in Pete Rock’s studio north of New York City. “We caught up with each other and I just started playing music,” says Pete. In those first moments, the two highly-favored sons of hip-hop realized they were coming from a similar place of gratitude and enthusiasm for the genre. Common recalls thinking: “We don’t have to reach to make it sound like a throwback. We don’t have to reach to try to make it sound like it’s new and young. We’ve just got to be who we are and do what we love.” Then came Common’s second, more urgent realization: “I can’t wait to leave here and go write.”

“We just became glued to each other,” Pete says. “The recording process wasn’t long at all. It took about a couple of weeks to get the first five songs done. And the way we finished it was heroic.”

Though Pete experienced the pace of their work as brisk, Common remembers the time as one of intense deliberation. “It took time for Pete to dig into these records and find the right sample,” Common says. “Sometimes he would hook it up right then and there, but sometimes he waited ‘till he felt it was the right time and the right expression. And it’s that time, that care, that diligence that comes through in the music that we make.”

Common wrote steadily, recording his vocals in the familiar sanctum of Electric Lady Studios. Several more visits, a back and forth of ideas over text and phone, and the 15 tracks of The Auditorium, Vol. 1 coalesced. “I was reaching for the euphoria of what we did in the 90s, but updated,” Pete says. “The feel of the album is 90s, but it’s not 90s at all. It’s new music.” 

You can cop your copy of “The Auditorium, Vol 1” on their website or anywhere music is sold! #SupportRealHipHop!

Congressional 17 District Race Up For Grabs According To Recent Poll

1

New Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill surveys of New York’s 17th and 18th congressional districts find close elections for the two US House seats.

In the race for Congress in the lower Hudson Valley‘s 17th district (which includes all of Rockland and  Putnam County, as well as most of Northern Westchester County, and portions of southern Dutchess County) 45% support incumbent Republican Congressman Michael Lawler, while 44% support former congressman Mondaire Jones. Three percent support Working Families Party Anthony Frascone, and 7% are undecided.

“Mondaire Jones is leading among young voters under 40, 51% to 40%, and those in their 40s, 45% to 41%, but trails among voters over 50, 49% to 40%,” Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, said. “The Working Families Party candidate also pulls 6% among voters under 40.”

Lawler has a 47% favorable rating in the district, while 40% have an unfavorable view of him. Thirteen percent are not familiar with him. Jones has a 40% favorable rating, while 40% have an unfavorable view of him. Twenty percent are not familiar with Jones. 

Lawler’s razor-thin 1-point lead is within the survey’s plus or minus 3.8 percent margin of error, which means the race is up for grabs.

Mondaire Jones was first elected in 2020 to succeed the retiring Representative Nita Lowey. In the aftermath of the 2020 redistricting cycle, 18th district incumbent Sean Patrick Maloney announced his intention to run in the new 17th district instead of his existing seat; Jones subsequently opted to run in the 10th district to avoid a primary fight. However, Maloney lost to Republican Mike Lawler in the general election; Lawler subsequently became the first of his party to win this seat since 1981.

In a separate Emerson College poll just north in the 18th District (includes all of Orange County, and most of Dutchess and Ulster Counties. The district includes the cities of Newburgh, Beacon, Kingston, and Poughkeepsie) Democratic Rep. Pat Ryan leads Republican rival Alison Espito 48% to 43%, with nearly 10 percent undecided. That’s just outside the margin of error, still a competitive race.

“There is a sharp gender divide in the 18th district: men break for Esposito 52% to 40%, while women break for Ryan, 54% to 34%,” Kimball added. 

A majority of voters (52%) have a favorable view of Ryan, while 37% have an unfavorable view of him and 11% are not familiar with the congressman. Forty-seven percent have a favorable view of Esposito, while 30% have an unfavorable view of her. 

The presidential election is neck-and-neck in both NY17 and 18. In the 17th district, 49% support Kamala Harris, and 49% support Donald Trump for president. In the 18th district, 48% support Donald Trump, while 47% support Harris. 

The top issue for NY17 voters is the economy (32%), followed by immigration (20%), housing affordability (13%), crime (11%), and threats to democracy (10%). The top issue for NY18 voters is the economy (39%), housing affordability (16%), immigration (14%), threats to democracy (11%), and crime (6%). 

Voters were asked if the number of migrants seeking sanctuary in the United States is a crisis, a problem but not a crisis, or not a problem at all. A majority of voters in both districts think it is a crisis: 56% in NY17 and 53% in NY18. Thirty-four percent in NY17 and 35% in NY18 think it is a problem but not a crisis, while 10% in NY17 and 13% in NY18 think it is not a problem at all. 

Both contests are among 7 competitive House races in New York’s suburbs and upstate that could determine which party controls the House of Representatives.

Mount Vernon City School District Will Hold Community Career Fair

The Mount Vernon City School District (MVCSD) will hold a career fair on Thursday, October 17, 2024. The career fair, open to high school students and the community, will feature jobs from within the school district, local employers, and the New York State Department of Labor.

The career fair will be held on Thursday, October 17th, from 3 to 5 p.m. at Mount Vernon High School, 100 California Road, Mount Vernon. Please share with all young people who may be looking for a job or career!

Crisis at the New Rochelle Police Department By the Editorial Board of New RoAR News

3

Is Anyone Taking This Seriously?

Facts:

On  June 5, 2020, New Rochelle Police Officer Alec McKenna shot and killed Kamal Flowers, a Black resident of New Rochelle, under suspicious circumstances.  Officer McKenna had followed a car in which Flowers was a passenger from downtown until the car stopped on Potter Avenue.  Flowers then got out of the car and ran onto a dark side street.  Officer McKenna followed him and killed him.  There were no witnesses.  McKenna said Flowers threatened him with a gun.  The video from a neighboring building was inconclusive. An internal NRPD investigation found that McKenna followed all standard procedures, but it did not explain why McKenna followed the car or why he chased Flowers—a passenger, not the driver—when he ran away, setting up a fatal confrontation.  McKenna remains on the force.

On the afternoon of July 3, 2023, NRPD Detective Steven Conn shot and killed Jarrell Garris, a Black New Rochelle native, in front of St. Catherine AME Zion Church on Lincoln Avenue.  Garris had allegedly eaten some fruit at the nearby New Rochelle Farms market and left without paying.  Both the store owner and Detective Conn noted before the shooting that Garris appeared to be having mental health issues.  Two officers were talking with Garris who was quietly walking away, when Conn arrived on the scene, ran over, placed a handcuff on Garris, punched him in the face, and, along with another officer, wrestled him to the ground.  When Garris appeared to reach for the other officer’s holstered gun, Conn shot him in the neck.  An investigation by the New York State Attorney General found that Conn could likely justify the shooting in court as “self-defense,” but criticized Conn’s needless use of physical force to restrain Garris and the NRPD’s training on managing people with mental health issues who are accused of “petty offenses.”  Conn remains on the force and faces an internal investigation by the NRPD.  The NRPD police union issued a statement calling Garris a “violent criminal” and blaming him for his own death.

On May 29, 2024, NRPD Lieutenant Sean Kane, the leader of the Special Investigations Unit, videotaped himself handling a bag of white powder in his patrol car just before finding a similar bag under the car of Ivin Harper, a Black New Rochelle native, and then having Harper arrested.  Harper filed a complaint, and when the video was discovered, Kane was suspended, the case was referred to the District Attorney for investigation, and the drug charges against Harper were dismissed.  It is unknown how many other people might have been framed over the years by NRPD officers who were not caught on tape.

In 2020, after the police killings of Kamal Flowers, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and many other Black people across the country, then New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ordered every local government in the state to create a reform plan to address issues of racism in the policing of Black communities.  After intense pressure from New Rochelle residents, the City Council agreed in 2021 to form a “Community-Police Partnership Board” (CPPB) and directed the CPPB to propose a structure for an independent Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) within a year.  More than two years later, the CPPB proposed a virtually powerless CCRB, which is now being considered by the City Council.  Most of the police members of the CPPB opposed the creation of any CCRB at all.

At the quarterly meeting of Citizens for a Better New Rochelle on September 25, Police Commissioner Robert Gazzola dismissed calls for enhanced training of New Rochelle police officers.  He said the suspension of Lieutenant  Kane would be “serious training for everyone else,” and that “just that alone is going to be enough.”  Gazzola also said that all the officers involved in the Garris killing had been thoroughly trained in de-escalation and mental health responses, that “there was probable cause to make an arrest–it was a lawful arrest,” and that Conn “did not escalate in my opinion, just looking at the video.”

NRPD Police Commissioner Robert Gazzola

Two Black men shot dead by NRPD officers in four years, a third Black man framed on drug charges by a senior NRPD officer, a department that openly resists any public accountability, and a commissioner who treats all this as business as usual.

What is going on in the NRPD?  Is this the kind of policing New Rochelle wants and deserves?  Who is setting standards for the NRPD and enforcing them?  The Police Commissioner?  The City Manager?  The City Council?  The Mayor?  Anyone?

New Rochelle needs a police department where officers are well trained and sensitive to the needs of the communities they serve, and where officers who are corrupt or violent are held accountable.

Make your voice heard!  Contact the mayor, your council member, and the acting City Manager.

Or show up at the City Council’s next monthly Citizens To Be Heard session:

Tuesday, October 8, at 7 pm

City Hall, 515 North Avenue

(Anyone can sign up to speak to the Council and the community for 3 minutes.)

Crisis at the New Rochelle Police Department originally ran Monday, October 7th on New RoAR News