Home Blog Page 45

Environmental Leaders of Color (ELOC) Honored with City Proclamation for Five Years of Climate and Technology Leadership

Mount Vernon, NY – September 23, 2025

The Mount Vernon City Council has officially recognized Environmental Leaders of Color (ELOC) with a city proclamation, celebrating the organization’s five years of transformative work in climate education, technology, and youth leadership.

The proclamation, presented during a ceremony at Mount Vernon City Hall, was read by City Councilman Edward Poteat and awarded to Dr. Diana K. Williams, founder and executive director of ELOC, and Marvin V. Church, co-founder and longtime champion of the organization’s mission.

Building Youth Leadership in Climate and Technology

Since its founding in 2020, ELOC has empowered more than 600 students in grades 9–12 through programs designed to connect environmental awareness with technology and career readiness. Its signature initiatives include:

  • Don’t Strain Your Drain – A community campaign collecting used cooking oil while raising awareness about water pollution.
  • Summer Energy & Environmental Program for Teens – A summer intensive on climate literacy, renewable energy, and environmental careers.
  • Advanced Computer Science Program – A forward-looking initiative preparing students for college and careers in AI, coding, and STEM fields tied to climate resilience.

Inspiring Voices and Mentorship

Over the past five years, ELOC’s summer program has featured high-profile guest speakers who brought real-world expertise to students. Highlights include:

  • Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd, professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Georgia and host of Weather Geeks on The Weather Channel.
  • Bruce Jackson, retired Associate General Counsel at Microsoft and nationally recognized author on equity and opportunity in tech.
  • Anton Vincent, President of Mars Wrigley North America, who shared his journey as a Black executive shaping sustainability in the global food industry.
  • Heather Corbett, former ABC Nightline correspondent, who discussed the power of environmental storytelling and journalism.

New AI Safeguards Course This Fall

Looking ahead, ELOC is launching a new AI Safeguards course this fall at the Westchester Community College Annex in Mount Vernon. The free Saturday morning program will explore the ethical implications and practical applications of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language models, giving students early exposure to technologies that are reshaping the future. Spaces remain open for enrollment.

A Mission of Equity and Innovation

Dr. Williams emphasized that ELOC’s mission is rooted in equity, empowerment, and innovation—creating pathways for youth of color to become leaders in science, sustainability, and civic change.

“ELOC is proof that when we invest in our young people, especially in communities of color, we build a future that is not only environmentally resilient but also socially just,” said Williams.

For more information about ELOC’s programs or to support its mission, visit www.eloc.earth.

The Politics of the Shutdown: Responsibility vs. Dependency

0

When entitlements expand beyond the needy, taxpayers foot the bill for those who can work but won’t.

Every time Washington faces a budget deadline, we’re treated to the same melodrama: warnings of catastrophe, sob stories paraded before the cameras, and politicians pretending to fight for “the people.” This year, the script hasn’t changed. Democrats claim a government shutdown would devastate health care. But let’s be clear about what they’re really fighting for. Children aren’t losing Medicaid. Seniors aren’t losing Medicaid. The disabled aren’t losing Medicaid. The law already protects them. The fight is over whether able-bodied adults under 55 — those who can work — should continue to receive taxpayer-funded health care without conditions.

The emotional headlines say Democrats are defending “health care access.” In plain English, they’re defending two things: keeping enhanced subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and blocking work requirements for able-bodied adults on Medicaid. Neither of these has anything to do with the most vulnerable. The political class is holding the budget hostage to protect subsidies for the able-bodied and the bureaucracies that manage them.

Republicans have drawn a line: Medicaid should remain a safety net, not a hammock. Work requirements are not cruelty — they’re common sense. Other assistance programs have long required able-bodied recipients to work or train. Why should Medicaid be different? Critics point to the risk of people losing coverage over paperwork. If true, that is an indictment of bureaucratic incompetence, not an argument against having standards. To say “because some people will fall through the cracks, we must eliminate rules altogether” is not logic — it’s political theater.

Medicaid is often talked about in Washington as if it were a national program, but the reality is that it is a state-run system funded in partnership with the federal government. The federal government sets minimum rules and provides matching dollars, yet each state decides who qualifies, what services are covered, and how the program operates. That is why benefits differ so widely from New York to Texas to Mississippi. When Congress debates Medicaid, it is really debating the conditions attached to federal money. If Washington changes the rules, states must either comply or lose billions in funding. The daily reality of Medicaid — who gets care, how easy it is to access, and what services are included — is determined not in the Capitol, but in fifty separate state capitals. And as Sowell would remind us, the problem is not that politicians don’t know this — it’s that they hope you don’t.

As Thomas Sowell warned for decades, there are no solutions, only trade-offs. Every dollar spent on able-bodied adults is a dollar not directed toward children, seniors, or the disabled. Worse, it entrenches a culture of dependency where public aid becomes permanent, not temporary. Democrats also want to stop states from setting their own work requirements. That means Washington politicians, not local governments, will dictate how Medicaid operates in every community. That’s not compassion; it’s central planning. It undermines federalism and punishes states that want to encourage independence over dependency.

This shutdown drama is not about health care for the needy. It’s about whether able-bodied adults under 55 should be able to remain on Medicaid without conditions. Democrats say yes. Republicans say no. Strip away the noise, and the choice is simple: Should Medicaid remain a lifeline for the helpless, or an indefinite entitlement for those who can and should take responsibility for their own lives? That’s the debate — not the scare stories, not the political spin. And it’s a debate long overdue.

After Adams: Black New Yorkers at a Political Crossroads

Eric Adams’s time as mayor was plagued with scandal — some of it his own doing, some of it the result of a Democratic Party that never fully wanted him in office. From federal investigations into campaign fundraising to mismanagement of the migrant crisis, Adams became a lightning rod. But here’s the deeper truth: when Adams stumbled, his party abandoned him. The same Democratic establishment that has closed ranks around others in crisis left a Black mayor to twist in the wind. For many in our community, that felt familiar.

Now, with Adams officially out of the race, Black New Yorkers find ourselves at a crossroads. The ballot offers two starkly different choices: Andrew Cuomo, weighed down by his own baggage but seasoned in governance, and Zohran Mamdani, a progressive darling whose platform excites activists but fails to address the bread-and-butter concerns of working-class Black families. This moment matters, because the stakes for Black New Yorkers could not be higher.

Read:Eric Adams Exits, Cuomo vs. Mamdani: The Battle for New York’s Future

Walk through East New York, Harlem, the South Bronx, or Southeast Queens, and you’ll hear the same concerns repeated: safer streets so children can play outside, schools that prepare our kids for college and careers, affordable homeownership instead of lifetime renting, stable jobs that allow families to build wealth, and lower taxes so working people can afford to stay in the city they built. These are not luxuries — they are survival issues. And yet, they are not the center of Mamdani’s platform. Instead, we hear about rent cancellation, debt forgiveness, and sweeping subsidies. These policies may sound bold, but they do little to move poor Black families from dependency to independence.

Free rent doesn’t create ownership. Debt cancellation doesn’t help the brother or sister who never got the chance to go to college. Universal subsidies may sound compassionate, but they leave us dependent on government lifelines instead of building the generational wealth our community has been denied for too long. As a small business owner, I can say plainly: a $30 an hour minimum wage will not liberate our people — it will put them out of work. Small businesses are the backbone of this city’s economy and one of the main paths for Black entrepreneurship. We are already struggling under high rents, inflation, and crushing taxes. Adding a mandate that doubles labor costs is a recipe for layoffs, closures, and fewer opportunities in neighborhoods that can least afford to lose them.

Black New Yorkers don’t need more slogans about survival wages. We need policies that actually grow wages by creating more jobs. We need targeted investments that help our children get trained for careers, not just service work. We need access to ownership opportunities — including mortgages, co-ops, and small business loans — that help us transition from dependency to independence.

Adams’s fall also teaches us something bigger: the margin for error is razor-thin when you are a Black leader in power. Every misstep becomes magnified, every controversy weaponized. Meanwhile, white or establishment-aligned politicians often get second, third, and fourth chances. This isn’t about excusing Adams’s mistakes. It’s about recognizing the political reality: a Black mayor who didn’t fit neatly into the party’s box was never going to be given the room to succeed. That should trouble us, because it means our leaders are disposable unless they conform to the political norms.

So where does that leave Black New Yorkers in this election? With no clear champion. Cuomo, for all his flaws, knows how to govern and can speak the language of economic development. Mamdani offers slogans that resonate with downtown activists but not with mothers in Brownsville worried about rent, or fathers in Queens concerned about crime. Black voters should not be reduced to a swing bloc, trotted out at the last minute with the tired warning, “If you don’t vote for this candidate, the other one will win.” Our issues are not afterthoughts — they are central to whether this city thrives or falls apart.

This election must be about more than ideology. It must be about outcomes. Black New Yorkers cannot afford another four years of leadership that talks past us. We must demand concrete commitments: real investment in our schools, a plan for affordable mortgages and homeownership, public safety strategies that protect without profiling, and tax relief that allows families to stay rooted in their communities. Without that, we are not partners in the city’s future — we are pawns in someone else’s political game. The message is simple: don’t just ask for our vote. Show us your plan for our block, our school, our shelter, and our future.

STSI’s Westchester Black Maternal & Child Center of Excellence Celebrates TeamBirth Launch at St. John’s Riverside Hospital in Yonkers

0

Community Leaders, Healthcare Professionals, and Advocates Unite to Advance Safe, Equitable, and Respectful Maternal Care

Dr. Cheryl Brannan, founder of Sister to Sister International (STSI) and the Westchester Black Maternal
Child Center for Excellence (WBMCCE) participated in the press conference at St. John’s Riverside Hospital, announcing the launch of the TeamBirth initiative.

“This milestone marks a significant step toward advancing equitable, respectful, and patient-centered maternal care in Westchester County. TeamBirth is more than a model—it’s a commitment to listening to mothers, dismantling systemic inequities, and ensuring dignity and compassion are at the heart of every birthing experience. TeamBirth is the answer, and we have been pleased to collaborate with St. John’s Riverside Hospital as a community partner over the past three years,” Dr. Brannan shared.

The Westchester Black Maternal and Child Center of Excellence (WBMCCE) is a STSI offering dedicated to improving Black maternal and child health outcomes through advocacy, research, education, and culturally tailored care models. The WBMCCE works to eliminate racial disparities in maternal health by building partnerships, engaging communities, and promoting systemic change.

TeamBirth, developed by Ariadne Labs, is an innovative, evidence-based care model that transforms the
birthing experience by centering open communication, shared decision-making, and mutual respect between birthing individuals, their support networks, and clinical care teams. Its proven approach directly addresses disparities in maternal health outcomes, especially those impacting Black and Brown women at disproportionately high rates.

In attendance for the announcement were Ken W. Jenkins, Westchester County Executive, New York State
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins; Legislator Jewel Williams; Legislator Shanae Williams; Dr. Suzanne Greenidge (SJRH and owner of Woman to Woman OB/GYN–Yonkers); Abigail Slattery, Clinical Implementation Specialist for TeamBirth; Sister to Sister International WBMCCE Consultants Cheryl Hunter-Grant and Beryl Weaver; and a host of community partners, hospital leadership, and staff—each standing in solidarity to create safer, more equitable birthing experiences.

CE Jenkins notably shared that Westchester County allocated monetary support to the TeamBirth program, underscoring the County’s commitment to addressing disparities and improving maternal and infant health outcomes. He also emphasized the historic nature of the occasion, as St. John’s Riverside Hospital is the first hospital in Westchester County to implement TeamBirth’s groundbreaking program.

“With all that is currently going on in our country, the launch of TeamBirth is more important than ever
for people of color,” said Legislator Jewel Williams.

“This is about equity, empowerment, and ensuring that communities that have been most marginalized in maternal health have access to the best possible care.”

Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins reflected on her own motherhood experience, saying, “My greatest title is mother.” She thanked Ron Corti, President and CEO of St. John’s Riverside Hospital, noting that “when the conversation about infant mortality began, he was front and center.” She praised the team-based approach of TeamBirth, adding, “When critical decisions are to be made, the team comes together—it makes so much sense.”

Stewart-Cousins reaffirmed that “The State is here to create healthier outcomes” and shared the funding structure of the Baby to Baby initiative, emphasizing the importance of supporting families at every
stage.

“TeamBirth’s guiding principles perfectly align with our vision for maternal care that is safe, equitable,
and respectful,” said Suzanne Greenidge, MD. “This approach ensures that the voices of mothers are heard and valued, while the care team works in true partnership with families.”

As a trusted community partner, the WBMCCE will play an active role in supporting TeamBirth’s success at St. John’s Riverside Hospital by providing culturally responsive expertise, fostering community engagement, and ensuring the program reflects the voices and needs of local families.

In closing remarks, Dr. Brannan said, “St. John’s Riverside Hospital is community strong, STSI is on the
MOVE, Team Birth is a Game Changer, and Westchester is “Bestchester.” We are Better Together, and
patients at SJRH will reap the benefits!

Grand Blanc Church Attack: One Dead, Ten Injured in Sunday Morning Shooting and Fire

Grand Blanc, MI — Tragedy struck the community of Grand Blanc on Sunday morning when a 40-year-old man from Burton drove his vehicle through the front doors of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and opened fire during an active worship service.

The attack began around 10:25 a.m., with hundreds of congregants inside the church. According to Grand Blanc Township Police Chief William Renie, the suspect exited his vehicle and began firing rounds at worshippers, striking 10 people. At least one victim has died, and several others remain in critical condition at area hospitals.

“Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims of this incident, which is completely unnecessary and avoidable,” Renie said during a press briefing.

Two law enforcement officers — one from the Department of Natural Resources and one from Grand Blanc Township Police — engaged the suspect and fatally shot him, preventing further casualties.

Fire and Structural Collapse

As chaos unfolded, a fire broke out inside the church, which investigators believe was deliberately set by the suspect. The blaze was strong enough to cause part of the structure to collapse before being extinguished by Grand Blanc Township firefighters. Authorities fear additional victims may still be discovered in the burned section once it is safe to re-enter.

Chief Renie confirmed the FBI has assigned over 100 agents to assist with the investigation, including interviews with dozens of witnesses who were inside the church at the time. The ATF is also investigating the suspected arson.

Community and Leadership Response

Township Supervisor Scott Bennett called the event “heartbreaking” for a community unaccustomed to this kind of violence.

“This kind of violence doesn’t happen in our community, and we are heartbroken that it came to Grand Blanc Township,” Bennett said. “We will do everything we can to support the families, the victims, and our community as we get through this tragedy.”

Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued a statement calling the attack “unacceptable,” while pledging state resources to assist local authorities.

Next Steps

Authorities are executing search warrants at the suspect’s residence and reviewing his phone records to determine a motive. As of now, police believe he acted alone and that there is no further threat to the public.

Families seeking information about loved ones have been directed to contact the Grand Blanc Township Police Department at 810-424-2611.

Chief Renie emphasized that more updates would come as investigators secure the site and gather evidence. A second press conference is expected later in the evening.

Eric Adams Exits, Cuomo vs. Mamdani: The Battle for New York’s Future

1

Eric Adams is out. The second Black mayor of New York City has ended his re-election bid, a stunning but not surprising development after months of political scandals, investigations, and eroding public trust. For all the symbolism of Adams’ election, the reality is simple: symbolism without outcomes collapses under its own weight.

Now the mayoral race is set: Andrew Cuomo vs. Zohran Mamdani. This showdown says a lot about where New York—and Black America—stand politically.

Adams’ Fall: A Lesson in Leadership

Adams came into office promising safety, stability, and representation. He leaves with the city more divided, housing costs higher, and crime debates unresolved. For Black New Yorkers who saw his victory as a milestone, the disappointment runs deep. Once again, we are reminded that representation without results is empty. The community doesn’t need another photo op—we need policies that change lives.

Cuomo’s Comeback: Experience or Old Politics?

Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, has reemerged in the spotlight as an independent candidate. His pitch is simple: experience, toughness, and the ability to govern.

Pros: Cuomo knows the machinery of government. He can cut deals, push legislation, and keep the city running. Some moderates, unions, and business leaders see him as a “safe pair of hands” in uncertain times.

Cons: Cuomo carries heavy baggage—sexual harassment allegations, scandal over nursing home deaths during COVID, and the arrogance that led to his fall from Albany. His run as an independent could split the Democratic base, and younger, progressive voters see him as the face of everything broken in establishment politics.

And now, there are rumors swirling that Donald Trump, eager to sideline Cuomo, has floated offering him an ambassadorship to Saudi Arabia. Whether true or not, the story underscores how transactional politics has become. Is Cuomo running to serve the city, or to leverage his way into another power play?

Mamdani’s Moment: Bold Vision or Risky Gamble?

Zohran Mamdani, the young Assemblyman from Queens, represents the opposite pole. He’s a democratic socialist who beat Cuomo in the Democratic primary through ranked-choice voting, and he’s running on a platform of sweeping change.

Pros: Mamdani excites young people, tenants, and communities tired of half-measures. His vision—rent freezes, free buses, taxing the wealthy to expand social services—directly addresses the inequality crisis strangling New York. He offers fresh energy and a break from politics as usual.

Cons: Mamdani has never managed a city, let alone one as complex as New York. His proposals face big questions of feasibility and financing. Critics warn his agenda could drive out investment, burden taxpayers, or collapse under bureaucracy. His boldness is inspiring, but risky.

And let’s be clear: Black law enforcement leaders have already come out strongly against Mamdani’s policing policies, warning that his push to defund, weaken, or over-politicize police accountability will make Black and Brown communities less safe. The same neighborhoods crying out for protection from gun violence and repeat offenders may find themselves further abandoned under his agenda.

What’s Really at Stake

This isn’t just Cuomo vs. Mamdani. This is old politics vs. radical change—incrementalism vs. transformation. For Black and working-class New Yorkers, the stakes are immediate: affordable housing, safe streets, decent schools, and fair economic opportunity.

  • Cuomo offers experience, but with the same establishment that often ignored us.
  • Mamdani offers vision, but with the risk of policies that may not survive the realities of governance.

The choice is not easy. But one truth is clear: Black voters cannot afford to be surface people. We can’t get swept up in personalities or slogans. We must demand outcomes. Who will actually reduce the rent burden? Who will deliver safer communities without criminalizing us? Who will put resources into schools, small businesses, and health?

Eric Adams’ collapse proves that representation without accountability is a dead end. Now the race is between a comeback politician with scars and a newcomer with dreams. Neither deserves blind loyalty. Both must be pressed—relentlessly—on how they will deliver for the people who need it most.

New York doesn’t just need a new mayor. It needs leadership that measures success not in headlines, but in outcomes that transform lives.

Black Westchester will keep asking the questions the mainstream won’t. Because our future depends on it.

Kamala Harris’s 107 Days: Inside Her Anger at Biden, Frustration With Democrats, and the Risk She Wouldn’t Take

Kamala Harris’s new memoir, 107 Days, has landed like a political thunderclap. Published September 23, 2025, by Simon & Schuster, the book chronicles her short-lived presidential campaign against Donald Trump after Joe Biden’s withdrawal. But more than just a campaign diary, it reads as a reckoning—an unfiltered airing of grievances about Biden, his inner circle, and the broader Democratic Party.

Anger at Biden: “Recklessness” and Betrayal

Harris spares no words in describing her anger and disappointment with Joe Biden. She calls his decision to delay dropping out of the 2024 race an act of “recklessness,” arguing that it left her with too little time—just 107 days—to build a campaign that could compete with Trump.

She accuses Biden’s team of undercutting her directly by feeding or tolerating negative stories about her office being “chaotic” or suffering from staff turnover. In her telling, Biden’s aides adopted a zero-sum mentality: “If she’s shining, he’s dimmed.”

Harris even recounts a tense phone call before a major debate, where Biden accused her of bad-mouthing him to party powerbrokers. She describes the timing as “bewildering and destabilizing”—a needless confrontation at a critical moment.

On foreign policy, Harris condemns Biden’s lack of empathy for Palestinians during the Gaza war, contrasting it with his highly visible support for Ukraine. “It wasn’t just about foreign policy,” she writes. “It was about whether our values were real or rhetorical.”

Democratic Leadership: Loyalty Demanded, Support Withheld

Harris also takes aim at the wider Democratic establishment. She claims that party insiders treated her candidacy as “Biden’s leftovers” instead of rallying behind her as a serious contender.

She writes that Barack Obama withheld his full endorsement until too late, framing his support as more symbolic than strategic. She argues that Democratic leaders—including those in Congress—were more concerned with preserving their own standing than backing her with real political capital.

Harris singles out the overwhelming influence of pro-Israel voices within the party, saying they pressured her to soften her critiques of U.S. policy in Gaza. To her, this was another example of how Democrats demanded silence on issues of principle in exchange for party unity.

The Pete Buttigieg Decision

Perhaps the most headline-grabbing admission is her revelation that Pete Buttigieg was her first choice for vice president. She describes him as “an ideal partner,” but ultimately judged the ticket too risky:

“He would have been an ideal partner—if I were a straight white man.”

Harris reasoned that a ticket combining a Black woman and an openly gay man might be too much for voters to accept with only 107 days to campaign. She admits that part of her wanted to “just do it,” but she ultimately chose caution, describing the decision as one made with “mutual sadness.”

Her comments triggered backlash, prompting Harris to clarify in interviews that she did not reject Buttigieg because of his sexuality, but because of the high stakes and short timeline. Still, Buttigieg expressed surprise, saying the issue had never come up in their private conversations.

Missteps, Grief, and the Human Cost

Harris does not deny her own missteps. She points to her disastrous appearance on The View, where she said she “couldn’t think of anything” that separated her from Biden, as a turning point that weakened her candidacy.

She describes the loss as “traumatic,” comparing it to the grief she felt after her mother’s death. Her husband, Doug Emhoff, emerges as a quiet protector, shielding her from internal polling that showed the campaign collapsing.

Reception: Finger-Pointing or Truth-Telling?

Reaction to 107 Days has been sharply divided. Some praise Harris’s candor in exposing the dysfunction within Democratic leadership. Others accuse her of deflecting blame and deepening party fractures. Commentators like Stephen A. Smith dismissed the memoir entirely, sneering: “Who cares?”

But regardless of whether it rehabilitates her image or worsens perceptions, the book leaves no doubt: Harris believes her campaign was undermined as much by her own party as by Trump. In her eyes, Biden’s recklessness, party insiders’ disloyalty, and the crushing weight of political calculation combined to doom her historic candidacy.

INDONESIA PLEDGES 20K TROOPS TO GAZA TO DEFEND PALESTINIANS FROM NETANYAHU

United Nations, New York — In one of the most powerful speeches delivered at the UN General Assembly in recent memory, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto declared that his country is prepared to send 20,000 or more troopsto Gaza. The move, he said, would be part of a mission to secure peace and protect Palestinians from ongoing violence and oppression under Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

“If and when the United Nations Security Council and this great assembly decide, Indonesia is prepared to deploy 20,000 or even more of our sons and daughters to help secure peace in Gaza,” Prabowo told world leaders. His words drew vigorous applause, signaling Indonesia’s readiness to match its diplomatic stance with boots on the ground.

Prabowo grounded his pledge in Indonesia’s own history of colonialism, exploitation, and apartheid conditions under Dutch rule. “We Indonesians know what it means to be denied justice and what it means to live in poverty and apartheid,” he said. That struggle, he argued, ties Indonesia’s destiny to that of the Palestinians, who today face displacement, starvation, and relentless bombardment. The president reminded the Assembly that Indonesia’s independence was recognized and supported through the UN. Just as global solidarity lifted Indonesia out of oppression, he said, the world now has a moral duty to do the same for Palestine.

Indonesia is already one of the most significant contributors to UN peacekeeping forces, with thousands of its soldiers serving worldwide. However, Prabowo made it clear that this offer goes far beyond mere symbolic rhetoric. “We will continue to serve where peace needs guardians, not with just words, but with boots on the ground,” he said. In addition to manpower, Indonesia also pledged to provide financial support for peace operations, while announcing increased humanitarian aid, including rice shipments to feed starving Palestinians in Gaza.

While the headline-grabbing pledge focused on defending Palestinians, Prabowo also emphasized Indonesia’s commitment to a two-state solution and security guarantees for both peoples. “We must have an independent Palestine,” he declared, before adding: “But we must also guarantee the safety and security of Israel. Only then can we have real peace.” This balancing act highlights Indonesia’s approach: strong support for Palestinian rights, but within a framework that seeks reconciliation rather than endless war.

Indonesia is the world’s largest Muslim-majority nation, with a population of nearly 280 million. A troop commitment of this scale would mark one of the most significant international interventions in Gaza’s history — but only if the UN authorizes it. For Palestinians, the pledge represents a rare moment when a major nation has gone beyond empty statements and offered real, enforceable solidarity. For Netanyahu’s government, it signals growing global pressure and a potential shift in the international opinion balance.

Indonesia has drawn a clear line: if the UN acts, it will lead. By pledging 20,000 troops for Gaza, Jakarta is not only defending Palestinians but also challenging a world order where, as Prabowo put it, “the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.” Whether the UN Security Council follows through remains to be seen. But one thing is certain — the call for justice in Palestine is no longer just words.

Autism, The Politics of Health, and the Questions No One Wants to Answer

When Donald Trump warned against Tylenol use during pregnancy, critics called it reckless. When Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. followed with a sweeping statement about “turning over every stone” from pharmaceuticals to toxic exposures, the outrage doubled. The medical establishment quickly reassured the public that acetaminophen is safe. Yet Kennedy’s speech marked a turning point: for the first time in decades, the federal government admitted it is willing to study all potential causes of autism — including the ones once considered politically off-limits. “Historically, NIH has focused almost solely on politically safe and entirely fruitless research about the genetic drivers of autism,” Kennedy said. “That would be like studying the genetic drivers of lung cancer without looking at cigarettes.” The FDA has now announced it will place warning labels on acetaminophen for pregnant women, advise the lowest-dose use, and fund further research into possible links with autism and ADHD. Kennedy also pointed to folate deficiency and potential therapies, such as leucovorin, as areas of promise. And, most controversial, he stated that vaccines — long considered untouchable — are now under examination.


What’s missing from the headlines is the question that both Trump and Kennedy dared to ask: Why is autism so much more prevalent today than it was in the past? The familiar answer — that we are just “better at diagnosing” — does not hold up under scrutiny. In the 1970s, autism was considered rare. Today, it affects 1 in 36 children nationwide. Awareness alone cannot account for such a dramatic increase. And the rise is not distributed evenly. According to CDC surveillance data, Black children are now diagnosed at rates as high or higher than White children — about 1 in 27 Black 8-year-olds. That’s a reversal from decades ago, when Black children were systematically underdiagnosed.

Another disparity emerges: Black children with autism are more likely to also have intellectual disability compared to their White peers. This means many cases are only recognized when symptoms are severe, leaving milder forms undetected for years. Delayed diagnoses translate into delayed interventions, compounding challenges for families. So even as the statistics “catch up,” the outcomes do not. In Sowell’s language, this is a failure of results over rhetoric — one more example where institutions congratulate themselves on equity while families face harsher realities.


What medical experts avoid addressing is the possibility that autism’s rise is not driven by a single cause but by a combination of factors. The vaccine debate has long been declared “settled,” and now acetaminophen is brushed off as “unproven.” But what if the truth is not either/or, but both/and? What if autism stems from an interplay of vaccines, common pharmaceuticals like Tylenol, environmental toxins, and nutritional deficiencies? To dismiss that possibility outright is not science but politics. The health care system must shift its focus from protecting narratives to examining outcomes. The outcome is clear: autism diagnoses are dramatically higher than in the 1970s, and Black children face disproportionate rates with more severe complications. Numbers don’t lie — and until those numbers are confronted, the establishment has no excuse for refusing to ask the hard questions.


Instead of engaging Kennedy’s announcement on its merits, the political class resorted to outrage. Critics labeled it pseudoscience. Yet the new approach — breaking down silos between NIH, FDA, CDC, and CMS — is precisely what many families have demanded for decades: research without taboos. Even if Kennedy is incorrect about some exposures, his broader point remains valid. For too long, research has been confined to politically safe areas, overlooking environmental and pharmaceutical opportunities.


Meanwhile, the numbers kept climbing. Families — especially in Black communities with fewer resources and later diagnoses — deserve answers, not dismissals. Sowell often reminded us: “When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.” The truth is, autism is more prevalent today than in any previous generation. The truth is Black Americans are disproportionately affected by late detection and higher severity. And the truth is, our institutions have failed to produce answers while hiding behind politically convenient science.


No one is suggesting parents abandon medicine overnight. But the refusal to ask hard questions has left families in the dark. If Kennedy’s initiative finally forces a complete, unbiased examination of all causes — genetic, pharmaceutical, environmental, and beyond — it will do more for children than decades of bureaucratic reassurance. Autism is a complex disorder, but complexity is no excuse for inaction. Until our institutions deliver honest answers, the rise in prevalence — especially among Black children — will remain a national crisis hiding in plain sight.

Woman’s Body Found in Abandoned Mount Vernon House Under Investigation

Mount Vernon, NY — Authorities are investigating after a woman’s body was discovered inside an abandoned house on Beekman Avenue in Mount Vernon.

Police say the call came in shortly after midday when a worker inspecting the foreclosed property made the discovery. Responding officers secured the scene, and biohazard crews were brought in due to the condition of the remains.

The body was removed and taken to the Westchester County Medical Examiner’s Office, where officials will determine the woman’s identity and the cause of death. At this time, investigators say they do not believe foul play is involved, though the case remains under investigation.

The Mount Vernon Police Department is asking anyone with information to come forward. Tips can be submitted anonymously by texting “MVPD” and your message to 847411, or by calling the Detective Division directly at 914-665-2510.

Black Westchester will provide updates as more information becomes available.