Are All Muslims Members of HAMAS? George Latimer Refuses to Answer!

Date:

In a recent Facebook post, the organization, the Westchester Black Political Conference (WBPC), challenged County Executive George Latimer to address a New York Times exposé on Israeli demolitions of Palestinian buildings. The article described how Israel destroyed hundreds of buildings that could prevent residents from returning home in violation of humanitarian law. 

Given the Times’ reporting and Latimer’s ties to pro-Israel donors,The organization named him “Genocide George” for refusing to address his foreign policy’s human impact. Latimer called the post a “vicious and unfair attack.” I wondered why questioning the loss of Palestinian life is an attack while his social media ignores the pain of the Palestinian people, including those here in Westchester, specifically the Palestinian people who live in CD16. 

Latimer: I support the release of kidnapped hostages and Hamas renouncing violence to murder Jews. What do you support?

WBPC: “the organization denounces all terrorism but asked him to also denounce Israel’s “acts of genocide” cited in International Court of Justice.” 

WBPC: Do you believe that all Muslims are members of HAMAS?

WBPC: Do you think it’s fair to bomb Christian churches, mosques, and hospitals and desecrate cemeteries?

Latimer accused me, Damon K. Jones, of launching an attack without listening. I’m not entirely sure how my name got involved in this, but it seems convenient to assign blame. Perhaps because I’m known as one of the outspoken individuals in Westchester, it’s easy to point fingers in my direction. 

In all honesty, I am a proud member of WBPC. Why shouldn’t I be? I’m Black. But isn’t it only natural that we should prioritize our community above party affiliations? 

Even Latimer’s supporters endorse this concept of prioritizing community over party; it’s prominently featured on their website. They even encourage Republicans to switch to the Democratic Party to defeat Jamaal Bowman. So, why is it seen as an attack when a Black man echoes this very same belief? The fact of the matter is that this is another way for George Latimer’s Republican supporters to suppress the Black and Brown vote in DCD16. The persistence of double standards is a question we must address, and George Latimer and his campaign must be accountable. 

While running as a candidate to represent the entire district of CD16, George Latimer’s dismissal of valid questions about his political stance is undemocratic. 

This is particularly concerning given his connections to pro-Israel Republican MAGA donors. These questions are straightforward: Where is his compassion in light of allegations involving:

  • The deaths of Palestinian civilians, 
  • The demolition of 36 hospitals, 
  • The displacement of 2 million people, 
  • The destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure, 
  • Acts of violence and oppression in the West Bank,
  •  And the incitement of settler attacks that have resulted in numerous deaths? 

These incidents have all been reported by reputable news sources and outlets and denounced by the International Court of Justice (ICJ)

One of the straightforward questions he could have addressed was acknowledging that not all Muslims are members of HAMAS. However, he chose not to respond or acknowledge this question. 

Unfortunately, George Latimer avoided addressing the question on social media. He stated that he would not respond to a straightforward query question of whether he believes all Muslims are part of HAMAS. This behavior resembles traditional political “Ali Shuffle” tactics, possibly influenced by his status as a top recipient of AIPAC donations amounting to $353,000.

Some argue that such significant contributions may indicate a lack of concern for the well-being of people of color and a belief that all Muslims are associated with HAMAS. The question raised here is whether these actions align with the actual values of the Democratic Party in Westchester. It’s disheartening to see how far the party may have fallen in the eyes of some observers.

It is disappointing that George had a clear opportunity to correct misconceptions but failed to acknowledge the positive contributions of Muslims to our communities. Muslims serve as police officers, county correction officers, firefighters, doctors, EMS workers, and law-abiding citizens in CD16. George has refused to acknowledge their positive impact and has not shown them the humanity of recognizing that not all Muslims are associated with HAMAS.

As a newspaper publisher who has frequently supported you, George Latimer, during your time as County Executive, we are responsible for seeking genuine answers without allowing you to dismiss this as an unjust attack. With 40 percent of your funding coming from Republican MAGA pro-Israel organizations, it becomes evident that you may not be able to represent the entire district fairly.

DAMON K JONES
DAMON K JONEShttps://damonkjones.com
A multifaceted personality, Damon is an activist, author, and the force behind Black Westchester Magazine, a notable Black-owned newspaper based in Westchester County, New York. With a wide array of expertise, he wears many hats, including that of a Spiritual Life Coach, Couples and Family Therapy Coach, and Holistic Health Practitioner. He is well-versed in Mental Health First Aid, Dietary and Nutritional Counseling, and has significant insights as a Vegan and Vegetarian Nutrition Life Coach. Not just limited to the world of holistic health and activism, Damon brings with him a rich 32-year experience as a Law Enforcement Practitioner and stands as the New York Representative of Blacks in Law Enforcement of America.

4 COMMENTS

  1. I’m so disappointed George has no compassion for suffering. As a fellow Catholic I thought he would do some reflection on the slaughter happening in Gaza. I wrote this to him privately after he blocked me for challenging his position of unconditional support for Netanayhu and the Israeli actions in Gaza:

    George it’s been hard to watch thousands of children murdered senselessly while you continue to support this killing unconditionally even as it makes Israel and us all less safe. You’re actually in a position to do something about this- to tell the people giving you money to support Netanyahu unconditionally that the path he and Israel have been on is just pure self-defeating madness. I think I’ve recommended you read Hannah Arendt’s “On Violence” – Violence and power are in fact opposites. A true solution will only come about once the violence ends. I had hoped you would be a moral leader who might help stop this madness instead of enabling it to continue as our representatives have done for too many years. If you truly care about people, about Israel, about our security, you would reflect on what is happening there instead of unconditionally supporting a failed policy and a failed government. Until people like you do, more children will die. Doing something about that is what motivates me and others. You underestimate people’s upset about this at your own electoral peril.

  2. Bravo Damon and the WBPC for challenging George Latimer’s acceptance of AIPAC and Trump supporters’ money and support for Republicans entering and taking control of the direction of the Democratic Party.

  3. First, this article is very poorly written, like an essay by a high-school student. Secondly, “do you believe all Muslims are members of Hamas” is a rhetorical question, asked in order to bait Latimer. I would refuse to answer it seriously, too. “Genocide George”? Is Latimer an Israeli policy maker? No. So he has committed no acts of genocide — this is a cheap attack on his character. And by the way, the ICJ has NOT come to any conclusion in the case, has NOT at this point found Israel guilty of genocide. You owe your readers better reporting.

    • Thank you for your comment. Regrettably, your criticism of the article seems like an attempt to distract from the main issue. As someone who knows Muslims in Westchester actively contributing to our communities and are registered Democrats, I understand the importance of elected officials addressing concerns from constituents. However, it appears George has failed to do so, possibly due to accepting funding from the racist MAGA AIPAC. Consequently, many in our community feel he should be held accountable until he speaks out against the Gaza atrocities and calls for a ceasefire to protect innocent civilians, regardless of their affiliations. Until he does so, he will be known as Genocide George.

      It’s important to ensure accuracy in our discussions. Regarding the situation in Gaza, the United Nations’ top court has indeed issued an order directing Israel to take measures to prevent loss of life, destruction, and potential acts of genocide in the region. However, it’s worth noting that the court did not specifically mandate an immediate end to the military offensive causing devastation in the Palestinian enclave. Here’s a link from the Associated Press for further reference.

      https://apnews.com/article/israel-gaza-genocide-court-south-africa-27cf84e16082cde798395a95e9143c06

      Again, thank you for your input, and I wish you a great day.

Comments are closed.

Share post:

BW ADS

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Black 2 Business

Latest Posts

More like this
Related

Money vs. Power: The Lesson Media Companies Should Learn From The Breakfast Club’s Netflix Deal

A line from the political drama House of Cards captures a truth that applies far beyond politics. The character Frank Underwood once said: “Money is the McMansion in Sarasota that starts falling apart after 10 years. Power is the old stone building that has stood for centuries.” That quote perfectly explains the debate surrounding the recent distribution changes involving The Breakfast Club and its move into a deal connected to Netflix through its parent distribution network. At first glance, deals like this appear attractive. Large platforms offer guaranteed revenue, global distribution, and the prestige of being connected to one of the world's largest...

The Death of Black Owned Media: The Last Piece of Black Ownership at BET Is Gone

The recent buyout of Tyler Perry’s ownership stake in BET+ marks more than a corporate restructuring. It signals the end of the last remaining piece of Black ownership connected to the BET ecosystem. With Paramount Global purchasing Perry’s stake, the streaming service is now fully controlled by the same corporation that already owns Black Entertainment Television. BET+ is expected to be folded into Paramount+ as part of the company’s broader strategy to consolidate its streaming platforms. For many viewers, this may look like a routine business decision. Large media companies restructure assets all the time. But the symbolism of this particular transaction is difficult to ignore. Tyler Perry’s investment in BET+ represented the final direct ownership link between Black capital and the BET brand. While BET itself had long been part of a corporate media structure, Perry’s stake in the streaming platform meant that a major Black creator still held equity in a piece of the distribution system tied to the network. That is no longer the case. With the buyout complete, the entire BET ecosystem now sits fully inside Paramount Global’s corporate portfolio. What once stood as a Black-owned media institution has become another brand within a multinational entertainment conglomerate. This distinction matters because ownership and representation are not the same thing. Black culture remains one of the most powerful forces in global entertainment. Black actors, writers, directors, musicians, and producers continue to shape popular culture at every level. But influence does not equal ownership. Ownership determines who controls the platform. Ownership determines who captures the long-term economic value created by media. Ownership determines who ultimately decides what content is produced and how it reaches audiences. This does not mean Black creators will disappear from television or streaming platforms. Black culture will continue to drive audiences, shape trends, and influence global entertainment. The real question is not whether Black content will exist. The real question is what kind of Black content will be produced — and who will decide what stories are told. Who will control how our history is portrayed?Who will shape the narratives about our communities?And what will our children be taught about our culture through the media they consume? Major studios and networks understand the economic value of Black cultural influence. But when ownership of the platforms sits entirely outside the community, the power to define the message no longer belongs to the culture that created it. For decades, BET symbolized something larger than entertainment. It represented the possibility that Black entrepreneurs could build and control a national media platform. Even after the network itself became part of a corporate structure, Tyler Perry’s stake in BET+ maintained at least some connection between Black ownership and the distribution of Black-focused content. That connection is now gone. Major Media Platforms Owned by Paramount Paramount Global owns one of the largest entertainment portfolios in the world. Its holdings include broadcast networks, cable channels, streaming services, movie studios, and global distribution arms.  Broadcast Networks CBS CBS News CBS Sports CBS Television Stations Streaming Platforms Paramount+ Pluto TV CBS News 24/7 CBS Sports HQ Cable Networks Paramount Media Networks controls a large group of cable brands including:  BET BET Her MTV VH1 Nickelodeon Nick Jr. Comedy Central Paramount Network TV Land Logo CMT Pop TV Smithsonian Channel Showtime The Movie Channel Flix Film and Studio Businesses Paramount...

Security Questions Emerge After Police Kill Man Linked to Rep. Jasmine Crockett

A deadly police shooting in Dallas has raised new questions after authorities confirmed the man killed had previously worked security at events connected to U.S. Representative Jasmine Crockett. The man, identified in reports as Mike King, was shot and killed by Dallas Police Department officers following a tense standoff earlier this week. While police say the shooting occurred after the suspect pointed a gun at officers, the revelation that he had previously worked security connected to a member of Congress has triggered scrutiny over vetting and security practices. What Happened According to police, officers were attempting to arrest King on a warrant related to impersonating a law enforcement officer. Authorities tracked him to a parking garage near Children’s Health Hospital in Dallas, where he barricaded himself inside a vehicle. A SWAT response team was called to the scene. After negotiations failed, officers deployed tear gas to force him out of the vehicle. Police say that when King exited the car, he emerged holding a firearm and pointed it toward officers. Officers opened fire.King was pronounced dead at the scene. No officers were injured during the incident. A Security Contractor With Political Connections Investigators later confirmed that King had previously provided security services at events involving Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a first-term Democratic congresswoman representing parts of Dallas and surrounding areas. Reports indicate King operated a company that connected off-duty police officers with private security jobs, including political events. Campaign finance records and public documentation reportedly show payments for security services linked to Crockett’s events within the past year. There is currently no indication that Crockett or her office were aware of any criminal investigation involving King prior to the incident. Her office has not issued a formal statement about the situation as of this writing. Allegations of Police Impersonation The warrant that led police to King was connected to allegations that he had been impersonating a law enforcement officer. Investigators say he was suspected of using: A replica undercover police-style vehicle Stolen or altered license plates Multiple aliases Authorities are still investigating the full scope of those allegations. Questions About Security Vetting The incident has raised broader questions about how private security contractors are vetted for political events, particularly for elected officials who frequently rely on private firms rather than government protective services. Members of Congress typically do not receive full-time federal protection unless they hold leadership roles or face specific threats. As a result, many campaigns and offices hire private security contractors for events. The Dallas shooting has now sparked debate over whether additional background checks or licensing requirementsshould be implemented for individuals providing security for elected officials. The Larger Debate For critics, the situation highlights what they see as a growing problem with the loosely regulated private security industry. Others argue the focus should remain on the circumstances of the police encounter itself, noting that officers say the shooting occurred only after the suspect pointed a weapon at law enforcement during an active standoff. The investigation into the incident is ongoing. What is clear is that the case now sits at the intersection of law enforcement, political security, and public accountability—a combination that almost guarantees continued scrutiny in the days ahead.

Badge & Barrier Breakers: The Black Women Who Paved the Way in Westchester Law Enforcement.

Black women have played a vital role in shaping...