Home Blog Page 89

Rhetoric Over Results: What AOC’s $9.6 Million Fundraising Says About Modern Politics”

In what world does a sitting Congresswoman raise $9.6 million in just three months — while her district remains one of the poorest in America?

Apparently, this one.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez didn’t raise this money because of her record. She raised it because in today’s political marketplace, rhetoric is more valuable than results. Emotion has replaced evidence, and public performance is more rewarded than public service.

To put her haul in perspective: AOC outraised every other Democrat in the House, including party leaders like Hakeem Jeffries and even figures with national profiles running competitive races. She brought in more than double what she raised during her prior record-setting quarter — not through a legislative victory, but through a national tour of political theater.

And what happens to the $9.6 million she raised? It won’t be used to clean up the streets of the Bronx or invest in Black-owned businesses. Legally, AOC can use those funds to travel the country — attending political conferences, giving speeches, hosting rallies — as long as it’s framed as campaign or political activity. And here’s the catch: even if she’s no longer in office, she can still use the money, as long as she remains politically active. In essence, the campaign account becomes a personal marketing piggy bank — funding her image, her influence, and her agenda, while the people who donated in hopes of change are left with empty slogans and worsening conditions. The working class gets speeches. She gets a platform — and the luxury of never having to deliver results.

There’s also the glaring hypocrisy that no one wants to talk about: AOC built her brand by attacking oligarchs, millionaires, and political elites — yet she’s becoming exactly what she claims to fight. She rails against wealth inequality while raising millions, enjoys elite media access, rubs shoulders with celebrities, and now commands the kind of influence that ordinary working people will never touch. It’s easy to demonize the rich until you become one of them — and even easier to justify it when your wealth is cloaked in moral crusades. But let’s be honest: the anti-oligarchy message rings hollow when it’s made by someone cashing in on the very system they pretend to dismantle.

Yet, in all this fundraising success, she has laid out no legislative agenda to solve the crisis in her district — and certainly none to address the greater problems facing the working class in America.

This is the heart of the problem: AOC has become the poster child for a new political hustle. One where outrage is monetized, but real-world outcomes are ignored. She’s not alone. The intellectual political class — pundits, influencers, activists, and elected officials — have figured out how to turn protest into paychecks, and hashtags into headlines. But what they haven’t figured out is how to lower crime, grow jobs, or build ownership in the communities they claim to fight for.

Let’s talk about safety.

Just days ago, a young Black boy named Sincere Jazmin was shot and killed in Queens while getting off a school bus. He was just 12 years old.


There was no press conference from AOC, no emotional plea for justice, no community response.
She stayed silent.

Why? Because violence in our neighborhoods doesn’t trend. Grieving Black mothers don’t fund national campaigns. Marching for safety in the Bronx doesn’t excite the donor class like fighting corporate greed does. And standing in the blood-stained shoes of working-class families doesn’t raise millions.

Meanwhile, in her own backyard:

  • Black unemployment is nearly double the national average.
  • Youth violence and gun crime are on the rise.
  • Local small businesses are closing while luxury development swallows the Bronx.
  • And the only thing growing is AOC’s celebrity status — and her campaign bank account.

What exactly has she delivered?

What legislation has she passed or sponsored that changed material conditions for working families?
What real economic engine has she proposed — not for Wall Street, but for Westchester Avenue?

Silence.

This is exactly what Thomas Sowell warned us about: the rise of the “anointed class” — self-proclaimed saviors with all the answers except the ones that work. They offer poetry instead of policy. They are performers, not producers.

And while they command stages, Black and Brown families continue to bury their children.
No jobs. No peace. No plan.

The Democratic Party, with AOC as one of its loudest voices, has no strategy to rebuild the Black working class. There is no push for land ownership. No investment in vocational trades. No agenda to scale Black business infrastructure or rebuild the family unit — just recycled slogans and a new DEI committee.

It’s not enough to sound passionate.
It’s not enough to be popular.
Caring is not a substitute for competence. And silence is not leadership.

As a law enforcement officer with 33 years of experience, I’ve seen firsthand the devastating effects of poor policy and even poorer outcomes in our communities. I’ve walked the neighborhoods that politicians only visit during election season. I’ve watched crime rise, families suffer, and communities collapse under the weight of broken promises. But I’ve also seen something else—something more disturbing. I’ve watched politicians get richer. I’ve watched them climb the political ladder, build personal brands, and cash in on the very chaos they claim to care about. They pass policies that don’t work, then give speeches pretending they do. Meanwhile, the people on the ground — the single mothers, the struggling fathers, the kids caught in cycles of violence — are left with nothing but slogans, while those in power live comfortably off the dysfunction. The system may be broken for us, but it’s working just fine for them.

Until we demand outcomes over optics, we will continue to be ruled by those who perform best, not lead best. The poor will stay poor. The streets will stay dangerous. And the only ones getting richer will be the ones preaching “justice” while cashing in.

Mortgage Fraud Allegations Rock New York AG Letitia James

New York Attorney General Letitia James is under federal scrutiny following a formal criminal referral issued by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), alleging she falsified key mortgage documents and misrepresented property information to obtain favorable loan terms. The case, detailed in a federal letter dated April 14, 2025, is supported by investigative work from forensic accountant Sam E. Antar and now sits before the U.S. Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution.

According to the FHFA’s Director William J. Pulte, James may have committed violations of multiple federal laws, including wire fraud, bank fraud, and false statements to financial institutions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, 1344, and 1014. The charges stem from two separate properties—one in Virginia and the other in Brooklyn—where James allegedly manipulated mortgage applications and occupancy declarations to gain access to government-backed loans and reduced interest rates.

A Trail of Paperwork

Antar’s investigation, built on public records, court filings, mortgage documents, and property permits, raises serious ethical and legal questions about James’s conduct. His findings show a consistent pattern of discrepancies and misstatements across nearly two decades.

In 2023, James purchased a home at in Norfolk, Virginia. In legal filings, including Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Form 3047, she designated this property as her “primary residence”—a classification that qualifies borrowers for lower interest rates. However, as a statewide elected official in New York, James is legally required to maintain her primary residence in New York. Complicating matters further, a New York City building permit dated July 15, 2024, lists her Brooklyn home as “James Residence,” confirming it remained occupied during that time.

The FHFA notes that mortgages for secondary residences typically come with higher interest rates—often 0.25% to 0.50% more—due to increased lending risks. Misrepresenting a second home as a primary residence to receive more favorable terms is considered mortgage fraud.

Brooklyn Misrepresentation

The scrutiny doesn’t end in Virginia. At the center of the second set of allegations is James’s long-held property at 296 Lafayette Avenue in Brooklyn, NY. Records show the building has had a five-unit occupancy classification since at least 2001. Yet, James has repeatedly described the property as a four-unit building on mortgage applications, building permits, and filings for government assistance, including a 2011 application under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP).

That misclassification may have enabled her to obtain conforming loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are only available for properties with four or fewer residential units. These loans typically offer better interest rates and terms designed to assist lower- and middle-income homeowners.

The FHFA also documented a 2019 refinance of the Brooklyn property where the same four-unit claim was used. According to the agency, the continued misrepresentation likely allowed James to bypass stricter lending criteria that would have applied to a five-family dwelling—including higher interest rates, larger down payments, and commercial loan requirements.

A Pattern of Falsification

Further undermining James’s credibility are historic filings dating back to the 1980s. In both 1983 and 2000, James signed mortgage applications listing her and her father as “husband and wife”—a legal misstatement the FHFA says was used to meet mortgage approval requirements.

Though older, these examples suggest a long-standing pattern of falsifying information for financial benefit. The FHFA compared this case to recent high-profile mortgage fraud prosecutions, such as the conviction of former Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby for similar misrepresentations. So that means there is already established case law if James is actually charged.

Political Fallout

The criminal referral lands at a politically charged moment. James has played a high-profile role in targeting Donald Trump and other political figures. Ironically, she now faces a legal scenario similar to those she has publicly championed. The FHFA’s referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche has triggered bipartisan calls for accountability, especially given James’s top law enforcement role in New York State.

As of now, Letitia James has not publicly responded to the criminal referral or the findings laid out in the FHFA’s letter. However, the charges, if pursued, could mark a turning point not only in her political career but in public trust in the office she holds.

The investigation underscores a broader issue: that no one—not even a state’s chief legal officer—is above the law. With court filings, property records, and mortgage documents painting a detailed picture of alleged fraud, the coming months could determine whether James’s legal fate mirrors that of other public officials who misused the public trust for personal financial gain.

FHFA LETTER ON INVESTIGATION OF NYSAG TISH JAMES by damonkjones on Scribd

NYCD-16/15 General Meeting Brings Together Community on Holiday Weekend

0

On Sunday, April 13, 2025, 85 community members gathered at Yonkers Public Library for the NYCD-16/15 General Meeting — a notable turnout, especially on a holiday weekend. The meeting served as both a forum for civic engagement and a platform for thoughtful, forward-thinking conversation on local and national issues.

One of the meeting’s highlights was a keynote presentation by Dr. Alexandria Connally, who
delivered a compelling talk on the topic of de-escalation in conflict resolution. With deep insight
and clarity, Dr. Connally addressed how inherent bias influences our perceptions
and interactions, particularly during tense or emotionally charged situations. She underscored the
importance of recognizing and naming those biases in ourselves as a first step toward more
constructive dialogue.

Dr. Connally also stressed the necessity of establishing common ground, especially at the start of
a conversation or conflict. Even small, shared connections — a mutual interest, a shared
experience, or a simple point of agreement — can serve as a foundation for more empathetic
communication. Her session included a dynamic role-playing exercise that illustrated how calm,
deliberate responses can de-escalate even the most intense emotional outbursts, allowing space
for understanding and resolution.

The meeting also welcomed New York State Lieutenant Governor, the Honorable Antonio
Delgado, who provided a broader political and economic perspective. In his address, Lt. Gov.
Delgado offered a sobering yet hopeful analysis of both the state of New York and the national
political climate. He examined the current challenges facing the Democratic Party, particularly
through the lens of what he described as the “economic hollowing” of America — a decades-long-
long trend driven by corporate consolidation, the erosion of local economies, and systemic
inequality.

Lt. Gov. Delgado called for renewed grassroots engagement, economic justice, and bold
policymaking as antidotes to the growing disconnect between political institutions and working-
class communities. His remarks were both a call to action and a reflection on the role of civic
organizations like NYCD-16/15 in shaping the future.

In addition to the speakers, the meeting included a robust discussion on legislative priorities that
must remain in focus in the coming weeks. Topics ranged from affordable housing and public
education to environmental justice and criminal justice reform. Attendees also reviewed recent
protests and actions, while planning for upcoming demonstrations and community mobilization
efforts.

The energy and turnout for the meeting underscored the continued commitment of NYCD-16/15
members to shape a more just and equitable future — even on a holiday weekend. The
conversations held were not only timely but essential, offering both education and inspiration to
all in attendance.

Where is the Outrage When a Black Child Dies?

A 16-year-old boy named Sincere Jazmin was gunned down in broad daylight in Queens. Shot in the chest after stepping off a school bus. He collapsed outside a deli while the shooter fled down Liberty Avenue. His blood soaked the concrete. His dreams were cut short. Another Black child was buried too soon.

He wanted to be a rapper. A designer. He had talent. He had time. And then someone took it.

The media’s decision to label Sincere Jazmin a “drill rapper” is not just irresponsible—it’s a calculated act of narrative control. Instead of honoring a 16-year-old boy who was murdered after getting off a school bus, they reduce him to a stereotype that suggests he somehow invited violence into his life. This is how the media sanitizes tragedy when the victim is a young Black male. Meanwhile, we’ve seen the same outlets bend over backwards to portray MS-13 gang members—some charged with brutal, premeditated violence—as misunderstood migrants or victims of a broken system. They highlight their difficult upbringings, emphasize redemption, and caution against “criminalizing” them.

But when it comes to Black children in our communities, there is no grace, no empathy, no benefit of the doubt. These headlines reinforce blame and feed the public, preparing them to turn the page. Sincere was a student, a son, a dreamer with aspirations—but instead of mourning his loss, the press chose to reframe his identity in a way that excuses silence from political leaders and indifference from the public. This is not journalism—it’s deflection. And it happens far too often when the victim is Black, and the shooter isn’t wearing a badge.

And what did we hear from the political class?

Nothing.

Where is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whose district touches this borough? Where is Letitia James, our state’s top law enforcement officer? Where is Hakeem Jeffries, the highest-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives? Where is Jasmine Crockett, who finds time to speak out on everything but the bloodshed of our young black boys?

The same voices who raise hell over MS-13 deportations and foreign detainees go mute when a Black boy dies in his own neighborhood.

Surveillance footage shows the killer calmly walking away. To date, no arrest has been made. And yet, from the very officials elected to protect us—silence.

As a 33-year veteran of law enforcement, I’ve spoken out against police brutality—and I’ve also spoken out against the senseless shootings tearing apart Black communities. The fight for justice doesn’t stop at the police station. It must continue on our own blocks.

We cannot cry “Black Lives Matter” to the government, yet refuse to take responsibility for protecting Black life within our communities. We cannot scream about threats to democracy and then look away from the threats to everyday people’s lives—mothers afraid to let their children outside, elders dodging crime, fathers burying sons.

This is hypocrisy in a democracy.

The same intellectuals and politicians who point fingers at Washington do nothing to make sure their own constituents are safe. They give fiery speeches on Capitol Hill while children in their districts are bleeding out on the streets.

Let’s be clear: If Sincere Jazmin had been killed by a police officer, the cameras would be rolling and the protests would be loud. But because he was killed by someone who looks like him, he’s treated as a footnote.

“When criminals are emboldened and the innocent are ignored, don’t call it progress—call it surrender.”

I didn’t spend three decades in law enforcement just to watch us throw away accountability—on either side of the badge. Justice isn’t one-sided. You don’t get to cherry-pick which Black lives matter. The ones killed by cops. The ones killed by neighbors. The ones forgotten. They all matter—or none of it does.

If we truly believe Black lives matter, then we must defend them every time, not just when it’s politically convenient. That means calling out state violence and street violence. That means holding government accountable and demanding accountability within our own communities.

Because if we only speak up when it fits the narrative, we’re not seeking justice—we’re playing politics.

And a child’s life should never be reduced to a political prop.

Our children don’t need more slogans. They need safe streets. And if our leaders won’t protect them, maybe it’s time we stop calling them leaders.

No Country for Legal Process: The Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case and the Hypocrisy of Immigration Politics

The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a man deported to El Salvador and now at the center of a political firestorm—has become the latest example of how immigration, law, and public opinion collide in America. But the deeper issue isn’t just immigration. It’s how facts are manipulated, laws are politicized, and emotion is used to erode standards—a pattern with real consequences for Black America.

Let’s set the record straight.

Abrego Garcia originally received a court-ordered stay of deportation because he claimed that returning to El Salvador would endanger his life due to gang violence. That is a legitimate and often life-saving process under U.S. asylum law. However, two courts—an immigration judge and an appellate panel—subsequently ruled that he was a member of MS-13, which is classified as a foreign terrorist organization. That classification nullified any asylum protections and made him legally ineligible to remain in the country.

That legal distinction matters. He wasn’t deported because of a clerical error. He was deported because the courts determined he was no longer entitled to protection under U.S. law. Everything that followed was consistent with federal statute.

When Emotion Replaces Evidence

The media wants this to be a story about cruelty. But the facts tell a different story. Once someone is deemed a threat or ineligible under immigration law, the system is obligated to act. Sympathy does not substitute for legal standing. And emotional activism does not erase legal precedent.

The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed this principle with a 9–0 ruling, stating that no judge or court can compel the President or Secretary of State to retrieve someone from another country. If El Salvador wants to return him, the U.S. would facilitate—but it cannot force the issue.

What’s disturbing is how the facts have been sidelined in favor of a narrative.

This Didn’t Start With Trump

Despite the headlines, this is not a new phenomenon. Bill Clinton called for the removal of “illegal aliens who commit crimes.” Barack Obama oversaw more deportations than any president in U.S. history—over 3 million—and his administration ramped up interior enforcement, workplace raids, and expedited removals.

In fact, Obama’s record was so aggressive that immigrant advocacy groups began calling him the “Deporter-in-Chief.” But somehow, we’ve forgotten all of that. There were no nationwide protests. No emotional panel discussions. No talk of cruelty. Why? Because his tone was polished. His image was marketable. But the policy? It was far more brutal than anything Trump had even attempted in his first term.

Yes, President Trump is bombastic—he says things that sometimes don’t make sense. But at the end of the day, whether we like it or not, what he’s doing now is no different from what Democratic presidents have done before him. I know this firsthand. As a 33-year veteran in law enforcement and a member of national Black law enforcement organizations, we spoke out against these very same tactics under previous administrations. Back then, the media barely covered it. We specifically opposed programs like 287(g), which allowed local police departments to collaborate directly with ICE.

All Trump is doing now is washing and repeating what Clinton and Obama already did. The only difference is this time, the press is calling it a threat to democracy.

The difference is not in the enforcement. The difference is in the ideological lens through which the enforcement is reported. That’s not justice. That’s selective memory.

Sovereignty and Legal Process Still Matter

El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele has refused to return Garcia, stating that his country is now safe and that the gang threat no longer exists. Whether one agrees with Bukele’s assessment or not is irrelevant. Sovereign nations are not obligated to act based on American opinion, and the Supreme Court affirmed that domestic courts cannot dictate foreign policy.

What This Means for Black America

Here’s what we must confront: when laws become negotiable, when emotions override courts, and when criminality is reframed as victimhood—Black America pays the highest price.

We are already living in communities where crime goes unpunished, where violence is normalized, and where the legal system often turns a blind eye in the name of “reform.” But when criminals are treated as victims, the real victims—law-abiding Black families, children, and seniors—are erased from the narrative.

If Kilmar Abrego Garcia, once ruled to have gang affiliations, is now recast as a misunderstood migrant, should we start looking at the man who robs grandma on her way home from church as a victim too? Should the young shooter on a city block be viewed as a tragic figure instead of a threat to the community?

That’s the logic we’re importing into our own communities. And the results are plain to see. Black neighborhoods across the country are already riddled with crime and violence, yet the loudest voices in media and politics seem more concerned about individuals who weren’t even born here, who violated immigration laws, and who were ruled ineligible by courts.

Where’s the national outcry for the Black child killed in a crossfire? For the single mother afraid to let her kids play outside? For the families living under the weight of daily violence? Just recently in Queens, a 12-year-old boy was shot and killed while getting off a school bus—an act of senseless violence that barely made it past the local news cycle. No protests. No national figures at the scene. No urgent press conferences. Meanwhile, elected officials like Jasmine Crockett, AOC, and New York Attorney General Letitia James are quick to rally behind individuals with confirmed MS-13 affiliations—cases that were vetted and ruled on by the courts. The same passion isn’t shown for the families in our own neighborhoods who live under the daily threat of violence. When defending criminals becomes more politically useful than defending innocent victims, it’s not justice—it’s performance. And the cost is being paid in blood by communities the media claims to care about.

Instead, we’re being told to sympathize with someone deported under longstanding immigration law, someone whose initial protection was reversed by legal review—not by political vendetta.

Final Thought: Standards Over Sympathy

We are not against immigration. We are not against compassion. But we are against the erosion of legal standards that disproportionately harm the very communities they claim to protect.

Black America must stop letting emotional manipulation distract us from outcomes. If the law doesn’t apply equally, it doesn’t protect us at all. And if our political leaders are more interested in championing lawbreakers than defending law-abiding citizens, then we are being governed by theater—not justice.

Real justice doesn’t bend to feelings. It demands facts, process, and standards.

We must demand the same.

Money Mondays: Tamika Cunningham of TR Insurance Agency

0

On this episode of Money Mondays, Damon K. Jones sits down with Tamika Cunningham of TR Insurance Agency to talk about the power of financial protection in Black communities. From life insurance to wealth transfer strategies, Tamika breaks down what every family needs to know about securing their future. We discuss: Why insurance is a cornerstone of generational wealth. Common myths in our community about life insurance: How to use insurance as an investment tool, Tips for small business owners, parents, and first-time policyholders. Don’t miss this empowering conversation that could change the way you think about money, legacy, and protection. 🟢 Tune in, take notes, and tell a friend — it’s time to elevate.

📲 Follow us: Twitter: @BlackWestchesterInstagram: @BlackWestchester – Website: www.BlackWestchester.com

#MoneyMondays #BlackWealth #FinancialLiteracy #TRInsurance #TamikaCunningham #BlackWestchester

🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5708472810733568

Elevation Nation With Tasha Young – With Guest Yolanda Durant Talking IRS Secrets Unlocked, Taxes, Payment Plans & Small Biz Setups

Welcome to the Monday, April 14th episode of Black Westchester presents Elevation Nation with Tasha Young. Our special guest was Yolanda Durant from the IRS to break down what you really need to know this tax season. We covered:

✅ Current tax filing deadlines

✅ Payment programs for individuals & small businesses

✅ How to set up your business the right way

✅ Understanding income tax & withholdings

✅ Tips for staying on the IRS’s good side. Don’t miss this important and empowering conversation that could save you time, money, and stress!

📺 Tune in live weekly and bring your questions! 🔔 Subscribe to Black Westchester and hit the bell for updates.

#ElevationNation #BlackWestchester #IRS #YolandaDurant #Taxes2025 #SmallBusinessTips #TaxSeason #FinancialLiteracy #BlackExcell

🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5708472810733568

New Rochelle Assistant Principal Is April Big Deal This National Volunteer Month

0

Port Chester’s Gregory Middleton Recognized this Volunteer Month by Big Brothers Big Sisters of Westchester & Putnam

-New Rochelle Assistant Principal reinforces motto “It Takes Little to Be Big”

Port Chester, NY (April 14, 2025) April is National Volunteer Month, and Big Brothers Big Sisters of Westchester & Putnam (BBBSWP) continues to highlight the inspiring stories of its volunteers, namely Bigs (mentors), with the Big Deal initiative launched in January 2025. This month, the organization is recognizing Port Chester resident, Gregory Middleton. He has been a Big to his Little A.N. for three years and is an Assistant Principal in the City School District of New Rochelle. 

Middleton said that he was inspired to become a Big as he saw the need for mentors, especially men, in and from communities of color. “The experience has been a confirmation of something I’ve long known professionally, and that is when you’re working with young people, you can’t necessarily look for or expect immediate growth or change. If you do, you may be setting yourself up for a great deal of disappointment.  You must be ok with knowing that whatever impact you may make may happen long after that young person has left your life. When they become adults, they will look back and remember, like the rest of us do, not so much who bought them stuff, but who made them feel like they mattered.” 

Middleton said that he and A.N. enjoy time together, and trampoline parks are a favorite since A.N. is very active. He said that he exposes A.N. to activities and places that he may never have been exposed to before – American Museum of Natural History, the Statue of Liberty, and the Central Park Zoo, the Barclays Center for a Brooklyn Nets game – a first for both.  

“Our motto is, ‘It takes little to be Big,’ and people who may be thinking about mentoring may have it in their mind that it’s a huge time commitment. I would say to them that consistency is more important than the amount of time,” said Middleton. “If you spend time with your mentee one Saturday each month and maybe check in by text, call, etc., in between, that is ok. Just be sure that you’ll be there when you say you will.  That’s where the consistency comes in. Most of these young people have suffered enough disappointments in their lives.  When you say you’re going to show up, make sure you show up.”

“The Big Deal initiative celebrates mentoring by spotlighting a Big from Westchester or Putnam County monthly, allowing them to share their experiences to inspire others to become mentors. This month is especially important as people all over the world recognize the power of volunteerism and how it can change lives,” said Ann Ellsworth, CEO of BBBSWP. 

The 2024 Economic Impact Report from Big Brothers Big Sisters highlights why mentorship matters:

Evidence-Based Impact:

– Mentored youth are 10% more likely to attend college.

– Alumni Littles are less reliant on social services and have stronger social connections.

– Former Littles earn $56,000 more in lifetime earnings than non-mentored peers.

Empowering Communities: Mentorship builds resilience, helping young people overcome adversity and fostering a more inclusive society.

A Simple, Profound Solution: Connecting caring adults with youth creates transformative relationships that strengthen communities.

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Westchester & Putnam is dedicated to creating and supporting one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the potential in children and change lives. Through various programs designed to meet the needs of the community, the organization aims to build brighter futures for children and empower them to achieve success. 

Sister to Sister International (STSI) Nominates Dr. Marcia V. Keizs for her Philanthropic Efforts

1

Congratulations to the Association of Development Officers on the success of their Annual  Philanthropy Breakfast held at Tappan Hill Mansion on Wednesday, March 12th, 2025. They recognized individuals, organizations, and the corporate sector for providing outstanding service to the community through acts of philanthropy.  

The Co-Chairs of the  event, Ms. Monica Spears and Ms. Laura deBuys, noted in their remarks that the “generosity  and passion of the people gathered in the room  are  a wonderful reminder of the  power of philanthropy.”

Dr. Marcia V. Keizs was one of the esteemed honorees nominated by Sister to Sister International.  Dr. Cheryl Brannan, founder of Sister to Sister International, said, “Dr. Marcia Keizs was nominated for her outstanding fundraising support as Co-chair of our very successful  STSI 30th Anniversary Gala, garnering several new sponsorships. She also serves as a steering committee member and staunch champion of the STEAM Summer Camp and Academy,  supporting both our fundraising and recruitment efforts. We were pleased to have a great group of STSI members, consultants, and friends on hand to cheer Dr. Keizs on and express appreciation for her remarks with a beautiful bouquet of flowers. 

Dr. Marcia V. Keizs has had a distinguished career at The City University of New York for almost fifty years in a variety of capacities, where she gained recognition as an excellent classroom teacher before moving into administrative leadership.

After many years of service on five CUNY campuses and the CUNY Central Office, Dr. Keizs assumed the  Presidency at York College /CUNY. Her leadership at York College / CUNY (2005-2019)  was marked by outstanding academic achievements: securing national accreditation for existing programs; creating  new undergraduate academic offerings in Aviation Management, Pharmaceutical Science, Journalism, Generic Nursing, Logistics and Supply Chain, and Health Science; expanding graduate programs at the master’s level in Pharmaceutical Science and Business,  Physician Assistant Studies and Social Work.

Dr. Keizs has served on a number of not-for profit boards, was the Founding Editor of The  New York Carib News and continues to be an engaged member of the Bronx and Westchester – communities where she has resided, Her affiliations include the Westchester Branch of American Association of University Women, Sister to Sister International Inc., and   Wakefield Grace United Methodist Church. 

Other event honorees included: Ms. Gwen Salmo, Fundraising  Professional,  Friends of Karen; Ms. Sofia Feinstien, Youth Philanthropist- Founder of UNI-T Fashion; Shop Rite as Outstanding Corporate Partner;  and Ms. Alison Paul – Peter J Gallagher Award for  Leadership and Service, President of Alison Paul Grant Writing and Consulting. In addition to the awards, proclamations from legislators were given to the honorees. Those included the Declaration of March 16th, 2025, as Marcia V. Keizs Day in Westchester by County Legislator David Imamura, which was posted on the Jumbotron at Westchester County Center.

Tariff War: China Has Pulled Back the Curtain, The Luxury Industry Isn’t What You Think

Tariffs are not typically designed to educate consumers—but that’s exactly what they’ve done.

As the U.S.–China trade war heats up, something unexpected has emerged: Chinese manufacturers, in response to tariff pressure, have begun revealing their role in producing luxury goods sold under elite European labels. And in doing so, they’ve exposed a side of the luxury fashion industry most consumers never see.

Brands like Louis Vuitton and Gucci are at the center of this controversy.

Across Chinese social media, manufacturers have confirmed that components, materials, and even fully constructed handbags for these luxury giants are being produced in Chinese factories. What happens next is where the illusion takes form: the nearly completed bags are shipped to Italy or France, where minimal final touches—like hardware installation, logo embossing, or simple stitching—are performed. The products are then legally stamped “Made in Italy” or “Made in France.”

This labeling tactic exploits a trade law loophole: under World Trade Organization rules, a product’s country of origin is determined by where the “last substantial transformation” occurs. That means even if 80–90% of the labor and parts come from China, a final assembly step in Europe is enough to qualify for a European label.

The end result? A product that costs around $900-$1,200 to produce is sold for$5,000- $10,000 or more, based largely on branding, perceived heritage, and consumer ignorance about its true origin.

And it’s working—because most consumers never ask the question.

The issue here is not legality. What these companies are doing is permitted under current trade law. The issue is honesty. Consumers believe they are paying for European craftsmanship when, in reality, they are paying for a mass-produced item with a European label added at the last step.

This matters especially in a market like the United States, where Black Americans rank among the highest per-capita consumers of luxury fashion. Designer bags, shoes, and accessories are marketed as status symbols—but that perception is being sold at a steep price, often without real value to match. These are not heirlooms handcrafted by artisans in Milan. In many cases, they are factory-line goods produced with the same methods and materials as mid-market products.

What’s really being sold is branding, not craftsmanship.

A Louis Vuitton bag made almost entirely in a Chinese factory is not materially different from a $100 bag found in a department store. The distinction lies in perception—backed by celebrity endorsements, marketing campaigns, and the power of a label. The price tag reflects what people think they’re buying, not what they’re actually getting.

The revelations coming out of China show just how wide that gap has become. The luxury business model relies on keeping consumers focused on image, not information. But the current tariff war has flipped that dynamic, if only briefly, by forcing transparency into the conversation.

And that transparency reveals a simple truth: you’re paying thousands for a story, not a product.

This is not an argument against buying what you like. People are free to spend however they choose. But the least consumers deserve is clarity. And what we’re learning now is that the “luxury” label has become less about origin and more about manipulation.

The most tragic part of this illusion is its real-world impact in communities where image often carries high social currency. In some Black communities, people have been robbed—or even killed—over designer bags, chasing or defending what they believed were symbols of success and status. Meanwhile, all over social media, we see viral videos of smash-and-grab robberies in luxury stores, with crowds looting shelves of bags that retail for thousands of dollars—but are, in reality, mass-produced products with inflated price tags. The truth revealed by global manufacturing disclosures is sobering: many of these bags are no different in material quality than items sold at Walmart. The difference isn’t in the craftsmanship—it’s in the marketing. And that marketing has made people risk their lives for what amounts to nothing more than a name and a markup.

If the current administration’s trade policies have done anything, it’s this: They’ve accidentally exposed how global corporations—especially in the fashion industry—use legal loopholes, cheap labor, and branding to maximize profit at the consumer’s expense.

And here’s where the situation could escalate. If trade tensions continue, China holds a powerful card it hasn’t fully played: it could begin openly producing and selling high-end handbags—made in the same factories, with the same materials, and often by the same workers currently producing for European brands—at a fraction of the price. With the technical expertise and supply chains already in place, China could flood the global market with unbranded or China-branded luxury alternatives that are functionally identical to $5,000-$10,000 European bags.

This wouldn’t just affect Louis Vuitton or Gucci. Brands like Prada, Burberry, Coach, and even labels under the Michael Kors and Tory Burch umbrellas all rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing for parts or full production. Doing so wouldn’t just disrupt pricing—it would shatter the illusion of exclusivity that the luxury industry depends on. And once that illusion is gone, the entire market begins to collapse.

And if we are getting nothing else from President Trump, we are getting the truth about how corporations have long taken advantage of Black Americans’ spending—offering prestige on the surface, but little value underneath. Like it or not, Truth is Truth!