Home Blog Page 102

Black Law Enforcement Group Condemns Nicole Wallace, Rachel Maddow and MSNBC for Dismissing 13-Year-Old Cancer Survivor’s Honor

A national organization of Black Law Enforcement Professionals named Blacks in Law Enforcement of America has strongly condemned MSNBC and anchor Rachel Maddow for dismissing a heartfelt moment during former President Donald Trump’s recent address. The group is calling for an official apology after Maddow labeled as a “hoax” Trump’s recognition of DJ Daniel, a 13-year-old cancer survivor who was made an honorary Secret Service officer.

A Moment That Transcended Politics

During the address, Trump shared DJ Daniel’s inspiring journey, noting that in 2018, the young boy was diagnosed with brain cancer and given only five months to live. More than six years later, DJ, dressed in a Houston police uniform, sat alongside his father in the gallery of the House of Representatives as he was honored.

“In 2018, DJ was diagnosed with brain cancer. The doctors gave him five months at most to live. That was more than six years ago,” Trump said, prompting a standing ovation from many in attendance. Trump then announced that DJ would be made an honorary Secret Service officer, recognizing the young boy’s resilience and lifelong dream of serving in law enforcement.

While many saw this as a unifying moment, Maddow’s response on MSNBC was dismissive, suggesting the event was staged. Her remarks have since sparked widespread backlash.

Black Law Enforcement Group Demands Apology

The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Professionals has expressed deep disappointment in the lack of humanity displayed by Democrats present at the address, many of whom refused to stand or applaud DJ Daniel’s recognition. The group further denounced MSNBC Nicole Wallace and Maddow for their comments, arguing that children should be off-limits to political inflammatory rhetoric.

“As a seasoned news anchors, Wallace Maddow—and MSNBC as a whole—should know by now that attacking a child, especially one battling cancer, is unacceptable. Children should never be used as collateral in political warfare,” the organization stated.

They are now demanding an official apology from Maddow Nicole Wallace and MSNBC, arguing that dismissing DJ’s moment on a national platform was a disservice to all children fighting for their lives.

A Growing Divide in Political Decorum

The controversy highlights deepening divisions in political discourse, where even stories of survival and perseverance are met with skepticism and partisanship. Critics argue that Maddow’s comments reflect a growing lack of empathy in political media, where opposition to Trump often takes precedence over acknowledging genuine human moments.

Meanwhile, DJ Daniel’s story continues to resonate with many, serving as a reminder that some moments should rise above politics.

PBP Radio With Guests Retired Corrections Sergeant Israel Sanchez & Conrad Tillard

Welcome to another powerful episode of Black Westchester presents The People Before Politics Radio Show, where we bring you important news from a Black perspective that mainstream media won’t cover and give you that Real Talk For The Community.

This week, we’re delving into the ongoing strike at New York State Correctional Facilities. Our special guests include Israel Sanchez, a retired Corrections Sergeant who served 26 years at the infamous Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

Sergeant Sanchez will share his firsthand insights on prison conditions and the reasons behind the strike. At the same time, Legislator Nolan will explain why local government officials are standing in solidarity with correctional officers and what policy changes he’s advocating for. Get the unfiltered truth about what’s happening behind prison walls across New York State and learn about the political response to this growing crisis.

Also on the show is our brother, Baptist Minister, Radio Host, Activist, Politician, and Author Conrad Tillard talking about the state of the Black Community. Tillard was, in his early years, a prominent minister of the Nation of Islam. At age 25, he was appointed Minister of Mosque No. 7 in Harlem, a position formerly held by Malcolm X. He was known as the Hip-Hop Minister and was responsible for being a peacekeeper in beefs between artists.

People Before Politics Radio, Giving You Real Talk For The Community Since 2014!

Black Westchester presents the People Before Politics Radio Show every Sunday night, 6-8 PM, simulcasting live on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube and archived on BlackWestchester.com. Giving you that Real Talk For The Community since 2014.

To support the Black Westchester and the People Before Politics Radio Show, which provides the News With The Black Point Of view and gives you the real talk for the community for free, make a donation via PayPal at www.PayPal.me/BlackWestchesterMag. In the words of Ray Charles, “One of these days, and it [might not be] long, You’re gonna look for [us], and [we’ll] be gone.” Support independent, Black-free media!

Subscribe, hit the notification bell, and join the conversation this Sunday. At Black Westchester, we always put People Before Politics!

As always, you can follow us on Facebook, InstagramLinkedIn, and YouTube

Contributions and Donations can be made via PayPal.

PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE! HELP US SPREAD INDEPENDENT NEWS!

Celebrating The Life & Legacy Of Alice E. Roker

Alice Elizabeth Roker was a trailblazing figure and cherished member of the Yorktown Heights community. She passed away on February 10, 2025. Born on July 11, 1947, in New York, NY, Alice lived a life marked by professionalism, community service, and an unwavering dedication to her loved ones. She was 77 years old. She made history as the first Democrat, the first African American, and the first woman to serve in elective office in Yorktown’s history. She was described by those who knew her as a dedicated citizen.

“Her death is a loss for the community she loved and enthusiastically supported. I first got to know Alice in her role as Town Clerk. Not only did she swear me in when I was first elected as a Councilman, but she also signed my marriage license. I then had the pleasure of serving with her on the Town Board. And while we were in opposite parties, I found her to be sensible, reasonable, and willing to compromise. With Alice, there was never a question as to her determination to put the best interests of the residents first. Even after she retired from elected office, Alice offered sound guidance to me and many others,” Yorktown Town Supervisor Ed Lachterman shared.

Alice, a graduate of UCLA with a Bachelor of Arts, paved her way as a journalist, where her excellence in reporting was recognized with an Emmy and a New York Broadcaster’s Association award during her time at WNBC. Her commitment to truth and public service led her to a distinguished career in local government. In 1989, she was elected as the town clerk of Yorktown Heights, a position she held with honor and diligence for many years. Alice’s role as town historian further showcased her love for the community and her desire to preserve its rich heritage. Most notably, she became the first African American in Yorktown’s history to sit on the town government, paving the way for future generations to follow in her footsteps.

The Honorable Alice E. Roker [Photo Credit: Halston Media Staff]

Alice’s life was not solely defined by her professional achievements but also by her personal interests and the love she bestowed upon her family. She was an avid gardener, finding joy in the tranquility of nurturing growth and beauty within her surroundings. Above all, Alice cherished the time she spent with her friends, sharing in laughter and creating memories that would last a lifetime.

Those who knew Alice would describe her as loving, wise, and kind—words that only begin to touch on the incredible woman she was. Her guidance and wisdom were sought by many, and her kindness touched the lives of countless individuals in her community.

“The residents of Yorktown were lucky to have her as their elected representative for over 30 years,” shared Diana Quast, Yorktown Town Clerk. “Alice lit up every room with her smile and always knew how to make people laugh and feel comfortable. She treated everyone with respect and compassion. To paraphrase a quote by author H. Jackson Brown, Alice earned her success based on service to others, not at the expense of others.”

“Alice Roker served as the face of Town Hall as Yorktown’s Town Clerk for a quarter-century,” Halston Media News wrote in her remembrance.

Alice leaves behind a legacy of love and leadership, survived by her son, Gregory Bell; her daughter, Courtney Roker Laga; her son-in-law, Wesley Laga; and her granddaughter, Sky Clara, who will carry forward her spirit of compassion and fortitude. Her presence in their lives was a source of endless joy and inspiration, and her memory will continue to be a guiding light for them and all who knew her.

“She was a dedicated public servant who gave so much to the Yorktown community through decades of service in town government. She was an inspiration to many and will be dearly missed,” New York State Senator Pete Harckham shared on Instagram.

Her passing leaves a void in the hearts of those who loved her, but her spirit will forever remain a part of the community she helped shape and the lives she touched. May Alice Elizabeth Roker rest in peace, knowing that her legacy will continue to inspire for generations to come.

“Alice Roker was more than just our Town Clerk – she was a trailblazer who transformed how local government served its citizens,” said Jann Mirchandani, Chair of the Yorktown Democratic Committee. “The Yorktown Democratic Committee extends its deepest condolences to Ms. Roker’s family, friends, and all who were touched by her remarkable life of public service.”

We extend our sincere condolences to the Roker family on their loss and thank them for sharing this special woman with us. We celebrate the life and legacy of Alice E. Roker, who was a true Black Westchester Legend!

Aleida Castillo Announces Her Candidacy For Mount Vernon City Council

On Monday, March 3rd, Aleida Castillo officially announced her intent to run for Mount Vernon City Council in the Tuesday, June 24th Democratic Primary (see video below).

Aleida Castillo, a dedicated community leader with over 14 years of service in Mount Vernon, is proud to announce her candidacy for the Mount Vernon City Council. With a rich background in public service, business development, and community advocacy, Castillo aims to bring transformative change to the city by focusing on key issues that matter most to its residents.

Key Issues of Aleida Castillo’s Campaign:

  1. Workforce Housing:
    Castillo is committed to ensuring that all residents can afford to live in Mount Vernon. She advocates for workforce housing solutions that cater to individuals who earn too much to qualify for government subsidies but not enough for luxury housing. Her goal is to bridge this gap and provide affordable living options for all.
  2. Affordable Utilities:
    Recognizing the burden of escalating energy costs on residents, Castillo pledges to tackle high utility bills in Mount Vernon. She plans to lead initiatives aimed at reducing these expenses, thereby improving the quality of life for all community members.
  3. A City of Opportunities:
    Castillo envisions Mount Vernon as a hub for job opportunities, inspiration, growth, and nurturing communities. She intends to introduce legislation that supports economic development, job training programs, and local business support to foster a thriving city for both the young and the young at heart.

About Aleida Castillo:

Originally from the Dominican Republic, Aleida Castillo immigrated to the United States over 30 years ago, beginning her high school years in Miami, Florida. She has been a close advisor to political campaigns throughout New York State, including serving as an advisor to MSNBC Legal Analyst Mimi Rocah during her 2020 District Attorney Primary win in Westchester County. Castillo’s public relations and business development expertise have been sought after by non-governmental organizations, corporations, and government agencies for her ability to connect diverse communities and bring about win-win solutions in challenging environments.

In the late 2000s, Castillo moved to Mount Vernon with her two young daughters, seeking greater opportunities. As a Black Latina, she found pride in raising her children in a community where global Black identity could empower their sense of self. She ran a re-entry program at Grace Baptist Church, studied real estate, and later opened a daycare center to stay close to her children after facing personal challenges, including a car accident.

Her journey of self-discovery and community service led her to Ghana, West Africa, in 2016, where she deepened her understanding of heritage, leadership, and economic empowerment. She was honored as the first Afro-Latina and Dominican Queen Mother in the Oti Region of Ghana, a title recognizing her commitment to cultural and economic development. This experience reaffirmed her lifelong mission: to help others realize their dreams, access opportunities, and thrive in a supportive community.

Aleida Castillo believes that economic stability and good leadership are key to a thriving city. She is dedicated to implementing innovative legislation that directly impacts residents’ physical and financial well-being. Castillo’s campaign is built on the principles of hiring, inspiring, revitalizing, and elevating Mount Vernon—summarized in her campaign acronym, H.I.R.E.

To learn more about her campaign, sign her petition, or get involved, visit her website https://votealeidacastillo.com or contact her campaign directly at (914) 768-1688.

Senate Democrats Block Bill Banning Transgender Athletes from Women’s Sports

In a contentious vote, Senate Democrats unanimously opposed a Republican-led bill aimed at preventing transgender women and girls from participating in female sports categories in federally funded schools. The bill, known as the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” failed to advance in the Senate, falling short of the 60 votes needed with a 51-45 tally.

The Debate Over Fairness and Inclusion

The proposed legislation sought to amend Title IX by narrowly defining sex based on biological characteristics at birth, effectively preventing transgender women and girls from competing in female sports. Republicans argued that the bill was essential to maintain fairness in women’s athletics, claiming that transgender athletes might possess a competitive advantage due to physical differences.

In contrast, Democrats and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups criticized the bill as discriminatory and an unnecessary form of government overreach. They argued that prohibiting transgender athletes from competing according to their gender identity would encourage exclusion, reinforce harmful stigmas, and exacerbate mental health struggles for transgender youth.

Political and Social Reactions

Republican lawmakers, led by Senator Tommy Tuberville, framed the bill as a measure to uphold the integrity of women’s sports. “This is about fairness,” Tuberville stated. “We must ensure that biological women have a level playing field in competition.”

On the other hand, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer characterized the bill as “an attack on transgender individuals,” asserting that it sought to incite division and restrict the rights of an already marginalized community. Civil rights organizations, including the Human Rights Campaign and the ACLU, praised Senate Democrats for rejecting a “harmful and unnecessary law.”

Public Opinion and Polling Data

Recent polls indicate that a significant majority of Americans, including many Democrats, support limiting transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports. For instance, a New York Times/Ipsos survey conducted in January 2025 found that 79% of respondents opposed allowing transgender female athletes—those assigned male at birth but who identify as female—to compete in women’s sports. Similarly, a Gallup poll from June 2023 reported that 69% of U.S. adults believe transgender athletes should compete only on teams aligning with their sex assigned at birth. These findings suggest that the Democratic opposition to the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” diverges from prevailing public opinion.

What Comes Next?

With the bill’s failure, the discussion about transgender participation in sports continues at both state and federal levels. Several Republican-led states have already enacted similar bans, and legal battles are ongoing regarding the constitutionality of these measures. Meanwhile, sports organizations like the NCAA have established guidelines to regulate transgender participation, often based on hormone therapy requirements and medical evaluations.

As the conversation persists, the clash between fairness in competition and the rights of transgender athletes remains a contentious issue in American politics and society. While supporters of the bill pledge to revisit the legislation in the future, advocates for transgender inclusion continue to advocate for policies that protect athletes’ rights regardless of gender identity.

Ukraine Peace Deal: Controversial White House Meeting, Criticism from Democrats, and Zelenskyy’s Renewed Commitment

The ongoing war in Ukraine has taken a new turn as diplomatic efforts intensify to achieve a possible peace deal. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is willing to return to the negotiating table despite facing political and diplomatic hurdles. A recent, highly publicized meeting at the White House between Zelenskyy and former U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked controversy, drawing criticism from Democrats and altering Ukraine’s approach to peace talks.

The White House Showdown

The meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump was anything but ordinary. Reports suggest that the two leaders engaged in a tense discussion about Ukraine’s future, military aid, and the possibility of peace with Russia. While Trump stressed the importance of an immediate ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution, Zelenskyy found himself in a tough situation, trying to balance Ukraine’s strategic interests with rising pressure from U.S. lawmakers. The meeting concluded on an uneasy note, with both leaders recognizing their differences but agreeing on the need for further negotiations.

Democratic Criticism and Political Fallout

The White House meeting drew backlash from prominent Democratic leaders, who accused Trump of undermining U.S. commitments to Ukraine and pressuring Zelenskyy into a rushed agreement. Many Democrats expressed worries that an early peace deal could benefit Russia while not ensuring long-term stability for Ukraine.

Additionally, some critics argue that Zelenskyy’s engagement with Trump indicates a desperation for ongoing U.S. support, as the Biden administration encounters growing challenges in securing congressional backing for further military aid to Kyiv. The Democratic leadership remains skeptical of Trump’s strategy, fearing that it could weaken Ukraine and embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The U.S. Financial Commitment to Ukraine

Since the start of the conflict, the United States has provided Ukraine with about $120 billion in military, financial, and humanitarian aid. This includes more than $70 billion allocated for security assistance, which encompasses weapons, training, and intelligence sharing. An additional $50 billion has been directed toward economic and humanitarian support, helping to stabilize Ukraine’s government and assist displaced civilians.

Additionally, Congress has allocated $182 billion for Ukraine-related assistance, with about $83 billion already disbursed and another $57 billion committed but not yet utilized. These financial commitments have ignited debate in Washington, with some lawmakers questioning the long-term feasibility of ongoing aid. Conversely, others highlight the strategic importance of supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.

Zelenskyy’s Renewed Commitment to Peace

Despite the political turbulence, Zelenskyy has reaffirmed his willingness to return to the negotiating table. He has proposed a step-by-step peace plan that includes establishing truces on missile and drone attacks, facilitating prisoner exchanges, and starting discussions on security guarantees.

Additionally, Zelenskyy has shown a willingness to sign a critical minerals and security agreement with the U.S. This deal could bolster Ukraine’s economic position while strengthening its connections with Western allies. This action is viewed as an effort to mend relations with the U.S. while ensuring that Ukraine remains strategically aligned with NATO and the larger Western coalition.

A Difficult Road Ahead

As Ukraine navigates this challenging diplomatic environment, the path to peace remains riddled with obstacles. The conflicting interests of global powers, domestic political pressures, and Russia’s position on the negotiations all contribute to the uncertainty of the peace process. However, Zelenskyy’s willingness to reengage in discussions suggests a potential turning point in the war.

The upcoming weeks will be critical in determining whether Ukraine and its allies can negotiate a sustainable peace deal or if the conflict will persist indefinitely. As the international community observes closely, the fate of Ukraine hangs in the balance, with diplomatic efforts ready to shape the future of the war-torn nation.

Can Trump’s Economic Strategy Deliver Before the Midterms?

As the 2026 midterm elections draw near, President Donald Trump faces a crucial challenge: can his administration’s economic strategy, especially its focus on tariffs and bringing back American manufacturing, produce tangible results in time to maintain Republican control over Congress? Historically, midterms often act as a referendum on a sitting president’s policies, and the GOP must demonstrate that its economic vision is not only ambitious but also effective.

The recent surge in investment announcements from corporate giants like Apple, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), and SoftBank indicates that Trump’s policies are at least impacting corporate decision-making. Apple’s unprecedented $500 billion commitment to U.S. manufacturing, TSMC’s $100 billion expansion in Arizona, and SoftBank’s $100 billion investment in U.S. artificial intelligence projects reflect a shift toward domestic production and technological innovation. However, these projects, while significant, will take years to fully materialize. The challenge for the Trump administration is to ensure that voters perceive tangible benefits—job creation, wage growth, and economic stability—before they head to the polls in November 2026, which is now just 20 months away.

With limited time, the pressure is on Trump to secure immediate economic wins. Historically, the party in power struggles during midterm elections, often losing control of one or both chambers of Congress. The Republican Party currently faces an uphill battle to maintain dominance in the House and Senate, and the effectiveness of Trump’s economic policies could be a key factor in shaping voter sentiment. The administration must not only speed up job creation but also tackle inflationary pressures and supply chain disruptions that could jeopardize these gains.

Trump’s approach is not without precedent. Previous presidents have used similar strategies, with mixed results. Ronald Reagan imposed tariffs on Japanese imports in the 1980s to protect American industries; while these tariffs benefited certain sectors, they also resulted in higher prices for consumers. George W. Bush’s steel tariffs in 2002 aimed to boost domestic production but were quickly rolled back following international backlash. Bill Clinton took a different approach—he focused on free trade agreements and tax incentives, which spurred economic growth but also contributed to the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs. Barack Obama, through the CHIPS and Science Act and renewable energy subsidies, promoted domestic tech investments, a trend that continues today. Trump’s challenge is to learn from these past policies—balancing protectionism with incentives—while providing quick, visible results to voters.

The question remains: is this the result of Trump’s tariff policies, or is it a continuation of previous government incentives like the CHIPS and Science Act? While tariffs on China have pushed companies to reconsider their supply chains, it is the generous tax breaks and subsidies introduced under the CHIPS Act that have truly attracted corporations to invest in American soil. If Trump wants to take full credit for this economic shift, his administration will need to build on these policies rather than merely relying on tariffs as a blunt instrument.

Yet, while Trump’s economic message centers around revitalizing American manufacturing, there are political landmines. Reports indicate that Republican lawmakers are avoiding town Halls, concerned about potential voter backlash regarding proposed budget cuts, including those impacting Medicaid. Internal party strife could complicate efforts to present a unified economic vision. The Republican Party’s success in the midterms will depend not just on economic performance but also on their ability to navigate public discontent and avoid self-inflicted wounds.

Trump’s path to midterm success depends on swift and noticeable economic improvements. The administration needs to collaborate with state and local governments to accelerate manufacturing projects, advocate for further corporate commitments, and develop a compelling public messaging campaign that showcases economic growth. Furthermore, the White House must stay vigilant about possible economic downturns or job losses in industries affected by tariffs, as these could damage the GOP’s position with crucial voter groups.

Trump’s economic strategy is to serve as a winning campaign narrative, the administration must accelerate project timelines, ensure visible job creation, and mitigate inflationary pressures that could erode voter confidence. Otherwise, Republicans risk repeating history: midterm losses due to unmet promises and economic discontent.

Democrats are already positioning themselves to take advantage of any perceived economic shortcomings. Their strategy revolves around highlighting delayed job growth, rising costs, and vulnerabilities in Trump’s trade policies. By emphasizing the risks of tariffs, potential job losses in certain industries, and economic instability, Democrats aim to rally key voter demographics—particularly working-class Americans and suburban moderates—who may feel the effects of economic uncertainty. Additionally, they plan to counter Trump’s America First narrative with a renewed focus on economic equity, climate investment, and technological innovation to appeal to younger and minority voters.

The next 20 months will decide whether Trump’s economic gamble succeeds—or if Democrats will effectively exploit the gaps in his policies and use them as a pathway to reclaiming congressional power.

The clock is ticking.

How Policing Has Failed Robert Peel’s Principles in the Black Community: A Critical Analysis

If you visit many national policing websites, you will frequently find Robert Peel cited as the father of modern policing. His nine principles, established in 1829, continue to be referenced as the foundation of ethical law enforcement. However, regarding policing Black communities, these very principles have long been ignored. Instead of upholding the ideals of public trust, limited use of force, and impartial service, American policing has relied on a different historical framework—one rooted in the legacy of slave patrols, Black Codes, and Jim Crow laws. While Peel’s principles aimed to create a policing system based on cooperation rather than oppression, the reality for Black communities in America has been characterized by control, systemic racism, and an ongoing cycle of criminalization.  

American policing today not only fails to uphold Peel’s ideals but was never genuinely aimed at applying them to Black communities. From the harsh enforcement of fugitive slave laws to contemporary racial profiling, police in the United States have operated with a racialized mandate that prioritizes surveillance and punishment over justice and service. While Peel envisioned a system where “the police are the public and the public are the police,” Black communities have instead faced a force that acts as an occupying power rather than a protector. 

The contrast between Peel’s vision and the lived experiences of Black communities is stark. Below, I analyze each of Peel’s nine principles, revealing how law enforcement has ignored, undermined, and outright betrayed them regarding policing Black individuals in America.

Principle 1: Crime Prevention Over Punishment

Peel’s Principle: “The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Modern policing in Black neighborhoods has prioritized punitive enforcement over crime prevention. The so-called War on Drugs disproportionately targeted Black Americans, resulting in mass incarceration instead of addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty, inadequate educational opportunities, and systemic disinvestment in Black communities. Rather than preventing crime through social programs, law enforcement has frequently relied on aggressive enforcement tactics, perpetuating a cycle of criminalization instead of ensuring community safety.

Principle 2: Public Trust as the Source of Police Power

Peel’s Principle: “The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Trust between law enforcement and Black Americans has been undermined by centuries of racial profiling, excessive force, and police killings of unarmed Black individuals. The deaths of people like George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Tamir Rice have only intensified the distrust. Police departments often operate with a sense of impunity, shielding officers from accountability. When communities lack trust in the police, cooperation diminishes, making effective law enforcement nearly impossible.

Principle 3: Securing Willing Cooperation Over Force

Peel’s Principle: “Police must secure the willing cooperation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Instead of securing cooperation, policing has often relied on intimidation, violence, and fear. Tactics like stop-and-frisk, racial profiling, and heavy-handed policing of minor offenses have alienated Black citizens. The over-policing of minor infractions, such as selling loose cigarettes (Eric Garner) or minor traffic violations (Sandra Bland), has created a system where Black people often fear police rather than see them as allies in law enforcement.

Principle 4: Reducing the Need for Force Through Public Cooperation

Peel’s Principle: “The degree of cooperation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Police in Black communities are far more likely to use physical force than in predominantly white neighborhoods. Data consistently shows that Black individuals are more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, and subjected to police violence more than white individuals for similar situations. behaviors. Instead of fostering cooperation, this aggressive approach exacerbates tensions, making force a self-perpetuating necessity rather than a last resort.

Principle 5: Absolute Impartiality and Fairness

Peel’s Principle: “Police seek and preserve public favor not by pandering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Policing has been far from impartial. The racial disparities in arrests, sentencing, and police stops highlight a justice system that disproportionately criminalizes Black people. White individuals committing the same offenses often receive lighter treatment, as seen in how white mass shooters are often apprehended alive, while unarmed Black individuals are killed for minor infractions or mere suspicion. This selective enforcement erodes any notion of fairness and justice in the Black community.

Principle 6: Minimal Use of Force

Peel’s Principle: “Police use physical force only when persuasion, advice, and warning are found to be insufficient to obtain public cooperation.”

Reality in Black Communities:
The police have failed to adhere to this principle, especially in their interactions with Black individuals. The killing of unarmed Black people by law enforcement has become a troubling trend, with officers often resorting to deadly force instead of seeking de-escalation. Even minor offenses, such as selling CDs (Alton Sterling) or reaching for identification (Philando Castile), have led to fatal outcomes. The excessive use of force, particularly against Black individuals, fundamentally undermines this principle.

Principle 7: The Police Are the Public, and the Public Are the Police

Peel’s Principle: “Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Rather than being seen as part of the community, police often function as an occupying force in Black neighborhoods. The racial composition of many police departments does not reflect the communities they serve, leading to an “us vs. them” mentality. The deployment of military-grade weapons, riot gear, and aggressive policing strategies further separates law enforcement from the people they are meant to serve.

Principle 8: Police Must Not Act as Judge and Jury

Peel’s Principle: “Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Police often operate as judge, jury, and executioner in Black neighborhoods. Many Black individuals never see their day in court because they are killed during police encounters. The presumption of innocence is rarely extended to Black individuals, as officers frequently justify lethal force by claiming they feared for their lives—a defense that seldom holds when white suspects are involved. This blatant violation of Peel’s principle has resulted in a lack of due process and has perpetuated systemic racial injustice.

Principle 9: Police Success Is Measured by the Absence of Crime, Not Visible Force

Peel’s Principle: “The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.”

Reality in Black Communities:
Policing in Black neighborhoods is often evaluated by arrest rates, conviction rates, and aggressive tactics rather than by genuine safety. High incarceration rates do not reflect effective policing; instead, they highlight a system that criminalizes Black lives. Rather than effectively reducing crime through community engagement, social investment, and economic opportunities, the police have prioritized aggressive enforcement, creating a pipeline to prison that fails to tackle the root causes of crime.

Robert Peel’s principles were meant to create a policing system rooted in trust, fairness, and the minimization of force. However, in Black communities, these principles have been systematically violated. The relationship between the police and Black America is one of distrust, fear, and deep-seated injustice.  

If law enforcement is to align with Peel’s ideals, radical reform is essential. Policing must shift from militarization and aggressive enforcement to a model that prioritizes public trust and safety. Officers who breach public trust must be held accountable, ensuring that the law applies equally to all citizens. Community-led policing, where officers are integrated into the neighborhoods they serve rather than functioning as an occupying force, must become the standard, not the exception. Furthermore, meaningful change requires investment in social services, education, and economic opportunities that tackle the root causes of crime rather than criminalizing poverty and racial identity.  

Community empowerment is essential for this transformation. As taxpayers, people fund police departments, covering officers’ salaries, benefits, and resources. This financial authority must translate into genuine influence over policing policies and practices. Communities should demand transparency, participate in police oversight boards, and advocate for reforms that prioritize public safety over aggressive enforcement. Peel’s vision of policing is rooted in the belief that the police are the public, and the public are the police—this means that communities must act to reclaim their rightful role in shaping law enforcement.  

But empowerment doesn’t stop there. People must also exercise the power of their vote. If your police commissioner lacks the guts to reform the culture of your police department, they must be removed—either through elections or by the mayor. If your police commissioner answers to the mayor, and the mayor refuses to hold them accountable, then the mayor must also be voted out. As the saying goes, you get the government you vote for. The authority to shape how your community is policed rests in your hands. True change won’t come from empty promises or symbolic gestures, but from active civic engagement, voter participation, and a steadfast demand for justice. Until these changes are made, Peel’s vision will remain an unfulfilled promise for Black communities—a promise that was never genuinely honored in the first place.

Elevation Nation With Tasha Young With Special Guest Rev. Margaret Coleman

Welcome to the Monday, March 3rd episode of Black Westchester presents Elevation Nation with Tasha Young. Rev. Margaret Coleman is the special guest for this episode, discussing faith and Wellness.

For such a time as this, Faith and wellness in these current times. Tasha, Margaret, and AJ discuss how they have come to know one another, their spirituality, health challenges, and wellness journey, and what Women’s History Month means to them. As well as a 28-day wellness journey. Tasha has lost 20 lbs!! AJ has lost 50 plus!! Check out the conversation on wellness practices and feel free to leave your feedback in the comment section below.

Race For Yonkers City Council President May Be The Most Crowded Race In The County

0

I have been reporting a lot about the crowded City Council Race for three seats in Mount Vernon, but the Yonkers City Council President race may be the county’s most crowded race. Black Westchester is told there could be up to 5 candidates running in the Democratic Primary and up to four candidates running in the Republican Primary for the one seat.

According to our sources, the five Democratic candidates are the following: Current City Council President Lakisha Collins-Bellamy who is Yonkers Democratic nominee, Former City Council President Mike Khader, Former City Council President Chuck Lesnick, City Councilwoman Tasha Diaz (District 3), and Peter Spano (we are told he has no relation to Yonkers Mayor Mike Spano) are all running in the June 24, 2025 Democratic Primary.

The four potential Republican candidates we are told are running are Ron Schutte, Dean Politopolous (Communications person at the Yonkers Police Department and the endorsed candidate), Brandon Neider (Technical Support Specialist at the City of Yonkers), and Ron Matten.

While those are the names you may see vying for your signatures, we will get an official list of candidates when we find out who makes the ballot. Candidates will be collecting signatures between February 25th and April 3rd to make that ballot for the Tuesday, June 24th Primary Election.

Each candidate needs to gather a specific number of valid signatures from Yonkers voters registered in their party to secure a spot on the primary ballot. Even if all the candidates meet the requirements, petition challenges could pop up, which might reduce the number of candidates. The big question is whether anyone will get knocked off for not having enough support. Petition challenges aren’t uncommon in local races, but as long as no candidate faces serious issues, it’s expected to be a very crowded race.

Why are so many people running for this position? Why is this position so important? The City Council President is the presiding officer of the council and leads all meetings and chairs the Rules Committee. Additionally, the council president acts as a city-wide ombudsman (an impartial person who investigates and resolves complaints), responding to individual constituent requests and community concerns. The council president also is a voting member of all standing committees of the council, the Board of Contract and Supply, and the Community Development Agency (CDA). As a member of the CDA, the City Council president actively promotes economic development in the city.

For new residents or New Yorkers turning 18, the deadline to register to vote is June 14th. New Yorkers can register in person at local election offices or online. Early voting for the primary runs from June 14th to 22nd, with Primary Day itself on June 24th.

Winners of both primaries will face off in the General Election. Unlike in the party primaries, party enrollment doesn’t matter as much in the general election. But the rest of the general election timeline does follow similar timing. Mail-in registration applications need to be processed by June 14th for the primary and October 25th for the general election. Voter registration for the November 4th General Election closes on October 25th. Early voting for the general election runs from October 25th to November 2nd.