Home Blog Page 100

UAW President Shawn Fain Backs Trump’s Auto Tariffs to Protect American Jobs

DAMON K JONES
-
0
UAW President Shawn Fain Backs Trump’s Auto Tariffs to Protect American Jobs

The recent announcement of auto tariffs by President Trump has sparked discussions on their potential impact, particularly within the American auto industry. UAW President Shawn Fain, in a conversation with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, addressed the challenges and expectations surrounding these tariffs, especially considering the one-month delay before their implementation on April 2nd.

UAW President Shawn Fain

According to the UAW website, the union has long advocated for fair trade policies that prioritize American jobs and manufacturing. The organization emphasizes the need for government action to prevent outsourcing and strengthen domestic production, aligning with Fain’s stance on the importance of these tariffs.

The Feasibility of Shifting Production

When asked whether automakers would shift production within the one-month period before tariffs take effect, Fain dismissed the idea, stating that it is logistically impossible to shut down a plant and move it in such a short time. However, he emphasized that auto companies are making crucial production decisions right now.

For example, Stellantis has already laid off 2,000 workers at the Warren Truck Plant in Michigan, shifting overflow production of the Ram truck to Mexico. According to Fain, this decision could still be reversed if the company chose to prioritize American jobs. Similarly, John Deere is considering moving a factory to Mexico, while MC Truck workers in Pennsylvania face uncertainty as the company mulls shifting new truck production out of the state.

Fain highlighted that these tariffs should serve as a motivator for companies to prioritize American workers rather than seek cheaper labor overseas.

The Impact of Uncertainty on Companies

The auto industry, like many others, has been dealing with uncertainty regarding tariffs and trade policies. While the Big Three automakers were initially told that tariffs would be implemented, they were later granted an exception. Other industries, such as those dealing with groceries, oil, and fertilizers, also received exemptions. This back-and-forth has left companies scrambling to prepare for possible changes.

Despite this uncertainty, Fain argued that businesses have had sufficient time to plan. He pointed out that ever since the election, discussions about trade policy changes have been ongoing. Companies, therefore, should not be caught off guard.

Worker and Consumer Concerns

One major concern raised about the tariffs is their potential to increase vehicle prices. Critics argue that additional tariffs will force companies to pass costs onto consumers. However, Fain rejected this notion, stating that price hikes are a choice made by corporations, not a necessity.

Drawing a parallel to the UAW’s recent negotiations with the Big Three, Fain noted that automakers claimed the new labor contracts would devastate their businesses. Instead, the contracts resulted in fairer wages for workers while automakers continued making billions in profits and distributing dividends to shareholders.

Fain also pointed to the long-term damage caused by trade agreements such as NAFTA, which led to the closure of approximately 90,000 factories. He stressed that American workers should not be forced to bear the burden of fixing a trade system that has already cost them jobs and stability.

Fain’s Surprising Support for Trump’s Tariffs

One of the more unexpected aspects of the discussion was Fain’s support for Trump’s tariff policies. Despite being a vocal supporter of Vice President Harris during the election and previously referring to Trump as a “scab,” Fain acknowledged that the issue of broken trade laws transcends political affiliations.

While he remains critical of many of Trump’s policies, Fain emphasized that his priority is advocating for American workers. The UAW is prepared to work with the administration to ensure that trade policies benefit the working class, which has suffered due to decades of unfair trade practices.

The implementation of auto tariffs remains a contentious issue, with significant consequences for workers, consumers, and manufacturers. While Fain’s stance may seem surprising to some, his primary focus remains on protecting American jobs and ensuring fair trade policies. Whether these tariffs will effectively encourage domestic production or lead to unintended economic consequences remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the future of the American auto industry is at a critical crossroads.

Ukraine Agrees to U.S.-Brokered 30-Day Ceasefire, Awaiting Russia’s Response

DAMON K JONES
-
0
Ukraine Agrees to U.S.-Brokered 30-Day Ceasefire, Awaiting Russia’s Response

Ukraine has agreed to a 30-day ceasefire proposed by the United States, contingent on Russia’s acceptance, in an effort to temporarily halt hostilities in the ongoing war. The agreement, reached after high-level negotiations between U.S. and Ukrainian officials in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, aims to pause all military operations along the front lines, including missile, drone, and aerial bombardments.

Key Details of the Ceasefire Deal

The ceasefire proposal, which marks one of the most significant diplomatic initiatives in recent months, comes amid increased pressure from the international community to de-escalate the conflict. Unlike previous limited truces that addressed specific types of attacks or regions, this agreement is comprehensive, aiming to create a total cessation of violence across all active combat zones.

As part of the agreement, the United States has announced the immediate resumption of military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, which had previously been suspended. U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed optimism that Russia will also agree to the terms, stating his intention to engage directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia’s Position and International Reactions

Despite Ukraine’s willingness to abide by the ceasefire, Russia has yet to confirm its participation. Initial reactions from Russian officials suggest hesitancy, with indications that the Kremlin may be reluctant to agree to a temporary pause in the fighting. Analysts suggest that Moscow’s decision may depend on assurances regarding Ukraine’s long-term strategic positioning and NATO-related concerns.

The ceasefire proposal has been met with cautious optimism from European leaders. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez have both welcomed the agreement, emphasizing its potential to pave the way for broader peace negotiations. The European Union has called for Russia to join the ceasefire and take steps toward diplomatic engagement.

Economic and Strategic Considerations

Beyond military concerns, the agreement also revives discussions about economic cooperation between the U.S. and Ukraine. The United States has previously sought to secure a stake in Ukraine’s mineral and energy resources in exchange for continued military and financial support. However, Ukraine had previously rejected these proposals, citing the lack of security guarantees and concerns over the extent of U.S. influence in its economic policies.

The Road Ahead

With Ukraine formally committing to the ceasefire, attention now shifts to Moscow’s response. Should Russia agree, the 30-day pause could create an opportunity for more structured peace talks, possibly setting a precedent for a longer-term resolution to the war. However, if Russia declines the deal, it could lead to further escalation and increased strain on U.S.-Ukraine relations.

As the world watches, diplomatic efforts continue to find a path forward in one of the most pressing geopolitical crises of the modern era. The coming days will be crucial in determining whether this ceasefire will serve as a stepping stone toward peace or another fleeting attempt at de-escalation in a prolonged and devastating conflict.

House Passes Budget Bill: No Cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, No Loss of Coverage

DAMON K JONES
-
0
House Passes Budget Bill: No Cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, No Loss of Coverage

We have taken up this task to carefully examine each bill that is claimed to take away Medicaid and Medicare. These programs are essential to millions of Americans, including approximately 92 million Medicaid recipients and 53 million Medicare beneficiaries. Within these numbers, about 18.4 million Black Americans rely on Medicaid, while 7.2 million depend on Medicare for their healthcare needs. The continued fear-mongering surrounding these programs has caused unnecessary anxiety and stress, and we believe it is necessary to set the record straight with the facts.. We know how vital these programs are to seniors and the Black community. The continued fear-mongering is creating so much anxiety and stress that we thought it appropriate to set the record straight on each bill that is claimed to take away someone’s Medicare and Medicaid.

On March 11, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1968 – The Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025. This bill keeps the government open and ensures continued funding for essential programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.

Does This Bill Take Away Medicare or Medicaid?

No. H.R. 1968 does not cut or eliminate Medicare or Medicaid benefits. If you are on these programs, you will continue to receive the same healthcare coverage as before.

What’s in the Bill for Medicare and Medicaid?

  1. Medicare Sequestration Explained:
    • Medicare sequestration is a budget reduction process that automatically cuts payments to healthcare providers, hospitals, and insurance plans to reduce government spending.
    • This does not reduce your Medicare benefits or what is covered, but it lowers the reimbursement rates for doctors and hospitals, which could lead some providers to limit Medicare patients.
    • H.R. 1968 extends sequestration without increasing the percentage of cuts, meaning no new drastic reductions.
  2. Medicaid DSH Payment Reductions Delayed:
    • The planned payment reductions for hospitals that serve Medicaid patients were originally part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), signed into law under President Obama.
    • The ACA by Obama assumed that more Americans would have health insurance, reducing the need for hospitals to provide uncompensated care. As a result, the law included gradual cuts to DSH payments.
    • However, because many states did not expand Medicaid, millions remain uninsured, and hospitals still depend on DSH payments to serve low-income patients.
    • H.R. 1968 delays these cuts until 2028, ensuring that these hospitals can continue to receive funding and provide necessary care to Medicaid patients.
  3. Medicare programs like telehealth services and support for low-income beneficiaries are extended, so patients will continue to have access to care and assistance.

Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries

Hakeem Jeffries’ Misleading Claims

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has claimed that H.R. 1968 slashes Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, but the facts do not support his statements. The bill does not cut or eliminate these programs. Instead, it ensures continued funding for Medicare and Medicaid while delaying previously planned Medicaid DSH cuts from the Obama Affordable Care Act (ACA). Jeffries’ rhetoric, suggesting that Republicans are taking a “chainsaw” to these programs, is political fear-mongering that does not align with the bill’s actual provisions.

There is no way that Jeffries could have read the bill in its entirety before making these claims. He stood on the House floor the same night of the vote and made false accusations about the bill’s content. Are we elected to govern responsibly, or are we elected to grandstand for the cameras without even reading the bills we vote on? This kind of reckless misrepresentation only adds to public anxiety and division. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has claimed that H.R. 1968 slashes Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, but the facts do not support his statements. The bill does not cut or eliminate these programs. Instead, it ensures continued funding for Medicare and Medicaid while delaying previously planned Medicaid DSH cuts from the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Jeffries’ rhetoric, suggesting that Republicans are taking a “chainsaw” to these programs, is political fear-mongering that does not align with the bill’s actual provisions.

There has been a lot of fear-mongering and misinformation about Republicans wanting to take away Medicare and Medicaid. This bill proves that is not happening. The passage of H.R. 1968 ensures that both programs continue without interruption or cuts to benefits.

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer

Following the House’s passage of H.R. 1968—the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025—by a narrow margin of 217 to 213, with only one Democrat voting in favor, the bill now moves to the Senate, where Democrats hold the majority. Senate Democrats, led by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, will determine the bill’s progression, including potential debates, amendments, or votes. Given the lack of bipartisan support in the House, the Senate may propose modifications to the bill to address Democratic concerns. Any amendments made by the Senate would require the bill to return to the House for approval before proceeding to the President for signature. Now, if the government shuts down, it’s on the Democrats.

Bottom Line:

This is not a support for a Republican agenda; this is only in support of the truth. The facts matter, and misrepresenting legislation only fuels unnecessary fear and division.

This bill keeps Medicare and Medicaid running without taking away coverage. Some providers may see small payment adjustments due to sequestration, but the programs themselves remain intact.

If you are a Medicare or Medicaid recipient, you will continue to receive your benefits as usual. This bill ensures stability, not cuts, in government healthcare funding.

For those who still have doubts, read the bill for yourself. Here’s the full text of H.R. 1968 so you can see exactly what’s in it.

House Bill HR 1968 by damonkjones on Scribd

Win or Lose: The Budget Battle That Will Define the Democratic Party

DAMON K JONES
-
0
Win or Lose: The Budget Battle That Will Define the Democratic Party

In a time of increasing political polarization, the Democratic Party has a chance to rise above division and achieve meaningful victories for the American people. To do this, they must prioritize practical governance, economic stability, and policies that support the middle and working class. Rather than being defined solely by resistance, Democrats must offer a clear vision of leadership backed by tangible results.  

Since Trump’s election, we have seen a Democratic political culture that has focused on predicting disaster, resorting to outrage, social media antics, and rhetoric that inadvertently grants Trump the moral high ground—such as after the presidential address to Congress—without presenting a clear strategy to counter the Republican agenda.  

Democrats’ fear-based tactics have proven ineffective, generating only anxiety and grief among the public. These strategies have several limitations. They contribute to polarization by deepening societal divisions and hindering bipartisan cooperation. They have Democrats arguing with Democrats. While fear appeals can capture attention, research shows they do not consistently lead to the desired changes in attitudes or behavior, especially when seen as exaggerated or manipulative. Moreover, personal attacks risk backfiring, as they may foster sympathy for the targeted individuals and alienate undecided or moderate voters. Nevertheless, with the upcoming budget, Democrats can demonstrate their leadership.

While opposing harmful Republican policies is sometimes necessary, Democrats cannot afford to be merely reactive. They must position themselves as proactive problem-solvers, embracing bipartisanship while maintaining a robust, policy-driven approach. Instead of relying solely on ideological opposition, demonstrating effective governance will establish Democrats as the party of action and progress.

Millions of Americans depend on Medicare, Social Security, and SNAP programs. Any Republican efforts to weaken these programs should face strong Democratic opposition. However, instead of just playing defense, Democrats should actively promote proposals to lower the Medicare eligibility age, raise Social Security benefits to match inflation, and enhance food assistance programs for struggling families. They must utilize every legislative tool to ensure these vital programs remain intact and are expanded where necessary.

With the Republican Party deeply divided over the budget, Democrats now have an unprecedented opportunity to shape the outcome. Rather than simply reacting to Republican proposals, they can take charge by demanding key concessions in return for their votes. The GOP’s internal dysfunction grants Democrats the decisive power. This advantage should be leveraged to block harmful cuts, advocate for tax fairness, and secure federal investments in infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Republicans may be fragmented, but Democrats must remain united and strategic. They cannot allow Republican leaders to dictate the terms. By taking control of the negotiation process, Democrats can demonstrate they are the party that delivers tangible results for working Americans.

Further complicating Republican negotiations is the rise of the Freedom Party, a faction of far-right lawmakers who refuse to compromise on significant spending cuts and government downsizing. This wing of the GOP has created further divides within the party, forcing House leadership to navigate a political tightrope. The influence of the Freedom Party has made it nearly impossible for Speaker Mike Johnson to unify his caucus around a single budget proposal. The outcome is a deadlocked Republican Party, where moderates are hesitant to accept extreme cuts while hardliners reject bipartisan agreements. This chaos positions Democrats even more strongly. With Republicans unable to pass a budget bill without outside support, Democrats now have the power to dictate terms, ensuring critical social programs are protected and that economic policies benefit all Americans, not just the wealthiest few.

Representative Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ)

A prime example of this opportunity lies in the growing rifts among House Republicans over Medicaid cuts. About a dozen House Republicans have voiced concerns regarding the proposed $880 billion in Medicaid reductions in their party’s budget plan. Representative Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ) has been outspoken in his opposition, warning that such drastic reductions would disproportionately affect working-class individuals who rely on Medicaid for healthcare. Van Drew has even shared these concerns directly with President Trump, highlighting the inconsistency between the proposed cuts and Trump’s earlier commitments to safeguard Medicaid. This internal strife within the GOP indicates that passing the budget proposal in its current form will be difficult, especially for Republican members representing districts with high Medicaid enrollment. This presents Democrats with a significant opportunity—rather than lamenting Republican policies, they should put on their “big boy” pants and step into negotiations with confidence, understanding that their votes are crucial for any deal to succeed.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries

This presents a crucial opportunity for Democrats. Instead of simply lamenting Republican policies, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries must confidently step up, put on his big boy pants, and engage in negotiations, recognizing that Democratic votes are essential for any deal to pass. This is the essence of American politics—negotiating for the benefit of the people they claim to represent.  

Democrats can avert the “doom and gloom” scenario they have cautioned against. What is lacking is the opportunity, mindset, and willingness to take action.

Negotiation is an art, and now Democrats can master it. Effective negotiators know that power isn’t just about holding a majority; it’s about positioning, strategy, and the ability to secure concessions while maintaining credibility. Republicans, despite controlling the House, are fractured. This creates a unique opportunity for Democrats to take the high ground, positioning themselves as responsible stewards of government who are willing to engage in serious policymaking rather than partisan obstruction. They must communicate clearly to the American people that they are not the ones hindering progress; rather, they are the ones ensuring that essential services and economic stability are protected amid Republican chaos.

The key to successful negotiation is setting firm yet reasonable demands. Democrats should enter discussions with clear objectives: protecting Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and food assistance programs; ensuring tax policies benefit working families over the ultra-wealthy; and preserving critical investments in infrastructure and healthcare. By making these priorities non-negotiable, they force Republicans to the table while demonstrating to voters that they are fighting for their best interests. This strategy not only secures meaningful wins for the people but also exploits the deepening fractures within the Republican Party—particularly as Speaker of the House Mike Johnson struggles to unify his already divided caucus under one tent—positioning Democrats to emerge stronger in the process.

I hope the strategy is not to allow a government shutdown when there is an opportunity to negotiate for the people. If they do, they will be hypocrites to the government workers and services they claim to protect.

While the Republican Party is not fully supportive of the budget, they have the chance to obtain concessions through negotiation. If they do not engage, it will be an opportunity missed—one that could have led to compromises beneficial to both parties and the American people.

To truly win for the American people, Democrats must demonstrate that they are the party of action and results. By negotiating the budget bill from a position of strength, they can secure essential protections for working Americans and ensure the government remains operational despite Republican infighting. Rather than promoting a sense of gloom and doom, Democrats can lead with confidence, optimism, and tangible solutions. Their approach to negotiation will determine whether they are viewed as political opportunists or as the party that stepped up when leadership was crucially needed. Winning elections should not be the primary goal—earning trust, delivering results, and creating a more prosperous future for all Americans must be the ultimate mission.

Westchester County Board of Legislators Joins Fight Against Con Edison’s Proposed Rate Hikes

AJ Woodson
-
0
Westchester County Board of Legislators Joins Fight Against Con Edison’s Proposed Rate Hikes

The Westchester County Board of Legislators has taken decisive action to protect residents against Con Edison’s proposed rate increases. In a unanimous, bipartisan vote on Monday night, the Board agreed to become a party to the major rate case in New York State alongside Westchester County Executive Ken Jenkins. This proactive move highlights the County’s unified commitment to protecting working-class families, seniors, and business owners and safeguarding the availability of affordable electricity and gas for all Westchester residents.

“We are drawing a line in the sand against these excessive rate hikes that would devastate Westchester families and seniors already struggling with rising costs. By joining this rate case, we’re ensuring our residents have a powerful voice at the table where decisions are made,” Board Chairman Vedat Gashi (D- New Castle, Ossining, Somers, Yorktown) said.

The Board’s decision to join the rate case with the County Executive ensures that Westchester’s concerns will remain central throughout the proceedings and amplifies the voices of those who would be directly impacted by these rate hikes. Westchester County leadership is actively fighting for fairness and accountability in defending residents from unjustified utility rate increases.

“Con Edison’s recent submission of a petition to the NYS Public Service Commission requesting authorization to increase gas and electric rates by double digits is unconscionable. By the affirmative Board vote to become a party in this rate case—it gives us a seat at the table and demonstrates our commitment to our constituents to try to keep these increases from continuing to be a burden to the residents of Westchester,” Minority Leader Margaret A. Cunzio (C- North Castle, Mount Pleasant, Pleasantville, Sleepy Hollow, Harrison) said,

Con Edison’s proposed rate hike for 2026 is being reviewed by the New York State Public Service Commission. If approved, rates for residential customers would increase an average electric bill by 11.4% and an average gas bill by 13.3% by 2026, according to Con Edison.

“Hardworking families and small businesses are already struggling with rising costs; rate hikes from Con Edison would only add to that burden. We need to ensure that essential services remain affordable and accessible to all. Tonight’s vote is a strong move in the fight to protect consumers from unfair rate increases that hit them where it hurts the most,” Legislator Colin D. Smith (D- Cortlandt, Peekskill, Yorktown) Chair of the Board’s Legislation Committee, said.

The Public Service Commission will decide on the final rates after a months-long process. County Executive Ken Jenkins, Chairman Vedat Gashi, and other legislators will participate in the Public Service Commission’s online hearing in early April.

“The Public Service Commission should pull the plug on this proposal and demand a plan that actually works for consumers, not just Con Ed’s bottom line. While we all recognize the need for reliable energy and infrastructure improvements, passing excessive costs onto consumers—especially without transparency and accountability—is simply unacceptable,” County Executive Ken Jenkins said.

Stay tuned to Black Westchester, we will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available.

en Español

La Junta de Legisladores del Condado de Westchester ha tomado medidas decisivas para proteger a los residentes contra los aumentos propuestos por Con Edison en las tarifas de electricidad y gas. En una votación unánime y bipartidista el lunes por la noche, la Junta acordó formar parte del caso principal sobre tarifas en el Estado de Nueva York, junto con el Ejecutivo del Condado de Westchester, Ken Jenkins. Este movimiento proactivo resalta el compromiso unificado del Condado para proteger a las familias trabajadoras, a los adultos mayores y a los dueños de negocios, garantizando la disponibilidad de electricidad y gas a precios asequibles para todos los residentes de Westchester.

La decisión de la Junta de unirse al caso sobre tarifas con el Ejecutivo del Condado asegura que las preocupaciones de Westchester seguirán siendo el foco central del proceso y amplifica las voces de aquellos que se verían directamente afectados por estos aumentos. El liderazgo del Condado de Westchester está luchando activamente por la equidad y la rendición de cuentas para defender a los residentes de incrementos injustificados en las tarifas de los servicios públicos.

El aumento de tarifas propuesto por Con Edison para 2026 está siendo revisado por la Comisión de Servicios Públicos del Estado de Nueva York. Si se aprueba, las tarifas para clientes residenciales aumentarían en un 11.4 % en las facturas de electricidad y en un 13.3 % en las facturas de gas para 2026, según Con Edison. La Comisión de Servicios Públicos tomará una decisión final sobre las tarifas después de un proceso de varios meses. El Ejecutivo del Condado, Ken Jenkins, el Presidente Vedat Gashi y otros legisladores participarán en la audiencia en línea de la Comisión de Servicios Públicos a principios de Abril.

Continuaremos proporcionando actualizaciones a medida que haya más información disponible.

Civility Should Not Silence Accountability By dr. haley pilgrim

Black Westchester
-
1
Civility Should Not Silence Accountability By dr. haley pilgrim

Black resistance is an integral part of US history. Black people have an extensive history of fighting against systems of white supremacy. Representative Al Green continued this legacy at President Trump’s address to Congress.

Representative George Latimer called this protest “inappropriate,” illustrating two concerning trends for Democrats: a lack of willingness to fight for justice in a meaningful way and using decorum to suppress valid dissent against an increasingly authoritarian regime.

“When a president—my president, your president—is speaking, we don’t interrupt, we don’t pull those stunts,” Latimer told Axios. Referring to Green’s act of resistance as a “stunt” is trivializing at best and dangerous at worst. Latimer recommends that lawmakers sit in quiet reverence to someone threatening democracy rather than use their platform to hold those in power accountable.

This is not about respecting the presidency; it’s about refusing to place decorum over the lives of humans. Green’s interruption wasn’t a “stunt” but a demand for answers on policies that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. A white congressman chastising a Black colleague for protesting policies that harm communities of color represents a long history of silencing dissenting voices from underrepresented groups. Black folks know all too well that calling for civility is a way to silence people of color, maintain the status quo that excludes us, and dismiss necessary demands for justice. 

Throughout history, all forms of disruptive actions were deemed “inappropriate” at that time. Without these forms of protests, we would not have had the Civil Rights Movement, gotten women the right to vote, or won the five-day work week. Disruptions have always been pivotal to changing unjust systems. 

Al Green’s actions remind me of the biblical story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego (Daniel 3:23-26). These men were asked to kneel before a King’s golden idol but refused; subsequently, being thrown into a fiery furnace as punishment. Their defiance was not about being “disrespectful to the president” but about standing firm in their convictions against an unjust command. Similarly, Representative Green’s refusal to kneel to oppressive policies parallels this act of faith and courage—electing to brave the fire rather than negotiate on what is right.

Democracy is under threat, and Democrats can not afford any more passivity. The party needs fighters. The party needs leaders who are willing to stand up against the face oppression and actively disrupt the injustices going on. This time calls for leaders who dare to resist, not those who shrink in the name of politeness and formalities. In the pursuit of a more equitable society, true civility lies not in the absence of disruption but in the presence of justice.

About the author: Dr. haley pilgrim is a sociologist, corporate strategist, and activist. A Ph.D. graduate from the University of Pennsylvania, she has deep expertise in inequality and intersectionality. She is currently a board member for the Boys and Girls Club of Mount Vernon, Mount Vernon’s Charter Review Commission, and the Westchester Black Women’s Political Caucus. With a track record of driving change across sectors, dr. pilgrim is dedicated to advancing equity, transparency, and strong governance.

PBP Radio – Sunday, March 9, 2025

AJ Woodson
-
0
PBP Radio – Sunday, March 9, 2025

Welcome to another powerful episode of Black Westchester presents The People Before Politics Radio Show, where we bring you important news from a Black perspective that mainstream media won’t cover and give you that Real Talk For The Community.

People Before Politics Radio, Giving You Real Talk For The Community Since 2014!

Black Westchester presents the People Before Politics Radio Show every Sunday night, 6-8 PM, simulcasting live on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube and archived on BlackWestchester.com. Giving you that Real Talk For The Community since 2014.

To support the Black Westchester and the People Before Politics Radio Show, which provides the News With The Black Point Of view and gives you the real talk for the community for free, make a donation via PayPal at www.PayPal.me/BlackWestchesterMag. In the words of Ray Charles, “One of these days, and it [might not be] long, You’re gonna look for [us], and [we’ll] be gone.” Support independent, Black-free media!

Subscribe, hit the notification bell, and join the conversation this Sunday. At Black Westchester, we always put People Before Politics!

As always, you can follow us on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube

Contributions and Donations can be made via PayPal.

PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE! HELP US SPREAD INDEPENDENT NEWS!!!

Grace Baptist Church HBCU Weekend

Cynthia Turnquest-Jones
-
0
Grace Baptist Church HBCU Weekend

The Grace HBCU Weekend 2025 college fair commenced on Saturday, February 22, 2025, featuring representatives from Benedict College, Clarke Atlanta University, Cheney University, the University of Pennsylvania, Florida A&T University, Hampton University, Howard University, Jackson State University, Lincoln University, Morgan State University, Morehouse College, Norfolk State University, North Carolina AT&T, Oakwood University, Spellman College, Tuskegee University, the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, Virginia University, and Xavier University.

The primary objective of an HBCU fair is to provide students and families with information regarding Historically Black Colleges and Universities. The Grace Baptist Church HBCU Weekend 2025 serves as a valuable resource for students, assisting them in navigating the college admission process and exploring financial aid and scholarship opportunities. Students have the opportunity to engage in conversations with HBCU representatives and gain insights into campus life, academic programs, and financial aid assistance.

Grace Baptist Church, located at 52 South 6th Avenue in Mount Vernon, has established a dedicated room that simulates a college dormitory, providing students with an immersive experience that allows them to envision their future living arrangements within a college environment. This unique feature has garnered significant student appreciation as it offers a tangible connection to the college life experience.

A marching band comprised of Mount Vernon City School District students entertained attendees throughout the weekend, showcasing HBCU entertainment options.

The event will conclude on Sunday, February 23, 2025, with a Grace Baptist Church service commencing at 11:00 AM. Attendees were encouraged to wear their college attire, including T-shirts, sweatshirts, and sorority or fraternity regalia.

Thank you to Senior Pastor, Dr. W. Franklyn Richardson, for the vision and ther Grace Baptist Church HBCU Weekend Committee!

Jordan Mendez, 16-Year-Old Yonkers Activist Expresses Concerns About Recent Acts Of Violence

AJ Woodson
-
2
Jordan Mendez, 16-Year-Old Yonkers Activist Expresses Concerns About Recent Acts Of Violence

Yonkers has undergone its third shooting in three days. Weeks before that, relatively close to where I live, there was a stabbing inside a pizzeria that took the lives of two teenagers. Years before that, on the same street as the pizzeria, a teenage girl was shot dead while trying to help her sister with a school project. I could continue reciting tragedies dating back to my time in kindergarten but I think I’ve made my point that the youth of Yonkers have an inseparable relationship with the violence in their community; that is, our memories, our childhood, our identity has been marked by the tragedies of our community in such a way that we can’t define our childhood or teenage experience apart from the violence we were exposed to. 

In such instances, this exposure to violence, this impression from violence, influences the psyche as it weaves itself into the culture of the Yonkers youth and their daily lives. 

For example, you’ve heard of or experienced firsthand the effects of street crowding, traffic, and car pollution. Many young people may prefer calling an Uber or driving to a place that’s well within walking distance because they feel unsafe passing through certain neighborhoods. It’s evident that the streets would crowd when the sidewalks are unsafe. For this reason, carbon emissions are rising, air quality is declining, and a 5 minute drive may now take 20. 

For example, you’ve seen an increase of youth illegally possessing weapons. Many young people find themselves in need of greater protection from their increasingly dangerous environments. The police won’t help them—they’re not designed to. The police are things of the state, their job isn’t to do the right thing as much as it is to uphold the law. Fortunately, the right thing and the law often overlap, but most scared, defensively weapon possessing, youth understand that unless a rebellious wave of magnanimity possesses the officer, they’ll be subject to the same force of punishment as their perpetrator of endangerment. In such nuanced cases as this, a child possessing a weapon for their own safety may feel estranged from the cops as they think their own comfort is criminal. And, following this reasoning, naturally, they’ll take it upon themselves and their weapon to handle any hostilities or interactions in which they feel threatened. In essence, the instability of their environment places enmity between the youth and their neighbors, and such unexamined hostilities evolve into a psychology of “Me vs You” and a cycle of preemptive violence. 

For example, you’ve noticed how the music that young people are listening to is increasingly coarse and crude and vulgar and violent. Many adults make the mistake of attributing the youth’s violence problems to the music that they listen to. Such an assessment can only be made with an ill-informed understanding of art. Art is a reflection of the artist, a revelation of the reality that the artist is subject to. Art itself cannot be the source of the problem so much as it may be the articulation of the problem, the expression of the problem, the translation of the problem, or even, perhaps, the exacerbation of the problem. Do you want to change the art the youth consume? Change the reality in which they live! But regardless, the presence of violence will continue to manifest itself in the leisure of the youth so long as it is present in the time during which they’d blossom. 

I’ve given you three examples of the distinct ways in which a violent culture fruits a violent youth. Our youth have suffered far too long under the inadequacies and incompetence of their government hitherto. They have become casualties in the war against the enduring effects of racism and martyrs in the ongoing liberation struggle. For, to “mártys”—assuming the word martyr’s Greek origin—is to witness, and the Yonkers youth has bore witness to the historical violence against their people and assumed the culture imposed upon them perfectly, as any child would. 

They are not to blame. I hope you know that. And I hope your solution wasn’t to increase policing in our struggling neighborhoods since that’s obviously going to cost government funding that could be going toward more sustainable, empathetic, and generally humane solutions. These children are victims, and in their victimhood, they became perpetrators of injustice. I implore you show mercy to the kids who have done wrong because wrong is only done when an individual has an ill informed morality, making it the responsibility of the society to educate them, or if they don’t care about how doing wrong will affect them, in which case they are self harming and need help rehabilitating. 

All that being said, it’s time I introduce to you what I’ve reasoned may sustainably combat and permanently reduce violent crime in the youth of Yonkers. 

First, for the youth who have already committed acts of violence, they should not be imprisoned. If you want a comprehensive understanding of how imprisonment does not help reduce youth violence but can actually exacerbate the issue or humiliate and dehumanize the perpetrator, I suggest reading Are Prisons Obsolete by Angela Davis and Policing the Black Man, edited by Angela Davis. My point here is clear: Yonkers citizens do not want their city to leave the youth to become wretches or to punish the youth for following the moral example that the city has laid out for them. We’re living in biblical times, y’all. I’m telling you to forgive them for they know not what they’ve done. And if it needs to be through legislation or an upending of imprisonment programs, I ask you to care about the soul of the young people first and foremost.

In this coming budgeting season, see if there’s a way to begin establishing an alternative for imprisonment for the corrupted youth and, once established, fight to make that program the standard as opposed to imprisonment. Also, on a related note, there should be a bill passed saying that if a youth is carrying a firearm or a knife but they feel endangered and they don’t want to use their weapon and they need the help of the police, the endangered youth cannot be prosecuted for their possession of the weapon if they called 911 to intervene in the altercation. Akin to how the Good Samaritan Law protects youth when underage substance consumption is involved and how the NYS Department of Health states, “Nothing should stop you from calling 911 in a life-or-death situation.” Such a protection would only strengthen the bond that youth have with their local police, making Yonkers far safer.

Second, which is the most important point I’ll make in this message, for far too long, you have taken a passive approach to preventing gun violence, and there needs to be a more active approach… through the schools. I’m a big fan of Snug, trust me. I’m a S.I.C. Shooter always, 

I believe in the efforts of Hezues R, the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, the Glocs-4-Ocs program, the whole 9. But there needs to be more. With such instances as this, it’s imperative that we address these issues primarily and immediately. We mustn’t rely on extracurricular activities alone to stop gun violence, we mustn’t believe that gun violence can be combated by asking “gang bangers” on a megaphone, outside of a former shooting site, to put down their guns and sing Kumbaya. We must address this issue for what it is. This is an issue of poverty, inopportune circumstances and bad education. This isn’t to undermine, invalidate, or discredit any of the powerful and impactful efforts that Gun Violence Prevention programs have been enacting thus far. This is to bring to light to the fact that the government needs to take a more active approach in bringing this battle to the ruins in which this war first begins, the classroom. Of course, these kids won’t think straight if they aren’t eating at home and are eating unhealthy food in school. Of course, these kids will carry guns and knives and not pepper spray; guns and knives are all they know. Of course, these kids are gonna start robbing, trapping, and scamming! I’m 16, if you destabilized my household and I had to watch my mother, my world, struggle, I couldn’t tell you that I wouldn’t be out there selling ounces. There is an opportunity deficit in the Yonkers community that starts in the minds of the youth.

To break that barrier and get them to see the alternatives, meet them where they are: the classroom. I need a Snug representative in every school the same way there are guidance counselors. I need you to help Hezues bring Glocs-4-Ocs to the schools so any student who’s carrying a weapon in school—gun, knife, whatever lethal weapon—has an incentive to turn a new leaf on campus! We need a day in the city dedicated to ending gun violence: a Gun Violence Prevention Day, where, annually, students in grades 5-12 are given a lecture in their auditorium about the dangers of gun violence, the psychology of the juvenile, and the resources that the city has to help them if they’re considering going down that path. And have police there! Have them speak! Let’s put an end to the distrust that many youth feel towards the police. Let’s support families. Let’s build communities. Let’s agree that our children are our world and unite in the fight for justice and breaking generational trauma.

And on that note, this cooperation with our public schools needs to be in this year’s budget. Let me be frank for a second and speak to you all like adults. I’m aware we’re an underfunded bunch. I used to go to Albany every year to ask for more funding. But this isn’t the time to talk dollars. There was a time for conversation. A time when we can play semantics like tennis and bounce ideas off of each other amidst a round table discussion. A time when we can leisure ourselves about this topic and converse over potential solutions while sipping our double cappuccino macchiatos. But that time has passed. This is a time of urgency. A time of action. It is not just supererogatory to organize against gun violence, it’s obligatory. Children are dying. Plain and simple. Honestly, I don’t give a **** what kind of money you have to move around to make this happen. I don’t care what department needs to take the cut. Take the cut out of your paycheck if you need to. Matter of fact, take it out of mine too! In the words of William Wordsworth, “the child is the father of man.” Nothing should be more important than supporting our children. All other matters are but dust, and to dust they shall return. They’re nothing in comparison to the fathers of the future, and so we should bow our heads and genuflect in modesty before these beacons of hope as we pour forth our all into them to ensure they become right and just. Let every one of us suffer so they may never again. 

Thirdly, and lastly, support me. Support me and other organizations trying to create alternative directions for our Yonkers youth. My organization is hosting an Annual Summer Sports Giveaway to provide sports equipment to youth who need it. The Moxie Project has been gracefully supported by the Yonkers High School Advancement Club for our first year, 2024. In light of recent events we’re thinking of sponsoring buildings in underserved neighborhoods to have a more direct and immediate impact on the communities who are most vulnerable. I’m an upcoming organization focused on the youth so helping me in helping the community will ultimately expedite the rate at which we reach our mutual goal of serving our people. 

To close, I’d like to draw attention to our American heritage and traditional American values. We are a republic, and republic comes from the Latin “rēs pūblica,” roughly translating to “the public thing” or, as I like to call it, “thing of the people.” Let us all, may we be activists, laborers, philanthropists, or politicians, deny ourselves, assume our responsibilities, and follow the path to righteousness. Let us do the best we can for our children, and let me remind you that investing in the disenfranchised, the victims, and the future is the responsibility of the strong and is not just morally upstanding but patriotic. If you care for our American heritage and the future of our nation, taking my advice is intuitive. And in the words of Aimé Césaire: 

“A civilization that proves incapable of solving the problems it creates is a decadent civilization. A civilization that chooses to close its eyes to its most crucial problems is a sick civilization. A civilization that plays fast and loose with its principles is a dying civilization.” 

Let us not be decadent. Let us not go blind. Let us thrive and not merely survive but flourish by paving the way for our children to become stronger than we could ever be. 

Authentically,
Your favorite 16-year-old activist,
Jordan Alexander Bond-Mendez

Tragedy in Newark: 14-Year-Old Suspect Charged in Fatal Police Shooting

DAMON K JONES
-
0
Tragedy in Newark: 14-Year-Old Suspect Charged in Fatal Police Shooting

Newark, NJ – March 8, 2025 – A community is in mourning following a tragic shooting in Newark, New Jersey, where a 14-year-old boy allegedly shot and killed a police officer and wounded another. The shocking incident has raised concerns about youth violence and illegal firearms in urban communities.

Incident Details

The shooting occurred on the evening of March 7, when officers from the Newark Police Department were investigating illegal firearms activity near Broadway and Carteret Street. Detective Joseph Azcona, a 26-year-old officer with five years of service, was fatally shot before he could even exit his vehicle. Another officer, whose name has not been released, was also struck but survived with non-life-threatening injuries.

Authorities reported that the 14-year-old suspect was also wounded during the confrontation and is currently receiving medical treatment. He has been charged with multiple offenses, including murder, attempted murder, and illegal possession of a firearm.

Eyewitness Accounts and Community Reactions

Witnesses described the scene as chaotic, with officers rushing toward the suspect before a series of gunshots erupted. Residents expressed their shock and sorrow over the violent turn of events. One bystander, Randy Mejia, recalled hearing loud bangs, initially mistaking them for a car crash before realizing it was gunfire.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka addressed the tragedy, emphasizing the need for stronger community and family involvement in preventing youth violence. “This is not just about policing; it’s about our families, our children, and ensuring they don’t have access to firearms or get involved in situations like this,” Baraka stated.

Law Enforcement and Political Responses

Law enforcement agencies across the state have expressed their condolences to Azcona’s family and colleagues. The Newark Police Department called his death a devastating loss, describing him as a dedicated officer who put his life on the line to protect the community.

Governor Phil Murphy also released a statement, condemning the violence and vowing to continue efforts to address gun violence, particularly among young individuals. “A 14-year-old should never have access to a firearm. We must work together to stop these tragedies from happening,” Murphy said.

Ongoing Investigation and Legal Proceedings

As the investigation continues, authorities are looking into how the teenager obtained the weapon. Prosecutors have indicated that they will seek to charge him as an adult, given the severity of the crime.

The incident has reignited debates on gun control and juvenile crime, with activists calling for stronger measures to prevent young individuals from obtaining firearms. Others emphasize the need for increased investment in mentorship and community programs to steer youth away from violence.

Conclusion

The death of Detective Joseph Azcona has left a deep scar on the Newark community and beyond. His bravery and service will not be forgotten, while the circumstances of this tragedy serve as a harsh reminder of the urgent need to address gun violence and youth crime in America

1...99100101...184Page 100 of 184