Welcome to the March 2025 Women’s History Month digital edition of Black Westchester Newspaper
Trump’s Political Chess Move: How One Tweet Gaslit the Democratic Party
In American politics, perception is often more potent than policy. No one understands this better than Donald J. Trump. The former—and now current—president has long mastered the art of political gamesmanship, and his latest maneuver, a simple “thank you” tweet to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, was a masterstroke in political deception. In that one tweet, Trump ignited a firestorm within the Democratic Party, exposing their internal divisions and forcing them into a political civil war while he sat back and watched.
I am a student of strategies and the art of negotiation. Whether business, personal, or political, there is always an offer and a negotiation. As the song says, we must mature and recognize when to fold, hold, and walk away.
This is not about supporting Trump. This is about recognizing the tactical political move of a politician who learned from his past mistakes and executed a move that blindsided his opposition. To understand the brilliance of this maneuver, we must look back at Trump’s last major shutdown battle and its consequences
2018-2019: The Shutdown That Cost Republicans Everything
During Trump’s first term, he never shied away from the spotlight. His presidency was marked by a hands-on, in-your-face approach, mainly regarding battles with Democrats. Nowhere was this more evident than during the 2018-2019 government shutdown, the longest in U.S. history at 35 days.
The shutdown stemmed from a bitter dispute over Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion to fund his U.S.-Mexico border wall. Democrats, fresh off a victory in the 2018 midterms where they reclaimed control of the House, refused to budge. The government stopped, and 800,000 federal workers went unpaid—TSA agents, IRS workers, and even Coast Guard members struggled to make ends meet. National parks became trash heaps, food safety inspections stopped, and airline security risks grew.
Most damaging of all? Trump took the blame.
Instead of allowing the shutdown to unfold naturally and pinning the blame on Congress, Trump proudly declared in a public meeting with Chuck Schumer and Nanci Pelosi that he would take responsibility for it. The media relentlessly replayed that clip. Polls showed that most Americans held Trump responsible for the shutdown, not Democrats.
This mistake had massive political consequences. Republicans lost the House in 2018, the Senate in 2020, and Trump lost the White House. His public involvement in the shutdown played a direct role in that downfall. He learned a hard lesson: taking the spotlight in a government shutdown is a losing strategy.
2024: Trump’s Tactical Retreat
Fast-forward to today. Another government shutdown loomed. But this time, Trump stayed silent. There were no public threats, no “proud” declarations, and no dominating the media cycle. Instead, he allowed the legislative process to unfold naturally. Republicans in Congress handled the negotiations; House Speaker Mike Johnson was the frontman, while Trump remained a shadow figure, avoiding blame entirely.
Then came the moment no one saw coming. Chuck Schumer and other Democrats, in a surprising move, voted for a Republican-led spending bill to avert the shutdown. That’s when Trump struck. He didn’t attack Schumer. He didn’t gloat. Instead, he thanked him. Progressive Democrats were furious. Some even called for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to primary Schumer.
The reaction was immediate. Progressive Democrats turned on Schumer, accusing him of caving to Republicans. The left fractured before the public’s eyes. Trump had manipulated the narrative masterfully—without even making a demand. His one tweet gaslit the Democrats into eating themselves alive.
Schumer and other Democrats were now forced to defend why they voted for a Republican bill instead of attacking the GOP. Progressive activists were enraged. The left was fighting itself instead of Trump. And he had done it all without stepping into the political battlefield.
A Political Masterstroke That Democrats Never Saw Coming
This was not about the policy behind the shutdown or whether the spending bill was good or bad. It was about the game of politics, and Trump played it to perfection. He learned from his mistakes, executed a patient strategy, and let Democrats implode without lifting a finger.
The Democratic Party has long underestimated Trump’s ability to control the narrative. In 2018, they had him on the ropes because he was too loud. In 2025, he let them punch themselves out, then delivered the finishing blow with a simple tweet.
Another lesson here is the danger of prejudgment. When we assume someone will act the same way as before, we miss subtle changes. It’s like a fighter training for a bout against a southpaw, only to realize in the ring that his opponent is orthodox. His entire strategy is now useless. The Democrats expected Trump to fight the same battle he lost before, but this time, he switched stances—and they never saw it coming.
If Democrats don’t recognize what happened, they are in serious trouble heading to 2028. Politics is war, and Trump won this battle without appearing on the battlefield. That’s how the game is played.
Avocados: A Nutritional Ally for Black Americans Combating Chronic Disease
Black Americans face disproportionately high rates of chronic diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension. This disparity stems from systemic health inequities, limited access to nutritious foods, and cultural dietary patterns influenced by historical injustices. However, incorporating nutrient-dense foods like avocados into daily diets can be a simple yet effective strategy to improve health outcomes.
Statistics reveal concerning trends. Heart disease remains the leading cause of death among Black Americans. Hypertension affects nearly 56 percent of Black adults, surpassing the 48 percent observed in White adults. Diabetes prevalence is approximately 60 percent higher in Black Americans compared to their White counterparts. Obesity rates are notably higher within the Black community, further exacerbating these chronic conditions. While factors such as healthcare access and genetics contribute to these disparities, diet plays a pivotal role. Traditional soul food, though culturally significant, often contains high levels of saturated fats, sodium, and processed ingredients. Embracing nutrient-rich foods like avocados can help mitigate these health risks.
Avocados are more than just a trendy food item; they are rich in monounsaturated fats, fiber, vitamins, and minerals, offering numerous health benefits. Their heart-healthy fats help lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol while maintaining high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, thereby reducing the risk of heart disease. Additionally, avocados contain high amounts of potassium, which plays a crucial role in regulating blood pressure—an issue that disproportionately affects the Black community.
For individuals at risk of or managing diabetes, avocados serve as an excellent dietary choice due to their low glycemic index. Unlike processed carbohydrates, avocados do not cause rapid blood sugar spikes. The combination of fiber and healthy fats aids in stabilizing blood sugar levels, making them beneficial for those dealing with insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes.
Weight management remains a pressing concern in the Black community, where high-calorie, low-nutrient foods often dominate dietary choices. Avocados, packed with fiber and healthy fats, promote satiety and help curb cravings. Research indicates that individuals who consume avocados frequently tend to have lower body mass indexes and healthier metabolic functions. Including avocados in meals, such as replacing processed snacks with guacamole or avocado toast on whole-grain bread, can support weight loss and overall well-being.
Mental health is another area where avocados offer significant benefits. Anxiety, depression, and cognitive decline are often overlooked in discussions about Black health. Avocados contain essential B vitamins and omega-3 fatty acids, which play a role in brain function and emotional well-being. Consuming nutrient-dense foods that support mental clarity and reduce stress can be an essential aspect of holistic health. Since chronic stress is known to worsen conditions like hypertension and heart disease, incorporating foods that help balance mood and cognitive function is a small yet impactful way to improve health outcomes.
Despite these benefits, fresh and nutritious foods like avocados remain inaccessible to many Black Americans due to the prevalence of food deserts—neighborhoods where grocery stores with fresh produce are scarce, while fast-food chains and convenience stores are abundant. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach. Community initiatives such as urban farming and local gardens can provide access to fresh produce. Nutrition education, particularly in schools, churches, and community organizations, can raise awareness about the importance of avocados and other nutrient-rich foods in preventing chronic diseases. Affordability is another concern, but avocados can be more accessible when purchased in bulk or from discount retailers. Investing in healthier food choices can ultimately reduce long-term healthcare costs by preventing diet-related illnesses.
Integrating avocados into culturally significant dishes is one way to make them more appealing and sustainable within the Black community. Avocado can be incorporated into traditional salads, added to jerk-spiced grilled chicken dishes, or blended into smoothies for a nutritious breakfast option. Small changes like these allow for the preservation of cultural heritage while enhancing the nutritional value of meals.
The health challenges facing Black Americans are complex and multifaceted, but incorporating nutrient-dense foods like avocados into daily diets is a practical step toward improving health outcomes. By embracing dietary changes alongside traditional cultural practices, the Black community can work toward reducing the prevalence of chronic diseases and enhancing overall well-being.
Disclaimer:
This article is for informational purposes only and does not substitute professional medical advice. Consult with a healthcare provider before making significant dietary changes.
Sources:
Medical News Today: “12 Health Benefits of Avocado” (medicalnewstoday.com)
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health: “Avocados – The Nutrition Source” (nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu)
National Library of Medicine: “Avocado Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults” (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Food Revolution Network: “Holy Guacamole! The Surprising Health Benefits of Avocados” (foodrevolution.org)
The Times are Not “Uncertain”
It’s time for us to stop calling these “uncertain times.”
In truth, we can all be “certain” we know exactly what we are up against. From economic inequality to the erosion of trust in our institutions, the challenges we face as a society are not abstract fears or distant possibilities. These are real, tangible issues that demand our attention.
When we continue to describe our times as “uncertain,” we unintentionally give away our power, as if we are waiting for a storm to pass before we can act. But, in truth, the clarity we need is already here, staring us in the face. We see it in the growing divides between rich and poor, in the struggles of marginalized communities, and in the increasing polarization of our politics.
The times are “certain” because the problems are clear, we can no longer afford to wait for ideal conditions to address them. Our task is to recognize that certainty brings responsibility to act, to collaborate, and to create the change our society desperately needs.
When we frame our times as uncertain, we risk paralyzing ourselves into inaction. We know the shape of the challenges ahead: the growing inequality, the lack of access to quality education and healthcare, and the fracturing of social trust. What is uncertain is not the nature of our challenges, but whether we will choose to confront them with the courage, urgency, and unity they require.
Look around. We have the resources, creativity, and collective strength to create real, transformative change. History has shown us that when we come together across differences, ideologies, and boundaries, we can overcome even the greatest of obstacles. When we unite for the common good, no problem is too big, and no challenge is too insurmountable.
No single person, organization, or level of government can tackle these issues alone but we all have to do our part. Our power lies in collaboration, solidarity, and shared commitment to a brighter future. We need to listen to one another, work together, and lead with empathy. Only then can we build a society that values equity, justice, and opportunity for all.
Let’s embrace the “certainty” of the path before us. The work is hard and may take time, but the alternative is a future where division and distrust continue to deepen. We CAN restore trust in our institutions. We CAN ensure that future generations inherit a society that offers opportunity and dignity for all. We CAN be the change we need to see in the world.
We have no more excuses for inaction.
Emmanuel D Rawlings
Simone Biles: Balancing Bravery and Breaking Barriers in Mental Health by Dr. Derek Suite
Like Black History Month, Women’s History Month offers the opportunity to reflect on the invaluable
role women play in shaping the course of humanity and world history. Starting with basic genetics and
biology, all human beings are incubated by and birthed through the female reproductive system, and
every human being must inherit an X chromosome from their mother to exist. Let that sink in for a second. Women not only contribute to our very existence but to our continuance as a species as well.
From politics (i.e., Cleopatra), to writers (i.e., Harriett Beecher Stowe), to scientists (i.e., Madame Curie),
to activists (i.e., Rosa Parks), women have had to be resilient and resourceful, often excelling and
achieving despite the hurdles they encounter. Navigating work-life balance, gender pay gaps, lack of
equal opportunity, pregnancy discrimination, sexual harassment, institutional barriers, and unconscious
bias are just a few of the everyday hurdles women navigate. Despite these obstacles, women have a
demonstrated history of bravely breaking through barriers to spearhead issues that affect society at large. Simone Biles is a modern-day example of how this legacy of courage is forged.
A remarkable young woman, widely regarded as the greatest gymnast of her era, Simone Biles shocked
the world by choosing to withdraw from competition during the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Compounding the
shock, Simone shared that her decision was based on a mental health concern, which made headlines
around the world. Simone was also transparent about the factors that affected her emotionally, including
processing the Covid 19 pandemic, being away from the support of family, and the years of traumatic
sexual abuse she suffered during her time with USA Gymnastics.
As a sports psychiatrist who works with elite athletes across multiple sports, I understand the immense
fortitude it took for Simone, considered the greatest gymnast of all time; with multiple Olympic and
world championship medals; who had sacrificed and trained for 5 years to prepare to compete in the
Olympics; to make the courageous decision to step down based on a “mental health” issue–and then to share it publicly. For Simone to also share her journey as a survivor of sexual abuse required additional mettle. Simone admitted that she felt trepidation and expected a backlash after deciding to admit her mental health issues on the world stage.
And she had good reason to worry.
Though the mental health landscape in professional sports is evolving, many athletes and organizations
still grapple with the stigma associated with mental illness. In traditional, alpha-dominant sports settings
that privilege self-sufficiency, invulnerability, and mental toughness, mental health issues are not
typically discussed or endorsed. Accordingly, many athletes are reluctant to admit when they need mental or emotional support. The last thing they want is to be thought of as “crazy,” be perceived as weak, or be considered as a liability to the team. The result? Many athletes suffer in silence, with some relying on unhealthy habits, or substance use to get them through grueling training, performance, and travel demands.
By publicly stating that she was prioritizing her mental health, Simone broke through the traditional
barriers within sports culture that preclude public discussions about athletes’ mental health. Her
transparency opened a worldwide dialogue on the subject. Her status and success combined with her candor around her struggles helped destigmatize mental illness for many and signaled that asking for help was a sign of strength—not weakness. In so doing, she paved the way for other athletes and sports
organizations to openly discuss the importance of mental health in sports culture.
Simone’s decision to take some time off after the 2020 Olympics to prioritize her mental health, despite
her own fears and the public scrutiny, was based on her steadfast commitment to her self-care and
emotional well-being. Though quickly labeled a mental health advocate in the press, Simone readily
admitted that she initially did not see herself as an advocate, in the traditional sense, because she was “not an expert” in mental health matters. Rather, she wanted to share her journey with the hope that it might empower other athletes who struggle with mental health conditions. To this end, Simone has openly shared her self-care strategies, which included seeking professional counseling, using mental health apps, taking strategic breaks from social media, spending time with her emotional support networks, and becoming actively involved in community service.
Simone’s journey offers a living roadmap to a unique resilience strategy that hinges on maintaining
a fierce competitive spirit while embracing vulnerability. In 2023, the world saw her resilience in action.
Returning to the professional arena at the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in Belgium, Simone not only excelled in competition but won multiple gold medals. Her steadfast determination and extraordinary courage continue to inspire the world and honor the trailblazing legacy of remarkable women in the history of sports.
We look forward to seeing Simone display her indomitable spirit and legendary talents once more at the
53rd FIG Artistic Gymnastics World Championships in Jakarta, Indonesia, scheduled for October 2025.
About The Author: Derek H. Suite, M.D., M.S. is a leading sports psychiatrist, board-certified through the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, and an Assistant Professor at Columbia University. He is the founder and executive chairman of Full Circle Confidential which provides expert consultation to multiple iconic sports franchises. He is the host of the motivational Suite Spot Podcast.
New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams Attempts To Make History As NYC’s First Female Mayor
If victorious Adrienne Adams would make history as the first woman to be elected mayor of New York City
In March 2025, term-limited New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams announced she is challenging incumbent Mayor Eric Adams (no relations) in the 2025 NYC mayoral election. She declared her candidacy at the urging of many New York elected officials, most notably Attorney General Letitia James and Public Advocate Jumaane Williams.
“I never planned to run for mayor, but I’m not giving up on New York City. Our city deserves a leader who serves its people first and always, not someone focused on themselves and their own political interests,” said Speaker Adams. “I’m a public servant, mother, Queens girl, and I’m running for mayor. No drama, no nonsense — just my commitment to leading with competence and integrity.”
Her rather late and unexpected entry into the mayoral contest is similar to her underdog and eventually successful bid for City Council speaker in 2021. In that case, she was a popular and respected consensus choice who didn’t get any traction until the very end of the tumultuous race.
Adams is no stranger to making history. Elected in January 2022 by her colleagues, she leads the most diverse and the first women-majority Council in New York City history as the first-ever African American Speaker. Elected to the City Council in November 2017, she is also the first woman to represent District 28, which encompasses the Queens neighborhoods of Jamaica, Richmond Hill, Rochdale Village, and South Ozone Park.
Speaker Adams, who grew up in Southeast Queens with Mayor Eric Adams but is not related to him, is joining an already crowded field. It’s not an open seat, but Speaker Adams has joined the spirited crowd of challengers, which include former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, NY State Senator Jessica Ramos who represents Queens, NY State Senator Zellnor Myrie who represents Brooklyn, NYS Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani who represents Queens, former NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer, Founder and CEO of Kairos Democracy Project Michael Blake, Investor and editor at Stansberry Research Whitney Tilson, Corinne Fisher, Deirdre Levy, and Jim Walden a Partner at Walden Macht Haran & Williams, making that twelve candidates in the Democratic Primary. Republican candidate Guardian Angels Founder Curtis Sliwa is also running for the top seat in NYC.
Voters who see two Adamses on the ballot may become confused since she shares a last name with the mayor. A lottery determines the order of names on the ballot. In addition to that, there is the “speaker’s curse,” which is the annoying reality that no previous speaker of the City Council has ever successfully jumped to being elected in another citywide role, including mayor or comptroller.
The first mayor of New York City Thomas Willett was elected in 1665. 360 years later there have been a total of 110 mayors but despite women and Black Women becoming mayors all over the country, there has never been a female mayor in the largest city in the United States. Speaker Adams hopes to change all that and etch her name in the history books as the first female mayor of the city that never sleeps.
Owning a Home, the Gateway to Generational Wealth
On our premiere episode of Money Mondays, we tackle a critical issue affecting middle-class families and their ability to build wealth: the severe shortage of affordable housing in Westchester County and New York City. Join us as we welcome Drew McWilliams, a distinguished Commercial Real Estate Investment Sales Agent and Associate Director at Ariel Property Advisors. He brings his hands-on market expertise to this urgent conversation.
Drew examines how the disappearing middle-class housing market creates a wealth-building crisis for working professionals, essential workers, and families throughout the region. He’ll break down: Tune in to understand how the middle-class housing crisis affects your financial future and discover potential paths for personal wealth building and community investment. Check out Black Westchester Magazine: https://bit.ly/3BU3z6D. Please like, share, and subscribe
Schumer vs. AOC: Why the Senate Majority Leader Would Crush a Progressive Challenge
Schumer’s support for a Republican-led funding bill to prevent a government shutdown has sparked criticism from progressive factions within the Democratic Party, leading to protests and the postponement of his book tour due to security concerns. However, this raises a crucial question—who exactly is protesting? The electoral makeup of New York State, particularly in moderate-leaning areas like Westchester, Long Island, and upstate New York, suggests that a majority of Democratic voters support Schumer’s pragmatic decision rather than the alternative of letting the government shutdown.
While some activists have called for AOC to challenge Schumer in a primary, can she or any other opponent seriously campaign on allowing 900,000 federal workers to be laid off due to a shutdown? History shows that government shutdowns have disastrous consequences—not just for federal employees but also for economic stability, social services, and public confidence in government. Past shutdowns, such as the 2018-2019 shutdown under Trump (the longest in history at 35 days), the 2013 shutdown under Obama, and the 1995-1996 shutdown under Clinton, led to missed paychecks for government employees, halted public services, TSA agents calling out sick, canceled flights across the nation, and political backlash for those seen as responsible.
Furthermore, even if Schumer had pushed Senate Democrats to oppose the bill, there was no realistic path to blocking it. Speaker Mike Johnson had no legal obligation to bring the House back in session just so Democrats could reject the bill again. If they had opposed it in the House, Republicans could have simply voted again to send it back to the Senate for another round of opposition. In this scenario, Democrats would have risked being blamed for prolonging the shutdown crisis with no real chance of stopping the bill.
Schumer, cognizant of the historical and procedural realities and the Democratic Party’s plummeting approval ratings, prioritized stability over political posturing. Recent polls indicate that only 27% of Americans view the Democratic Party favorably, marking a historic low. If AOC or another challenger were to campaign against the funding bill, they would need to justify how shutting down the government—resulting in hundreds of thousands of workers losing paychecks and critical public services being disrupted—serves the interests of everyday voters. Given the party’s current struggle to maintain voter confidence, adopting a platform perceived as obstructive rather than governance-focused could further alienate constituents. In a state where many Democrats prioritize effective governance over ideological purity, Schumer’s experience and pragmatism would likely resonate more with voters, making such a campaign stance challenging to defend in a primary battle.
If a Democratic primary between Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) were held today, Schumer would likely emerge victorious. Several factors contribute to this projection:
In New York City, AOC’s progressive platform resonates deeply with voters in her Bronx and Queens home districts. However, other boroughs, including Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn and Manhattan, have more moderate Democratic voters who align more closely with Schumer’s centrist approach. In suburban areas such as Westchester County—where cities like Yonkers, New Rochelle, and Mount Vernon are located—moderate Democrats hold significant influence. Mount Vernon, a well-known Democratic stronghold, has historically supported moderate party incumbents, and Schumer has maintained strong ties with the community. His established political presence and history of working with local leaders have helped him maintain steady support in the area.
Upstate New York is known for its more conservative Democratic electorate, which also tends to support Schumer due to his longstanding career and moderate stance. As for any counties further north, Schumer is the clear favorite. These areas are predominantly moderate and do not favor AOC’s left-leaning political style, making it highly unlikely that she would gain traction among these voters.
Schumer’s lengthy tenure in the Senate has granted him strong institutional support and widespread name recognition throughout New York State. His well-established relationships with key political figures and his ability to secure federal resources for the state have solidified his appeal among a broad range of Democratic voters.
Although AOC enjoys strong backing from progressives, her close association with the party’s left-wing faction could limit her appeal in regions where moderate views dominate. A recent CNN survey found that 10% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents view her as the leader who best represents the party’s core values, placing her ahead of figures like former President Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris. However, this level of support may not be enough to overcome Schumer’s broader base of voters.
Unfortunately for AOC, Schumer has long enjoyed strong support from New York’s Jewish community, which remains a politically active and high-turnout voting bloc in both New York City and its surrounding suburbs. As the highest-ranking Jewish politician in the U.S., his deep ties to Jewish voters, particularly Orthodox communities in Brooklyn, Rockland County, and parts of Long Island, have helped solidify his electoral strength. His consistent pro-Israel stance, advocacy for Jewish causes, and leadership on issues like combating antisemitism have made him a trusted figure among both moderate and conservative Jewish voters. In areas with significant Jewish populations, such as Borough Park, Flatbush, and the Upper West Side, Schumer has maintained strong political relationships that have helped secure his position in past elections.
AOC would face a significant challenge in winning over Jewish voters, especially after the recent congressional primary defeat of Jamaal Bowman in New York’s 16th District, where the Jewish vote played a decisive role in his loss to George Latimer. Bowman’s progressive stance on Israel and alignment with The Squad alienated many Jewish voters in Westchester and Riverdale. This led to a historic rejection of a progressive incumbent in favor of a more centrist, pro-Israel candidate. This serves as a clear warning sign for any progressive challenger, including AOC, that Jewish voters in New York, especially in high-turnout areas, will strongly push back against candidates perceived as adversarial to Israel. Schumer’s long-standing Jewish support would likely be a decisive factor in a statewide race, further strengthening his position against a primary challenge from the left.
Politically for the progressive movement, an unsuccessful primary challenge by AOC against Schumer would likely be viewed as a more consequential defeat for progressives than Bowman’s loss to Latimer due to differences in their national profiles, the scale of the electoral contests, and the strategic ramifications for the movement.
While a potential AOC candidacy could energize the party’s progressive wing, current political conditions, regional voter dynamics, and Schumer’s deep-rooted position suggest that he would likely win a primary if it were held today. Nevertheless, the ongoing evolution of the Democratic Party means that future developments could reshape the outcome of such a contest.
Canada’s Proposed Pornhub Ban as Retaliation in U.S. Trade War
In an unexpected twist to the ongoing trade tensions between Canada and the United States, discussions have emerged regarding a potential Canadian ban on American access to Pornhub, a Montreal-based adult content platform. The idea, initially suggested as a satirical response to escalating tariffs, has gained attention as a creative yet controversial form of economic retaliation.
Background on U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute
The trade relationship between Canada and the United States has faced increasing strain due to tariffs imposed on key industries such as steel, aluminum, and automotive goods. The latest round of economic measures has sparked calls for Canada to explore unconventional countermeasures beyond traditional retaliatory tariffs.
The Pornhub Factor
Montreal, Canada, is home to Pornhub, one of the most visited adult content websites in the world. Some Canadians have proposed blocking American access to the platform as a means to exert pressure on the U.S. government, arguing that such a move would highlight Canada’s leverage in a non-traditional economic domain.
This idea gained traction following comments from Canadian comedian Matthew Puzhitsky, who humorously referred to Pornhub as Canada’s “nuclear weapon” in the trade war. While initially a joke, some proponents have taken the suggestion seriously, advocating for government intervention to restrict access in response to U.S. tariffs.
Potential Impact of a Ban
The potential effects of banning U.S. access to Pornhub are uncertain but could be significant given the site’s massive American user base. According to recent statistics, the United States accounts for a substantial portion of Pornhub’s traffic, making it a major revenue source for the platform. A ban could disrupt advertising revenue and subscriber growth, while also provoking reactions from American consumers and businesses.
However, implementing such a measure presents legal and logistical challenges. The Canadian government would need to enact regulations that could potentially set precedents for internet censorship. Moreover, technical workarounds, such as VPN usage, could diminish the effectiveness of such a ban.
Public and Political Response
Public opinion on the matter is divided. Some Canadians view the proposal as a lighthearted yet symbolic act of defiance, while others criticize it as an impractical or even counterproductive approach. As of now, no official government action has been taken to pursue such a restriction, and experts believe it remains an unlikely course of action.
Despite its unconventional nature, the proposal reflects broader frustrations with the economic strain imposed by U.S. tariffs. Whether or not Canada moves forward with restricting access to Pornhub, the discussion underscores the complex and sometimes unexpected ways in which trade disputes can impact different industries and digital platforms.
For now, the idea remains a talking point rather than a concrete policy. However, it highlights the increasingly creative strategies being considered in the evolving landscape of international trade relations.
County Legislator Tyrae Woodson-Samuels Fights Against Con Edison’s Proposed Rate Increases
Westchester County Executive Ken Jenkins signed legislation that solidifies the County’s commitment to challenging Con Edison’s proposed utility rate increases. This action follows a unanimous, bipartisan vote by the Westchester County Board of Legislators to join the major rate case in New York State.
The Westchester County Board of Legislators has taken decisive action to protect residents against Con Edison’s proposed rate increases. In a unanimous, bipartisan vote on Monday, March 10th, the Board agreed to become a party to the major rate case in New York State alongside Westchester County Executive Ken Jenkins. This proactive move highlights the County’s unified commitment to protecting working-class families, seniors, and business owners and safeguarding the availability of affordable electricity and gas for all Westchester residents.
On the floor at the March 10th Board Of Legislators (BOL) meeting, BOL Majority Leader Tyrae Woodson-Samuels speaks against Con Edison’s “RIDICULOUS proposed rate increases.” Stating he and the BOL feel the current rates for electricity & gas “are already too damn high – to ask for an increase is criminal and unacceptable.”
“I’m happy to share that the Board agreed to become a party to the major rate case in New York State alongside Westchester County Executive Ken Jenkins. This proactive move highlights the County’s unified commitment to protecting working-class families, seniors, and business owners and safeguarding the availability of affordable electricity and gas for all Westchester residents,” Legislator Woodson-Samuels shared with Black Westchester.
Woodson-Samuels shared, “You can’t ask for an increase when: 1. You’re a Monopoly and 2. You pay your CEO 16M in salary/bonuses.”
The Board’s decision to join the rate case with the County Executive ensures that Westchester’s concerns will remain central throughout the proceedings and amplifies the voices of those who would be directly impacted by these rate hikes. Westchester County leadership is actively fighting for fairness and accountability in defending residents from unjustified utility rate increases.
Woodson-Samuels informs, that Westchester residents must “Take Action: Stop Con Edison’s Double-Digit Rate Hike!”
“Westchester residents, your voice is needed! Following the March 10th vote by the Westchester County Board of Legislators, we are standing alongside County Executive Ken Jenkins to fight back against Con Edison’s proposed major rate hike,” the Majority Leader shared. “You must Make your voice heard – let’s protect our residents from skyrocketing energy costs.”
So what can the residents of Westchester County do? How can they make their voices heard?
The Public Service Commission is hosting virtual hearings on Tuesday, April 8th at 1 PM & 5:30 PM and on Wednesday, April 9th at 1 PM & 5:30 PM. You must register the day before your chosen hearing at dps.ny.gov/calendar or call 1-800-342-3330.
To register for the Tuesday, April 8, 2025, 1:00 p.m. meeting click here. Afternoon Hearing Seeking public comment for the Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules, and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Cases: 25-E-0072 and 25-G-0073.
To register for the Tuesday, April 8, 2025, 5:30 PM meeting click here. 5:30 PM Hearing Seeking public comment for the Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules, and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Cases: 25-E-0072 and 25-G-0073.
To register for the Wednesday, April 9, 2025, 1:00 p.m. meeting click here. Afternoon Hearing Seeking public comment for the Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules, and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Cases: 25-E-0072 and 25-G-0073
To register for the Wednesday, April 9th, 5:30 p.m. meeting click here. 5:30 PM Hearing Seeking public comment for the Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Cases: 25-E-0072 and 25-G-0073
Any person wishing to provide a public statement on the record during the virtual public statement hearings must register to do so by Monday, April 7, 2025, for the Tuesday, April 8, 2025, virtual public statement hearings; and by Tuesday, April 8, 2025, for the Wednesday, April 9, 202,5 virtual public statement hearings; in accordance with the instructions set forth below.
To register and provide a statement electronically: This option is for participants who would like to provide a statement and who will log in to a hearing electronically. Participants must register by the date indicated above by visiting the Department of Public Service website at https://dps.ny.gov/calendar, clicking on the “View DPS Calendar Listings” button under the “Calendars” section, scrolling to and clicking on Consolidated Edison Electric and Gas Rates Public Statement Hearings for the particular hearing date, clicking the “Register” button, and providing all requested information. After registration is complete, registrants will receive a confirmation email with instructions on how to join the hearing. When logging in to participate in the virtual hearing on the appropriate date and time, participants will be asked to “select audio system.” It is recommended that participants opt to have the system “call me” or “call using the computer.” The “call me” option will require that participants enter their phone numbers.
To register and provide a statement by phone: This option is for participants who are not able to log in to a virtual public statement hearing electronically. Call-in participants wishing to make a statement at a virtual public statement hearing must register to do so by the date indicated above by calling 1-800-342-3330, following the prompts to the appropriate hearing, and then provide the following information: first name and last name, address, and phone number. On the day and time of the virtual public statement hearing, call-in registrants must dial 1-929-251-9612 and enter the access code and phone-in password listed above. All participants will be muted upon entry into the virtual public statement hearing. The ALJs will call upon each person who has registered to make a statement and will continue each hearing until everyone who has registered to speak has been heard or other reasonable arrangements to submit comments into the record have been made. Reasonable time limits may be set for each speaker as necessary to afford all attendees an opportunity to be heard. It is recommended that lengthy comments be submitted in writing and summarized for oral presentation. A verbatim transcript of each public statement hearing will be made for inclusion in the record of these proceedings.
To listen to the hearings without making a statement: Any interested person may listen to the hearings by calling 1-929-251-9612 and entering the appropriate access code and phone-in password listed above. Persons with disabilities requiring special accommodations should call the Department of Public Service’s Human Resources Management Office at 1-518-473-9463 as soon as possible. TDD users may request a sign language interpreter by placing a call through the New York Relay Service at 711. Individuals with difficulty understanding or reading English are encouraged to call the Department at 1-800-342-3377 for free language assistance services regarding this Notice.
Submit written comments by November 21, 2025: Online – Visit dps.ny.gov and search Case “25-E-0072” or “25-G-0073” or Mail – Hon. Michelle L. Phillips, Secretary, Public Service Commission, Three Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12223-1350, you can also call 1-800-335-2120.
What’s At Stake?
Con Edison proposed double-digit rate hikes for electric and gas bills in 2026, seeking approval for an average 11.4% increase for electricity and 13.3% for gas, citing the need to fund infrastructure upgrades and renewable energy investments. Con Edison is seeking to increase average electric bills by 11.4% and average gas bills by 13.3%, effective January 1, 2026.
The proposal has faced criticism from lawmakers and advocates, with some calling for the New York State Public Service Commission to reject the proposal.
In closing BOL Majority Leader Tyrae Woodson-Samuels wants the people, they have the power but they must use it. We must take action to stop Con Edison’s double-digit rate hike. “You must Make your voice heard – let’s protect our residents from skyrocketing energy costs.”
en Español
Queridos amigos y vecinos,
El lunes 10 de Marzo, la Junta de Legisladores del Condado de Westchester tomó medidas decisivas para defender a los residentes contra los aumentos propuestos por Con Edison. La Junta votó para unirse al caso estatal sobre tarifas junto con el Ejecutivo del Condado, Ken Jenkins, asegurando que Westchester tenga voz en el proceso.
La Comisión de Servicio Público del Estado de Nueva York (NYSPC) está revisando estos aumentos, que podrían incrementar las facturas residenciales en un promedio de 11.4 por ciento para la electricidad y 13.3 por ciento para el gas en 2026.
La NYSPC esta aceptando comentarios públicos. Su opinión sobre estos aumentos propuestos en la entrega de electricidad y gas es crucial y será considerada antes de tomar una decisión final.
Participe y haga oír su voz.
Audiencias públicas virtuales:
- Martes 8 de Abril de 2025 – 1:00 PM y 5:30 PM
- Miércoles 9 de Abril de 2025 – 1:00 PM y 5:30 PM
Para hablar en una audiencia:
- Regístrese antes del 7 de Abril (para el 8 de Abril) o antes del 8 de Abril (para el 9 de abril)
- En línea: dps.ny.gov/calendar
- Teléfono: 1-800-342-3330
Envíe comentarios escritos antes del 21 de Noviembre de 2025:
- En línea: www.dps.ny.gov (casos “25-E-0072” o “25-G-0073”)
- Por correo: Hon. Michelle L. Phillips, Secretary, Public Service Commission, Three Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12223-1350
- Por teléfono: Línea de opinión 1-800-335-2120
Para adaptaciones especiales (personas con discapacidades o barreras del idioma), llame al 1-518-473-9463.
Su voz es importante.
Atentamente,
Tyrae Woodson-Samuels
Líder de la Mayoría, Legislador, Distrito 13