Home Blog Page 15

The Importance of Juneteenth in Westchester County

AJ Woodson
-
0
The Importance of Juneteenth in Westchester County

Juneteenth is more than a celebration of freedom; it is a reminder of the long struggle for justice, equality, and self-determination that continues to shape communities across America, including right here in Westchester County. Observed annually on June 19, Juneteenth commemorates the day in 1865 when enslaved African Americans in Galveston, Texas, finally learned they were free—more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation.

For Westchester County’s Black community, Juneteenth represents both a historical milestone and a call to action. It provides an opportunity to honor the resilience, sacrifices, and achievements of generations of African Americans who helped build this county and this country while often facing discrimination, segregation, and systemic barriers. From the abolitionist movement to the Civil Rights Movement and beyond, Black Westchester residents have played a critical role in advancing the cause of freedom and equality.

The significance of Juneteenth in Westchester County is deeply connected to the region’s own history. Long before emancipation, enslaved Africans lived and labored throughout the Hudson Valley, including in communities that now make up modern-day Westchester County. Today, several historic sites help tell that story, including the John Jay Homestead in Katonah, the John Sands House in Peekskill, and the Philipse Manor Hall State Historic Site in Yonkers. While the Philipse family amassed wealth through the labor of enslaved Africans and participation in the colonial slave economy, Philipse Manor Hall has evolved into an important educational institution dedicated to exploring the 400-year experience of African Americans in New York, including slavery, resistance, emancipation, and the Underground Railroad.

Westchester County also played a critical role in the Underground Railroad, serving as an important corridor for freedom seekers traveling north toward Canada. Among the most notable sites is the historic Park Street AME Zion Church in Peekskill. The church served as a key stop on the Underground Railroad and has ties to prominent abolitionists such as Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglass. Another important landmark is Foster Memorial AME Zion Church in Tarrytown, founded in part by formerly enslaved Amanda Foster. Recognized as the oldest Black church in Westchester County, the congregation provided shelter, assistance, and hope to freedom seekers risking everything in pursuit of liberty.

These historic churches and community institutions stand as powerful reminders that the struggle for freedom was not confined to the plantations of the South. The fight against slavery, the quest for human dignity, and the pursuit of equality touched every corner of the nation, including Westchester County. Their stories remind us that ordinary men and women—Black and white—worked together, often at great personal risk, to challenge injustice and expand the promise of freedom for future generations.

Today, Juneteenth celebrations throughout Westchester County bring together residents of all backgrounds to recognize Black history, culture, and achievement. Festivals, educational programs, parades, musical performances, worship services, and community gatherings, even virtual ones like this, provide opportunities to reflect on the past while inspiring future generations. These events not only celebrate freedom but also foster dialogue about the challenges that remain in achieving true equity and justice.

Juneteenth is also an opportunity to highlight the contributions of Black leaders, entrepreneurs, educators, activists, artists, clergy, and public servants who continue to make a difference throughout Westchester County. Their work builds upon the legacy of those who fought for freedom and helps ensure that future generations inherit a more just and inclusive society.

In a time when some seek to roll back rights that generations fought and died to secure, and when efforts are being made to erase, sanitize, or whitewash portions of American history, and to be clear, Black History is American History, celebrating Juneteenth takes on even greater significance. Juneteenth reminds us that freedom is not guaranteed and that progress is never permanent. The stories of slavery, emancipation, segregation, the Civil Rights Movement, and the ongoing struggle for equality must continue to be told—not because they are comfortable, but because they are true. Honoring Juneteenth is about more than commemorating the past; it is about defending the truth, protecting the gains won through sacrifice, and ensuring future generations understand both the pain and the perseverance that helped shape this nation.

As we celebrate Juneteenth, we must remember that freedom is not merely the absence of slavery—it is the presence of opportunity, dignity, equality, and justice. While significant progress has been made since 1865, the work of building stronger communities and addressing persistent disparities continues. Juneteenth reminds us that the pursuit of freedom is an ongoing journey requiring vigilance, commitment, and collective action.

For Westchester County, Juneteenth is both a celebration and a reflection. It is a time to honor those who came before us, celebrate how far we have come, and recommit ourselves to ensuring that the promise of freedom and equality extends to everyone. In doing so, we not only preserve history—we help shape a better future for generations to come.

LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO, SOMEWHERE TO CELEBRATE, HERE ARE A FEW FLYERS I CAME ACROSS

LTTE: My Thoughts On Greenburgh Town Supervisor Race by Former Greenburgh Town Clerk Judith A. Beville

AJ Woodson
-
3
LTTE: My Thoughts On Greenburgh Town Supervisor Race by Former Greenburgh Town Clerk Judith A. Beville

I am a former eight-term (two years each) Town of Greenburgh elected official. During my fifteen-year tenure as Greenburgh Town Clerk, I served as a Fairview District Leader on the local level, on the Executive Committee of the Westchester Municipal Officials Association (county level), the Advisory Council of the New York State Mentoring Program (state level), and as the New York State representative to the National Democratic Municipal Officials Organization on the national level. This broad range of government exposure and experience increased my knowledge, awareness, and assessment of leaders who intentionally lead and operate based on honesty, truth, independence, and integrity, and those who intentionally lead as “operatives” of the political machinery, no matter how corrupt. Such individuals will twist, distort, and misrepresent the truth simply to undermine, sabotage, and attempt to “politically lynch” those whom they cannot control.

Paul Feiner is not, nor has he ever been, a political operative. This is precisely why there have been numerous attempts over the course of his tenure to remove him and replace him with someone who is “hand-picked” and endorsed by the local political party “machinery.” It is not surprising that his current opponent received “83%” of the vote from the local Democratic District Leaders; they are told by the Committee leadership who to vote for during the “convention” that is held before each local campaign and election process. Reportedly, Paul has recently been approached with statements such as, “I regret that I didn’t vote to endorse you.”   

This most recent campaign against Paul has been really deep-down-dirty with blatant and flagrant attacks on his professional image with the use of false and misleading accusations intended to challenge the public’s trust in him as their Town Supervisor. For example, to “jump-start” the smear campaign against him, Council members launched their own internal “misbehaving” campaign by throwing public temper tantrums and speaking to him in a harsh, cruel, and disrespectful manner – often attempting to shut him down in mid-sentence during public meetings. This strategy, which appeared deliberate in an attempt to suggest that Paul was not able to manage public meetings of the Board, only revealed four Board members who were out of control, and Paul maintained a professional demeanor. Such occurrences are not a reflection of Paul’s ability to “get along with his peers,” they are simply uncontrolled outbursts by individuals who “should know better.” As Town Supervisor, NYS law requires that Paul and others in his position, “…preside over public meetings of the Town Board.” The law does not require him to administer behavior modification meds or manage the behavior of elected officials who “act out” in public. There is a closed-door meeting option called “Executive Session” that Board members can call at any time, and where they may appropriately share their differences of opinion. Perhaps the voters should require these Board members to enroll in workshops on how to better behave at public meetings.   

Attacking his management style is another example of the “deep-down-dirty” tactics. His management style is not to “micro-manage” but to remain thoroughly aware and knowledgeable of the daily operations of each department. Alleged issues with internal management are bogus and misleading. During my tenure, 2008-2023, and even after, I never heard complaints from Department Heads about Paul. He was and remains accessible to his Department Heads beyond the standard 9-5 workday hours as well as on weekends and holidays. All worked as close, dedicated, and committed allies of Paul, and many remained part of his team for over ten years. Several excellent and highly effective ones, however, reportedly left Town Hall due to alleged harassment, extreme overreach, and attempts to control their departments by a particular council/board member. Furthermore, each Board member is assigned as a liaison to several departments. If they have been meeting regularly with their respective departments, then, certainly, they would be aware of any management concerns and address them accordingly.  

With regard to this “Forensic Audit,” approved and launched by Board members in an effort to allege that there has been mismanagement of the budget by Paul, the public should know that a Board member deliberately removed the portion of the report by the auditors, shared with the public, that stated, “No malfeasance…” meaning that there was no wrongdoing by the public official. Over the course of Paul’s tenure, he has never been accused of financial mismanagement. Further, all Board members participate routinely and are involved in the budget management and oversight process. They approve budget transfers and all matters having to do with the budget.  The uncollected taxes related to unscheduled foreclosures are the responsibility of the entire Board, as the foreclosure process is very detailed, requiring their awareness, monitoring, and approval. During the two years of COVID, the Board placed a moratorium on foreclosures to allow anyone potentially impacted to “remain in place.” This was, indeed, a humanitarian decision. All Board members are responsible for relaunching activities to schedule foreclosure auctions and reignite this tax collection process.   

Yes, Paul has been Town Supervisor for many years, and he has been more visible and accountable to the residents of the Town of Greenburgh-Entire (including the Villages) than any other known elected official in this town. He has brought about unprecedented civic engagement and public involvement compared to any other elected official in Unincorporated Greenburgh, and there has never been any evidence that he has mismanaged the town departments or the town’s budget. Please keep in mind that he is fighting to prevent Edgemont from becoming a village because he knows the devastating financial impact that such incorporation will have on Unincorporated Greenburgh, which includes Fairview. Most importantly, he has been honest, truthful, and integral, and does not deserve this atrocious campaign that has been launched against him. It is a campaign based on distorted and misleading information. I have voted for Paul in this election, and I encourage all eligible voters to do the same. I highly recommend that his opponent, Barry McGoey, spend a few years working with Paul to explore his own vision of what he proposes to do if he were Town Supervisor, so that he can experience the obstacles and challenges to implementing major changes.   

Respectfully yours,
Hon. Judith A. Beville
Greenburgh Town Clerk, 2008-2023

WILL NEW YORK RUN OUT OF ENERGY? NYISO’S WARNING SHOULD CONCERN EVERY NEW YORKER

DAMON K JONES
-
0
WILL NEW YORK RUN OUT OF ENERGY? NYISO’S WARNING SHOULD CONCERN EVERY NEW YORKER

The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO), the organization responsible for managing New York’s electric grid, recently issued a warning that should concern every resident, business owner, hospital administrator, educator, and elected official in the state. While NYISO did not say New York will definitely run out of power this summer, it did warn that the state is entering the season with one of the lowest reliability margins in recent history. In practical terms, that means New York has less room for error if demand spikes during prolonged periods of extreme heat or if generation and transmission problems occur at the same time.

The question New Yorkers should be asking is not whether there will be an emergency this summer. The more important question is how New York reached a point where such a warning became necessary in the first place. For years, state leaders have adopted policies that increase the demand for electricity. Electric vehicles, building electrification mandates, battery storage initiatives, and the broader transition toward an all-electric future have all increased the importance of a reliable power supply. At the same time, the state has removed major sources of dispatchable power generation while struggling to bring replacement capacity online fast enough to meet future needs.

Every public policy should ultimately be measured by outcomes rather than intentions. The outcome today is that the organization responsible for operating New York’s electrical grid is warning that reliability margins are shrinking while demand continues to grow. Regardless of where someone stands in the political debate over energy policy, that outcome deserves serious examination.

The issue extends far beyond keeping the lights on. New York is entering a period in which access to reliable and affordable electricity will become one of the primary factors determining economic competitiveness. Artificial Intelligence, advanced manufacturing, healthcare technology, scientific research, and large-scale data processing all require enormous amounts of electricity. States that can provide reliable power will attract investment, jobs, and innovation. States that cannot will struggle to compete.

This is why the discussion surrounding Indian Point remains important. When the nuclear facility was closed, supporters argued that renewable energy projects, transmission upgrades, and future investments would replace the power that was lost. Critics warned that removing a major source of reliable electricity before replacement infrastructure was fully operational could create long-term reliability challenges. Five years later, NYISO’s warnings about shrinking reliability margins have caused many New Yorkers to revisit that debate.

The significance of this issue becomes even greater when viewed through the lens of Artificial Intelligence. Many people think of AI as a software revolution, but it is also an energy revolution. Data centers require enormous amounts of electricity to power servers, cooling systems, storage infrastructure, and advanced computing operations. As AI becomes integrated into business, healthcare, education, finance, and government, electricity demand will continue to rise.

Healthcare may provide the clearest example of what is at stake. Hospitals and healthcare systems are increasingly adopting AI-assisted diagnostics, medical imaging analysis, patient monitoring systems, predictive analytics, and research tools. These technologies have the potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, and expand access to care. However, all of these advancements depend upon reliable electrical infrastructure. A state that struggles to meet future energy demands risks falling behind in one of the most important technological transformations of the century.

This concern is not limited to healthcare. Universities, research institutions, manufacturers, and technology companies are all making decisions about where to invest based in part on infrastructure reliability. Businesses do not locate billion-dollar facilities where power supplies are uncertain. They invest where they are confident that energy will be available, affordable, and capable of supporting future growth. If New York cannot provide that confidence, investment will increasingly flow to competing states.

What makes this discussion particularly frustrating is the tendency to blame utility companies for problems that originate in public policy. Con Edison did not establish New York’s energy strategy. Con Edison did not decide to close Indian Point. Con Edison did not create electrification mandates or determine how quickly existing generation sources would be replaced. Those decisions were made by elected officials and state policymakers. If the outcome of those decisions is a grid with shrinking reliability margins and growing concerns about future capacity, then policymakers have an obligation to address those results honestly.

Meanwhile, other states appear to be preparing for the future with greater urgency. Across the South, state governments are actively competing for AI investment, data centers, advanced manufacturing facilities, and technology jobs. Many are expanding energy production, upgrading transmission infrastructure, and exploring advanced nuclear technologies. Technology companies understand that Artificial Intelligence is not simply a competition for software engineers. It is a competition for energy. Without electricity, there is no AI economy.

The NYISO warning should therefore be viewed as more than a seasonal concern. It is a warning about whether New York’s current energy strategy is capable of supporting the economy of the future. Artificial Intelligence will continue to expand. Healthcare systems will become more dependent on advanced computing. Research institutions will require greater processing power. Businesses will demand more energy, not less.

The question facing New York is straightforward. Can the state provide the reliable and affordable electricity necessary to support those developments, or will it continue pursuing policies that increase demand faster than supply? The answer will determine not only whether New York remains economically competitive, but whether future generations choose to build their careers, businesses, and lives here or in states that are better prepared for the future.

If the Mayor Is Going to Influence the Schools, Should We Make It Official? By Samuel L. Rivers

Black Westchester
-
1
If the Mayor Is Going to Influence the Schools, Should We Make It Official? By Samuel L. Rivers

The recent school budget vote has reignited a conversation that many in Mount Vernon have quietly discussed for years.

Mayor Shawyn Patterson-Howard publicly supported the school budget. She participated in outreach efforts, appeared alongside school leadership, and used her political influence to encourage residents to vote yes.

There is nothing illegal about that.

There is nothing improper about an elected official expressing an opinion.

But it does raise a larger question:

If the Mayor is going to play a significant role in school affairs, should Mount Vernon begin exploring a system of mayoral control similar to New York City and Yonkers?

That question deserves an honest conversation.

For decades, Mount Vernon has operated under a divided government structure. The City of Mount Vernon and the Mount Vernon City School District function as separate entities. Separate budgets. Separate administrations. Separate legal departments. Separate maintenance operations. Separate procurement systems.

Yet both are funded by the same taxpayers.

The question taxpayers should ask is simple:

Are we getting the most value for our tax dollars from this arrangement?

Former Mayor Ernest Davis often spoke about what he viewed as duplication of services.

The city has a Department of Public Works.

The school district has facilities and grounds operations.

The city purchases equipment.

The school district purchases equipment.

The city maintains properties.

The school district maintains properties.

The city employs administrative staff.

The school district employs administrative staff.

Taxpayers ultimately fund both.

Should some of these services be consolidated?

Could millions of dollars potentially be saved through shared services agreements?

Would taxpayers benefit from greater efficiency?

These are legitimate questions—not political attacks.

Supporters of mayoral control point to cities such as New York City and Yonkers.

They argue that when one elected executive is ultimately responsible for educational outcomes, there is clearer accountability. Voters know exactly who to praise when schools improve and exactly who to blame when they do not.

There is no finger-pointing.

There is no confusion.

One person owns the results.

But critics of mayoral control raise equally valid concerns.

School boards were created to provide independent oversight of education.

Many believe schools should remain insulated from City Hall politics.

They worry that mayoral control concentrates too much power in one office and reduces community representation.

They argue that education decisions should be made by educators and elected school board members rather than politicians.

Those concerns deserve serious consideration.

What makes this conversation particularly relevant today is the perception among many residents that City Hall already exerts influence over school district affairs despite having no formal authority.

If taxpayers believe the Mayor’s endorsements, political influence, and public advocacy played a meaningful role in the outcome of the recent budget vote, then a reasonable question follows:

Why do we have unofficial influence without official responsibility?

If City Hall is helping shape outcomes, should City Hall also bear direct responsibility for those outcomes?

Or should the Mayor remain completely separate from school governance?

The current system often creates a gray area where influence exists but accountability does not.

That may be the worst of both worlds.

Mount Vernon residents should not be afraid to have this discussion.

This is not about personalities.

This is not about Mayor Patterson-Howard.

This is not about any particular school board member.

This is about structure.

It is about governance.

It is about accountability.

Most importantly, it is about taxpayers.

As property taxes continue to rise and residents are repeatedly asked to pay more, every aspect of government should be open for examination—including whether Mount Vernon’s current division between City Hall and the school district remains the most efficient model.

Perhaps the answer is yes.

Perhaps the answer is no.

But refusing to ask the question serves no one.

At Mount Vernon Under the Microscope, we believe every institution should be examined, every dollar should be tracked, and every assumption should be challenged.

The question is no longer whether the Mayor has influence.

The question is whether Mount Vernon taxpayers are receiving accountability equal to that influence.

That conversation is long overdue.

Question for the community:

Should Mount Vernon continue with an independent Board of Education, or should residents explore a mayoral-control model similar to New York City and Yonkers? What safeguards would you require before supporting either approach?

MountVernonUnderTheMicroscope #MountVernonNY #FollowTheMoney #GovernmentAccountability #TaxpayerFirst #SchoolBudget #MountVernonSchools #PublicPolicy #CivicEngagement #CommunityDiscussion #MountVernonPolitics

Op Ed: Why Greenburgh Needs Barry McGoey By Greenburgh Town Clerk Dr. Lisa Maria Nero

AJ Woodson
-
1
Op Ed: Why Greenburgh Needs Barry McGoey By Greenburgh Town Clerk Dr. Lisa Maria Nero

As the Greenburgh Town Clerk, I have spent the last few years working with residents from every corner of our town. I have listened to their concerns, celebrated their successes, and witnessed firsthand the challenges that many families face. Those experiences have reinforced a simple belief: leadership matters.

That is why I am proud to endorse Barry McGoey for Greenburgh Town Supervisor.

For too long, many Black residents in Greenburgh have felt that their concerns were heard, but none can say they were always acted upon. Whether the issue is affordable housing, economic opportunity, infrastructure, public safety, or investment in our neighborhoods, residents deserve leadership that listens, engages, and follows through with real results.

Barry McGoey understands that the future of Greenburgh depends on ensuring that every community has the opportunity to thrive. He recognizes the importance of protecting affordable housing and creating pathways to homeownership so that families can build wealth and remain in the communities they helped create. He understands that development should strengthen neighborhoods, not displace the people who call them home.

Barry has also demonstrated a commitment to expanding economic opportunities for local businesses and entrepreneurs. Small businesses are often the backbone of our communities, creating jobs and serving as gathering places for residents. Barry has spoken about partnering with county and regional economic development programs to help local businesses access resources, training, and opportunities that allow them to grow and succeed.

As someone who works in Town Hall every day, I know how important transparency and accountability are to building trust. Barry believes government should be open, responsive, and accessible. He understands that residents deserve to know how decisions are made, how tax dollars are spent, and what results those investments are producing.

I am also encouraged by Barry’s commitment to addressing long-standing quality-of-life issues that affect many neighborhoods, including flooding and infrastructure improvements. These are not just government issues—they are family issues. They affect where people live, how they commute, and whether they feel secure in their homes.

Equally important is Barry’s commitment to supporting the Theodore D. Young Community Center and the programs that provide opportunities for young people, families, and seniors. Strong communities require strong institutions, and Barry understands the critical role these resources play in creating pathways to success.

Barry is not interested in governing from a distance. He understands that meaningful progress comes from engaging residents, community leaders, faith-based organizations, business owners, and neighborhood advocates. He recognizes that the people closest to the challenges are often closest to the solutions.

This election presents Greenburgh with an opportunity to move forward with leadership that is focused on inclusion, partnership, and results. Barry McGoey has demonstrated that he is prepared to bring people together, tackle difficult issues, and ensure that every community has a seat at the table.

For those reasons, I am proud to endorse Barry McGoey for Greenburgh Town Supervisor. I believe he has the vision, character, and commitment necessary to lead Greenburgh into its next chapter, and I encourage residents throughout Greenburgh to support his campaign.

In Solidarity, 
Dr. Lisa Maria Nero, MPA

LTTE: Affordable Housing Strategy – Just One Reason I’m Supporting Barry McGoey for Greenburgh Town Supervisor

AJ Woodson
-
1
LTTE: Affordable Housing Strategy – Just One Reason I’m Supporting Barry McGoey for Greenburgh Town Supervisor

Dear Friends, 

Like communities across Westchester, the Town of Greenburgh faces an urgent and growing need for affordable housing. Barry McGoey, Democratic candidate for Town Supervisor, understands that meeting this moment requires more than good intentions. It requires a thoughtful, townwide strategy that expands opportunity, protects current residents, and moves affordable housing from promise to progress.

Barry believes the first step must be a comprehensive needs assessment specific to Greenburgh. That assessment should identify the types of housing our community truly needs and guide smarter zoning, targeted investments, and responsible planning. His approach is rooted in balance: affordable housing should be created throughout the Town, not concentrated in any one neighborhood.

He is equally committed to protecting residents who already call Greenburgh home. Barry will work to preserve existing affordable units and prevent displacement caused by redevelopment. No resident should be pushed out of their community because of Town-supported projects. Growth must strengthen neighborhoods, not uproot them.

Barry also recognizes that housing policy must confront longstanding inequities. He will review zoning, permitting, and code enforcement practices that may limit homeownership opportunities for people of color and families historically excluded from wealth-building. His solutions include expanding down payment assistance, supporting accessory dwelling units, and creating pathways for families to build generational wealth.

To accelerate responsible development, Barry will collaborate with the Town Board to encourage developers and property owners to exceed minimum affordability requirements. He will also pursue innovative partnerships with county, state, and federal agencies, including land acquisition, infrastructure investment, adaptive reuse, and supplemental financing tools.

Greenburgh has waited long enough for a housing strategy that is fair, practical, and forward-looking. Please join me in supporting Barry McGoey for Town Supervisor.

The primary election is this Tuesday, June 23. Early voting continues at Greenburgh Town Hall through Sunday, June 21.

Alfreda A. Williams 
Former Vice Chair, Westchester County Board of Legislators
Former Town Clerk, Town of Greenburgh 

BW June 2026 Issue (Digital Edition)

AJ Woodson
-
0
BW June 2026 Issue (Digital Edition)

Welcome to our June 2026 issue.

In this issue, we celebrate the New York Knicks winning the 2026 NBA

Championship. The first championship in 53 years since 1973. I personally waited 43 years for this day. I was only seven in 1973, and I started seriously following the Knicks in 1983, watching Bernard King, before the draft of Patrick Ewing. So I could not miss the opportunity to celebrate the New York Knicks, because everything is Orange & Blue Skies right now.

As always, we would like to take this time to thank all the readers, listeners, supporters, sponsors, contributors, and advertisers for their support in our effort to deliver the “News With The Black Point Of View” since 2014. We are always looking for writers, photographers, and interns. Email BlackWestchesterMag@gmail.com to inquire.

Send us your feedback, let us know what you think of this issue. Let us know subjects/topics you would like to see us cover in the future, and send your letters to the editor to BlackWestchesterMag@gmail.com.

Black Westchester – News With A Black Point Of View http://BlackWestchester.com 

Follow Black Westchester on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn 

Follow People Before Politics Radio on Instagram and Twitter

LTTE: Former Councilman Ken Jones on the Greenburgh Town Supervisor Race

AJ Woodson
-
1
LTTE: Former Councilman Ken Jones on the Greenburgh Town Supervisor Race

Dear Editor and Greenburgh Voters, 

I am a former three-term Greenburgh Town Councilman, current Fairview District Leader, and Chairman of the Greenburgh Housing Authority Board. 

One of the reasons I did not run for office again after serving three consecutive four-year terms is that I don’t think anyone should hold office for decades. And I think we are fortunate at this juncture to have an opponent running for Town Supervisor worthy of the challenge – endorsed Democratic candidate Barry McGoey. 

Internal management at Town Hall needs to be drastically improved. Fortunately, we have extremely competent Department heads who all hold the best interests of the Town in the forefront. I believe Barry’s fire department and union experience will make him a much better manager than incumbent Paul Feiner has been. 

Not to mention Barry’s education and experience in accounting. With that background and experience, I think he will conceive better budgets, be more fiscally responsible, and maintain our AAA bond rating. 

I also believe Barry will be able to work cooperatively with the rest of the Town Board because he knows how to cultivate relationships with his peers. It’s clear that the current Town leadership is at odds. It will be good to see them in synch and looking ahead and after us, rather  than arguing amongst themselves and “kicking the can down the road.” 

A recent Op-Ed in Black Westchester, an AJ Woodson publication, says a lot about racial equity in Greenburgh – and Fairview specifically – and challenges both candidates. Yet it contains incorrect assertions. For example, it asserts that Fairview carries an “Urban Renewal District” designation dating to the 1960s, but as a member of the Town Board, I helped repeal that designation in 2016. 

Barry has met with Fairview District Leaders, most recently at a meet and greet at the Greenburgh Housing Authority, and he met with the Parkway Gardens/Homes Civic associations on June 15. I have canvassed with Barry in Fairview. He cares about voters across the Town,  including those of us who live in Fairview. 

I will vote for Barry in the primary election on June 23, and I encourage you to vote for him as well. Early voting is from June 13 – 21. 

S. Ken Jones, Esq.

Have an opinion on an issue affecting our community? Submit a Letter to the Editor. To submit a Letter to the Editor for consideration, please email your submission to BlackWestchesterMag@gmail.com. Letters should include the writer’s full name, municipality of residence, and contact information for verification purposes. Black Westchester reserves the right to edit submissions for clarity, length, grammar, and style.

Mount Vernon Community Approves $275.5 Million 2026 -27 School Budget in Revote

AJ Woodson
-
0
Mount Vernon Community Approves $275.5 Million 2026 -27 School Budget in Revote

MOUNT VERNON, N.Y. — Mount Vernon voters approved the revised $275,542,563 budget for the Mount Vernon City School District’s 2026-27 school year on Tuesday, allowing the district to avoid a contingency budget and move forward with its educational and operational priorities. The spending plan passed by a narrow margin, 1,161 to 1,075, with voter turnout surpassing that of the initial budget vote held in May.

The approval came less than a month after voters rejected the district’s original $276.2 million budget proposal on May 19. Following that defeat, district officials reviewed their options, revised the spending plan, and returned to voters with a reduced budget that preserved student programs and services while lowering the proposed tax levy increase. The revised proposal was placed before voters in a June 16 revote and ultimately earned community approval.

Support for the budget was strongest at most voting locations across the city, with the proposal carrying every school except Pennington School. Voters at the Northside polling site overwhelmingly rejected the budget by a margin of 314 to 130. Meanwhile, voting at the city’s other Northside location, Lincoln Elementary School, resulted in a rare deadlock, with 239 votes in favor and 239 votes against the spending plan.

The votes in favor were +55 (1098- 1043), and then the last 97 absentee votes had to be counted. They came in 59 for to 32 against. The total count was 1161 in favor to 1075 against.

The approved spending plan includes a 1.50% tax levy increase and is funded through a combination of property taxes, state and federal aid, and other local revenue sources. The revised budget was developed after voters rejected the district’s original proposal, which carried a 1.99% tax levy increase.

District officials said in a statement that they “reduced the budget following the initial defeat while working to preserve student programs and services. Approval of the revised budget allows the district to avoid a contingency budget, which would have required deeper spending reductions and could have negatively impacted educational opportunities for students.”

Superintendent Dr. Demario Strickland thanked residents for their support and participation in the process.

“We appreciate every voter who took the time to make their voice heard. This budget reflects an investment in the students of Mount Vernon and helps ensure that our schools can continue providing the opportunities and resources our children deserve,” Dr. Strickland shared with Black Westchester.

In the weeks leading up to the heavily publicized revote, supporters and opponents of the budget waged an aggressive public campaign, flooding social media with posts, distributing email blasts and palm cards, producing videos, granting interviews, and publishing opinion pieces. Adding to the confusion, a group of Mount Vernon residents filed a complaint alleging that the Mount Vernon City School District had improperly campaigned in favor of the budget. Amid the competing narratives and allegations, many residents were left unsure of what information to trust.

Kathie Brewington, President of the Mount Vernon NAACP Branch #2161, who advocated for the passing of the budget, also thanked voters and members of the Mount Vernon branch.

“I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the members of the Mount Vernon NAACP for your dedication, commitment, and unwavering support of the children of our community. Your willingness to stand up, speak out, and advocate for quality education demonstrates the true spirit of service. To everyone who took the time to vote, thank you for putting our children first. Regardless of the outcome, your participation shows that you care about the future of Mount Vernon and the opportunities available to our young people. Our children deserve a community that believes in them, invests in them, and fights for their success. Thank you for making your voice heard and for helping to shape a brighter future for the next generation. Together, we stand for our children, our schools, and our community,” Mrs. Brewington shared with Black Westchester.

Not everyone was pleased with the budget passing. We reached out to a few of those in opposition to the budget for feedback on the budget passing, but we were unable to get quotes before publishing.

Rikers Captain Indicted After Allegedly Gambling At Empire Casino While on the Clock

AJ Woodson
-
0
Rikers Captain Indicted After Allegedly Gambling At Empire Casino While on the Clock

Federal Prosecutors Charge Rikers Captain Latanya Brown Indicted For Fraud, Extortion, and Overtime Theft

A Rikers Island correction captain has been indicted on federal charges, Thursday, June 11th, accusing her of extorting subordinate officers, submitting fraudulent timesheets, and collecting overtime pay while allegedly gambling at Empire City Casino in Yonkers in 2024 and 2025.

Federal prosecutors allege that Captain Latanya Brown, a supervisor with the New York City Department of Correction, orchestrated a scheme that allowed her to collect overtime compensation for hours she did not work. According to the indictment, Brown allegedly claimed she was performing official duties while spending time at Empire City Casino and other locations unrelated to her employment.

Prosecutors further allege that Brown used her position of authority to pressure subordinate correction officers into surrendering overtime opportunities and other benefits for her personal gain, including allegedly squeezing her underlings by threatening to block requests to change shifts or take vacation days unless she got gifts like a Louis Vuitton bag or a ride to Yonkers’ Empire City Casino.

Joseph Nocella, Jr., United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York; James C. Barnacle, Jr., Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI); and Nadia I. Shihata, Commissioner, New York City Department of Investigation (DOI), announced the indictment and arrest. 

“As alleged, the defendant brazenly abused her authority as a law enforcement supervisor to steal taxpayer money and terrorize her subordinates by shaking them down for money, expensive gifts, and chauffeuring her to run personal errands, including trips to a casino while she was on duty,” stated United States Attorney Nocella. “Our Office will vigorously prosecute corrupt government officials who betray the public’s trust, and where applicable, as in this case, seek forfeiture of ill-gotten funds.” 

As alleged in the indictment, Brown has been employed by the DOC since October 2001 and has held the rank of Captain since July 2007.  Between approximately July 2024 and November 2025, Brown was assigned to Rikers Island’s Facility Operations Department as a DOC supervisor.  Between approximately November 2025 and December 2025, Brown was assigned to New York State courthouses located in the Bronx.  As a Captain, Brown supervised other correction officers and was responsible for approving employee requests for shift-schedule changes, overtime shifts, and vacation time.  In 2024 and 2025, Brown regularly threatened to withhold approvals for shift changes, overtime shifts, and vacation time requests for her officers unless they agreed to pay her money, buy luxury items for her, and/or perform personal errands for her.  For example, in December 2024, Brown forced several officers to buy an expensive Louis Vuitton bag for her.  When Brown made her demand, she made statements to the DOC officers implying, in sum and substance, that their shift assignments, overtime shifts, and vacation time would be in jeopardy unless they purchased the luxury item.  Additionally, on numerous occasions, Brown forced officers to drive her while on duty for non-work-related purposes, such as visits to restaurants, bars, and a casino. 

“Captain Latanya Brown allegedly abused her rank and strong-armed her subordinates to support her lavish lifestyle. The FBI is determined to aggressively pursue and hold accountable government officials who steal American taxpayer dollars while engaging in corrupt misconduct for personal enrichment,” stated FBI Assistant Director in Charge Barnacle.

In 2024 and 2025, Brown received more than $250,000 in regular pay and more than $400,000 in overtime pay.  However, on more than 100 occasions during this time period, Brown submitted documentation to the DOC claiming that she had worked the entirety of regular and overtime shifts, when in fact she actually arrived to work several hours late or left work several hours early on those occasions. On some occasions, when Brown left her assigned posting early, she did so to spend time at the Empire City Casino in Yonkers, New York. For example, on November 21, 2024, Brown claimed in documentation submitted to the DOC to have worked from 5:00 a.m. until 9:31 p.m. on Rikers Island.  However, Brown was not at Rikers Island during the entirety of that shift and instead arrived at the casino that day at approximately 2:34 p.m. Nevertheless, Brown was compensated by the DOC as if she had worked her full shift and at least seven hours of overtime. 

“As a New York City Correction Captain, this defendant was entrusted with great authority, including over those she supervised. Instead of setting the example by upholding the highest standards of integrity and fairness, as charged, this Correction Captain allegedly used her power to extort luxury gifts, money, and personal favors from her subordinates in exchange for approving overtime, schedule changes, and vacation time,” stated DOI Commissioner Shihata. “The indictment also charges that on more than 100 occasions in 2024 and 2025, the defendant allegedly collected thousands of dollars in regular and overtime pay for hours she did not work — coming to work late and leaving her post early, including to go to a casino. I thank the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the New York Office of the FBI for their continued partnership in protecting taxpayer funds and holding public employees accountable.”

The charges in the indictment are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. If convicted, Brown faces up to 20 years in prison.

The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Public Integrity Section. Assistant United States Attorneys Andrew Grubin and Andrew Wang are in charge of the prosecution with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Johnson Peow. 

1...141516...195Page 15 of 195